It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Diana and Dodi film bankrolled by Mohamed Al Fayed we will never get to see

page: 1
20
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+3 more 
posted on Jul, 7 2012 @ 07:35 PM
link   


Plans to release a controversial documentary on the death of Princess Diana to coincide with the 15th anniversary of her fatal car crash in Paris have been scrapped, I can reveal.

The film, bankrolled by former Harrods owner Mohamed Al Fayed which claims the Princess was murdered in an Establishment plot involving Prince Philip, was due to be released in America on August 31.

But now, just a year after it was shown to incredulous critics at the Cannes Film Festival, Unlawful Killing has been dramatically withdrawn and will not be screened anywhere in the world.
www.dailymail.co.uk...



The British establishment is secretive and deadly. No doubt they have threatened Al Fayed even though the article make it look like the film was withdrawn for legal reasons. Can you imagine Al Fayed being worried about being sued?

Like 9/11, it seems state actors can kill whom they want.

Here are a series of clips from the documentary that will give you a taste of what you have been denied.










edit on 7-7-2012 by Ilovecatbinlady because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 7 2012 @ 08:25 PM
link   
First off, there is already a long thread about this.

Second, the guy that made the film is the one that made the choice. He didn't want to be sued by the people he talks about in the film.

And lastly, if you really want to see it that bad, it won't be that hard to get a hold of.

But by all means, continue thinking that MI6 or someone else paid a visit to the film maker and told him to not release it "or else" Might not be true, but hey at least that's more exciting than a man fearing lawsuits.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 01:24 AM
link   

Negotiations with a U.S. distribution company concluded with an agreement to screen it. But the deal hinged on the filmmakers securing special insurance indemnification for the distributors covering the territories of the UK and France.

A spokesman for the producers says: ‘Unlawful Killing had been sold all around the world, including the U.S. But there was a specific form of insurance needed by the U.S. distributors to cover them for their UK and French offices.

'This proved impossible to secure. As a result of this the film has been withdrawn in perpetuity.’


They didnt want to pay the insurance required the distributor needed for France and the UK, who are covered under different laws than the US for movie releases.

No conspiracy, just lack of financing. If they are going to spend money making the "documentary" then they should have researched costs in getting it distributed.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 04:58 AM
link   
The reason why the film was withdrawn is that it made several serious errors that have been exposed. This undermines the credibility of the research in the film so much that the producers had no choice but to withdraw it after it was panned by the critics at the Cannes Film Festival.

If you want to discover the truth about Diana's death, research what happened to James Andanson, whom Diana invited onto Dodi's yacht to take photos a few days before her death:
www.express.co.uk...
There was an official intelligence file on the internet about his assassination by a Yugoslav intelligence agent code-named "T". It seems now to have been removed. Notice the links missing from the following blog:
dianaunlawfullkilling.blogspot.co.uk...
I discussed it here at ATS before the archives disappeared:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 8-7-2012 by micpsi because: Added important comment.

edit on 8-7-2012 by micpsi because: Vital links to previous discussion at ATS added.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 07:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by James1982
First off, there is already a long thread about this.

Second, the guy that made the film is the one that made the choice. He didn't want to be sued by the people he talks about in the film.

And lastly, if you really want to see it that bad, it won't be that hard to get a hold of.

But by all means, continue thinking that MI6 or someone else paid a visit to the film maker and told him to not release it "or else" Might not be true, but hey at least that's more exciting than a man fearing lawsuits.


I think the British security services are dangerous and criminal by nature capable of doing what Al Fayed alleges. We know the British security services took part the horrific torture of innocent people at US black sites.

We also know that MI5 and MI6 fairgame targets of opportunities for the shear hell of it. Here is a link to the story of 5 British Somali youth workers www.independent.co.uk....

If you search the internet, there stories by British nationals remorselessly stalked and harassed for years until they are made demented by it.
edit on 8-7-2012 by Ilovecatbinlady because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 12:47 PM
link   
Never Mind distribution costs, if he really wants this seen he'll wack the full programme up on the internet.

And redardless of whether there's proof to back it up, you can rest assured the British Establishment *would not* sit comfortably with this doc.

I was a kid when Diana died. I remember coming home from school, watching TV on the floor of my living room, and seeing the breaking news that carried Dianas death. The image of her being wheeled into an Ambulance with a white sheet covering her, apart from one foot, will always stay with me.

Just like I remember what corner shop I was in when 9/11 struck, and watching the breaking news on a little telly mounted on the wall.

