Apollo 17 Photography Stations Located To Within 50 cm On LROC Map

A lot of times with sort of thing you may need to calibrate the maps from scratch. It can be tricky.

R.I.P neil. You took giant steps and leaps for all mankind and wil be sorely missed..
A true hero, we will never forget you! it's one giant loss for us all .

Neil was without peer. He could take a shot and then some. I loved him like a brother. I loved him like a father. I loved him so dearly I cannot stand this day. Oh Neil we love you so much.

Originally posted by hesse
The genius Stanley Kubrick could have still pulled off that hoax.

Interesting information mate!

edit on 26-6-2012 by hesse because: (no reason given)

genius so many errors on 2001 to be a genius!

I wonder if the Lunar Reconaissance Orbiter can swing into an even lower orbit to get even higher-res images of the landing sites.

Originally posted by wildespace
I wonder if the Lunar Reconaissance Orbiter can swing into an even lower orbit to get even higher-res images of the landing sites.

You might like this

Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie
I stand corrected, the first official lunar lander was Luna 9, landed on Moon in January 1966.

That is 8 years prior to Apollo 17.

So again: The Russians did land on the moon 8 years before Apollo 17, yet you still show low-resolution LRO photographs

DO YOU even understand what resolution means

Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
reply to post by DJW001

 

Interesting video, yet it doesn't proof much.

After the rocket leaves my sight, how do I know where it go, or what it does? For all I know it just falls back to earth out of my sight.

Also, video footage of the event does not proof anything. I was just told this in this thread and another thread too.

vvv

edit on 11-7-2012 by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep because: (no reason given)

Well Jodrell Bank In the UK tracked the missions and the Russian probes as well!