Do "They" Love Their Children Too? A visit to Apollo 17 landing site...

From always I'm fascinating by this image of Apollo17 history.nasa.gov... What is depicted in the Eugene Cernan's visor? The USA flag, the Earth in background, and what else...? What are the Anomalies and the glares in Cernan's visor? Many times these anomalies were explained that the glares on the visor were those of the Lem and Rover. But to a careful analysis, this is impossible. What we see reflected on the visor is that is found in front of Eugene Cernan. Indeed, the Lem and Rover are exactly to its shoulders, behind him. www.lpi.usra.edu... . So, what? The glares are right in front of Eugene Cernan. To a closer look I've found at least 4 anomalies, and I think that "someone" has made a friendly visit to the astronauts and their lander. The image show that "someone" has made visit to the new ones arrived and has carried on also a "Child" to observe the new strange hosts.
They are not so different from us... and maybe better than us.
The Others. Yes, our neighbors: The Aliens... The Extraterrestrials.

The Area


Four anomalies in the Cernan's visor.


Daddy


Child


Ship


Device

WOW! Could be anything but it really looks strange. Reminds me of an Alien from Independence Day..



welcome to earth!!

I sleep better at night knowing guys like you are looking out for us.

Here's my issue... did we really go to the moon or not?
If we didn't, these anomalies are stage props and such?
If we did, then what are these anomalies? Is NASA only half lying to us?

I'd love to be an experienced example for new ATS members, so I do what I can, and try to have perfect spelling in all my posts. As far as NASA and the moon hoax, the jury is still out on this topic for me.

I will tell the rookies to be mindful of your posts, you are a good member.

reply to post by Arken


www.aulis.com...

This is the best website for me about the strange things in photos from all the moon landings, it is really well done and explains things for the simple minded (which is right up my street.) give it a try i promise you'll like what the site author has done.

Not knowing anything about the photo, but going on just what I'm seeing it looks like the "child" is another astronaut. I can see the suit completely. Maybe I'm seeing it wrong, but that's what it looks like to me. The other thing? No clue. HAHA

reply to post by Syntagma

it looks like the "child" is another astronaut.

No. This is not the other astronaut that shoot photo.
Totally different spacesuit and no backpack.

Well.... It´s interesting to see.

I don´t have a firm standing regarding wheter the USA went or not to the moon (I think they went, but the pics and videos are staged) but this kind of anomalies always made a good discusion.

Nice post !

Interesting as the photos are, the picture of the device, in my opinion, is the ocean on the earth.

reply to post by Arken


The "child" is Harrison Schmitt...

history.nasa.gov...

Some of the 'images' look like dust on the visor.
JMHO.

Looking through visor, I can see that he is wearing some kind of wrinkled tin foil hat, also some contours of his face is visible.

reply to post by JibbyJedi


Thanks Jibby.

did we really go to the moon or not?

Yes

stage props and such?

Yes

Is NASA only half lying to us?

Yes


Why?
Because they already known what they could find on the Moon.

reply to post by Arken

It just looks like more astronauts to me, idk though. It is interesting that the whole crew from the very first trip to the moon believes in ETs, so idk that sort of says something to me.

thank you very much, Arken!
i saw this shot [or another very similar] on one of the 'did we didn't we' moon threads when i was asober
tried to find it later on to show my skeptic brother but could not for the life of me remember which thread
i seem to recall one in which the 'child' took the shot
at an angle that would make it impossible for it to be a full grown human
though that could easily be the invention of my chemically imbalanced brain

what is all this about?!
we may never know.... at least it makes interesting discussion for now i guess.