It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If your employer coverage exceeds 9.5% of your household income or is inadequate (i.e., the portion the health plan pays of covered benefit costs falls below a certain level), you may also be able to purchase coverage in the Exchange and receive financial assistance.
Health plans will be able to offer a lower cost “catastrophic plan” to people who are under 30 or who are exempt from the requirement to purchase coverage based on federally defined criteria.
Originally posted by THEDUDE86
Originally posted by TheRedneck
As I am understanding this, it can be upheld if it is a tax, which pretty much means insurance will have to be administered through taxation itself instead of requiring individuals to buy private insurance. The law is constitutional if re-written in that manner, unconstitutional if requiring individuals to purchase their own insurance.
Confusing, but that's what I get.
TheRedneck
SPOT ON....that is exactly what it is
but everyone needs to understand we ALREADY were paying for people who didnt pay, through high medical cost
not much will change but for the most part most of us WILL NOT notice any difference
My boss told me today that it is going to cost him approx. $10,000 more for every employee
Originally posted by AnonymousMoose
I work two jobs, and live paycheck to paycheck...I have no medical insurance but have a doctor I can see for about $75 for basic visits, and I can also visit some clinics. Who says this healthcare mandate will make healthcare cheaper? This law will mandate that we all MUST PURCHASE INSURANCE! What if that insurance is $800 a month? How would we even afford this?
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Char-Lee
What I don't understand is how people who have always wanted insurance, but cannot afford it, can hardly pay their electric bills and eat, will suddenly be able to buy insurance just because a law ordered it.
Because an expanded pool of subscribers spreads the risk around. This would allow the insurance companies to charge lower rates. The rates would need to be competitive because insurance would be offered on brokered exchanges, where consumers could choose the company that charges the least for the most coverage. In practice, of course, consumers will not be able to understand what is on offer and go with the company with the cutest mascot. I chose my auto insurance based on a sexy cartoon female superspy. Wouldn't you?edit on 28-6-2012 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by maplecustom
Let me get this straight US folks...Do you pay alot of different taxes? is the system nothing like "I pay X% tax of my income" Do you have different tax posts?
Originally posted by the4thhorseman
Originally posted by spinalremain
Originally posted by the4thhorseman
In case my question is lost..what about the 48-49% of people that don't pay taxes now...ARE they exempt from this tax if they opt out of having insurance?
Right. Babies will not have to pay the tax.
Sarcasm will get you know where friend..clearly you are missing the point. Right now about only 51% of Americans pay into the system. They others do not..since this IS a tax are these other 49% exempt from it?
IF we are all mandated to have it then everyone should be required to pay into it NO EXCEPTIONS..plus close all loop holes allowing those here illegally to have access to it.