In our hearts of hearts, we know Dianas death wasn't a simple accident.. No one just crashes with the worlds most loved Princess in the back!

I'm yet to dig deep regarding this conspiracy, I think its time I started looking now, if anyone can provide some resources for me, to give me a head start, that would be great.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 01:56 PM
link   
This evidence proves that Diana's death WAS a conspiracy:
dianaunlawfullkilling.blogspot.co.uk...
The French police claimed that infamous paparazzo James Andanson, whom Diana invited on board Dodi's yacht a few days before her death to take pictures, burnt himself to death by pouring petrol over himself. Unfortunately for them:
1. His receipt showed he had earlier bought diesel, not petrol, which no one who was planning suicide would have done because the liquid does not ignite easily.
2. his car door was found locked, yet no car keys were found inside the car. The assassin messed up by retaining Andanson's car keys and by shooting him TWICE in the head (as asserted by the French fireman who found his burnt body) which would have been impossible for someone who was trying to commit suicide. Besides, why bother to set fire to your car if you are going to shoot yourself? This was done to destroy any trace of the murderer's finger prints.

The intelligence file created by SIS friends of Andanson, who did freelance spying for SIS, revealed that a Yugoslav agent named "T" who had worked on the infamous Saffra case carried out the killing. Andanson was silenced no doubt because he had started to brag about his presence in the Alma Tunnel where Diana died and he might have spilled the beans about the involvement of certain intelligence agencies in her death. In other words, he had become a loose cannon whom the agencies he had worked for could no longer trust to keep silent over what really happened in Paris that day.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 02:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Sinny
 


Coming home from school to the news.........? she died on a sunday......... think your memory is a little out here



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 03:52 PM
link   
They should definitely put the film on YouTube so people can get to see it.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 04:11 PM
link   
Abit off topic, Prince Phillips close connection with the Nazis? Wow sh*% just gets more deeper and deeper as i look into it. Diana was just one individual who was murdered by these inbred satanists. These people are responsible for millions of deaths.

- Hitler Rothschilds Ashkanazi blood with the recent DNA findings.

- Hitler signing Havaara Agreement collaborating Zionist Federation for the creating of Zionist state in Palestine.

- Arthur James Balfour allowing the Zionist Rothschilds federation to occupy Palestine with Queens approval.

- US/Zionist banks funding and arming Hitler.

- Operation Paperclip.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 07:58 PM
link   
reply to post by theruthlessone
 


Yea, guess it is lol.. I was sitting watching TV in the afternoon though.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:48 PM
link   
Wait. I heard this movie was great (from a friend who saw it at Cannes). I was looking forward to seeing it.

No film should be censored. Everything should be out for debate.

If the Queen put the hit on Princess Diana because she was pregnant with a boy that would have to be Muslim, then she would also do anything to shut up Fayed. Now we're stuck with looking at Camilla all the time. What an ugly old hag. She must have an amazing talent.

I hope the filmmaker will edit to remove the questionable footage and possibly add more (solid) investigations to it. It's a topic that many people want to pursue, as most of us think Diana died at someone's command.
edit on 8-7-2012 by twoandthree because: edit



posted on Jul, 9 2012 @ 03:51 AM
link   
Regardless of the errors in the documentary, I have always felt Diana was murdered. Even Diana herself knew it was coming, otherwise, she would not have written it down or spoke of it. Despite the hell that the Queen and Prince Charles put her through, she seemed to be an honest and level headed woman.

I believe that Prince Phillip and the Queen had her killed. I don't even think it was because of Dodi or there being connections with a Muslim. I just think the Queen simply hated Diana, and wanted her revenge. Phillip and the Queen were angry over all of the tabloid hell that Diana brought down upon them, shaking that family to it's core. I bet she still seethes over it today. She literally had to be cajoled into speaking to her country men and women, after Diana's death. Everyone knew of her hatred for Diana, and the abuses that she suffered from that family.

Plain and simple, the Queen was angry that Diana didn't tow the line when it came to Charles and Camilla.



posted on Jul, 9 2012 @ 04:10 AM
link   
Seems the royal genocide monarchy does not want the truth about how it murdered Diana out.



posted on Jul, 9 2012 @ 04:55 AM
link   
I also think that her "surprise announcement" was going to be that she was to marry Dodi. Perhaps the queen didn't like the idea of her grandsons William and Harry having Dodi as their step father. She probably wanted Dodi out of the picture one way or the other, and if Diana gets taken out too, all the better. I am quite certain Diana and Dodi had an infiltrator following them on that summer vacation all the way to Paris, reporting her every step to the queen and Phillip. I think her assassination was planned once they found out about the coming marriage. There is no way the queen would allow there to be another male father figure in William and Harry's lives.

When the queen directed Charles and Diana to take a six month separation from one another, she didn't expect that Charles would become careless, bringing Camilla into his life more openly. Diana responded in turn, by going on with her life and making her relationship with Dodi public. Obviously that was her plan, inviting a photographer on board the ship they were on that summer. It is too bad that Diana didn't think this through, otherwise, she might still be alive today. She knew that she could pay with her life, trying to move on and be happy. What she should have done is kept it all private, and married in secret if need be.

I do not think Diana was pregnant. A lot people like to entertain the idea of this, especially since her photos show her with a rounded belly. First off, Diana had gradually gained some weight, because she was happy again. Second, the rounded belly is normal with a woman's menstrual cycle, and third, she was heading into her late 30's, which is when many women start to become a little less toned in the abdominal region.

The queen wanted Diana for breeding. She knew Charles had Camilla, and she knew Charles would not be able to give her up. Diana was young and naive, and was genuinely in love with Charles, but he never loved her, he was in love with Camilla. It has been said by Diana herself that the queen discussed all of this with her and asked her to be tolerant of Camilla, and that if she wanted, she could have her own private liaisons. Diana didn't like this. She wanted genuine relationships and honesty. She didn't find that in the house of Windsor. Afterall, Prince Phillip had his affairs on the side that the queen tolerated and looked the other way. She expected the same out of Diana, and to stick to royal duty.

Diana gave these evil people two sons to the house of Windsor, yet they still hated her and killed her. It is a shame that they got their hands on William and Harry, so that they could brainwash them and keep them from wanting to perform investigations. It is well known that William will not discuss his mother or her death with anyone, unless it is done so in the light of his missing her, or speaking of her life in a different manner. No conspiracies.

Some day, evil Phillip and Elizabeth will be gone, as well as Charles and Camilla, and maybe then, the truth will emerge.

Can you only imagine the paces that old bag puts Kate through? I mean, only recently she made up new rules for the family in regards to who must curtsey to whom in that family. Kate has to curtsey to Camilla. I bet Diana rolls over in that grave of hers repeatedly.


edit on 9-7-2012 by Starchildren because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2012 @ 05:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sinny
No one just crashes with the worlds most loved Princess in the back!


So being a "princess" somehow makes you immune to the laws of physics....

All her death shows is you should always wear a seatbelt, and do not get in a car driven by a drunk driver!

if the "princess" had done either of those 2 simple things she would be alive today!



posted on Jul, 9 2012 @ 05:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by twoandthree
she was pregnant with a boy that would have to be Muslim,


Actually the talk going around is that Mohamed Fayed arranged the hit, as Dodi was going to convert to christianity!



posted on Jul, 9 2012 @ 05:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by Sinny
No one just crashes with the worlds most loved Princess in the back!


So being a "princess" somehow makes you immune to the laws of physics....

All her death shows is you should always wear a seatbelt, and do not get in a car driven by a drunk driver!

if the "princess" had done either of those 2 simple things she would be alive today!


Maybe not. I lost a cousin who died with a seat belt on, in a similar crash that Diana was in. Maybe she didn't know the driver was drunk. There was some last minute changes. Their car would not start and had to quickly be replaced. I'm sure Diana's thoughts were elsewhere, as there was an impending engagement to announce.



posted on Jul, 9 2012 @ 05:47 AM
link   
For those interested:

Some believe that Diana was alive after the crash, then killed.

vigilantcitizen.com...

And if you lean toward an occult meaning behind her death, there are definitely some creepy photos of memorials to Diana and Dodi worth looking at on this site:

vigilantcitizen.com...



posted on Jul, 9 2012 @ 05:51 AM
link   
Here is how it is, a video like that is disrespectful, and if MAF is involved no doubt it will be full of paranoid lies (although the truth in his mind).

FACT Henri Paul was drunk and under the influence of prescription medication, FACT the paparazzi were chasing them, but not ultimatley responsible, FACT Henri Paul was driving at twice the speed limit clipped a Fiat which caused him to lose control of the car and crash into a pillar.

MAF wants to wind his neck in and accept the fact that there was no-one else to blame other than the driver.



new topics

top topics



 
20
<<   2 >>

log in

join