Undercover Reporter Infiltrates Security Firm to Expose London Olympics

Highlights:
- Foreign troops drafted in- Drug deals in training classroom
- Ineffective screening processes and detection technology
- Photographs of sensitive mock-up screening areas taken by un-screened trainees
- 200k 'casket linings' delivered- Uniforms being stolen
- Plan for an evacuation of London- Drones on-line (incl. armed)
- Poor standard of security recruits - cant speak English.

Exclusive interview with investigative journalist Lee Hazledean who is training undercover as a security guard for the London olympics with private security firm G4S. Lee is a filmmaker and investigative TV journalist. He has also been involved in major stories on the IRA and how British Army infiltrated the organisation and carried out false flag operations. He has managed to get undercover as part of the security team at the 2012 Olympics with G4S. He has found there is a media black out on all major news outlets to do with the Olympics unless the story is broken in a news paper or foreign news agency it's unlikely to see the light of day. Security training and officers are so appaling that the safety and security of the London 2012 Olympics are in jeopardy.

A few example's: During an exercise he was asked to pose as a would-be terrorist and managed to get knives, guns and IED's through security screening on every occasion and every exercise. The X-Ray operators have only two days of training, they aren't trained properly and miss the most obvious prohibited items gun's, knives, IED's, ammunition etc. Bag and physical searchers again are missing dangerous weapons, trainees can't use vital security equipment like the HHMD (Hand Held Metal detectors) they can't even communicate properly with the public on a basic level. Worryingly the 'Rapiscan' walk through metal detectors don't work properly and aren't sensitive enough to pick up large knives, ammunition and other metallic threats. He was told that they would be set to go off only after 50 people have walked through to limit queuing time and to get spectators into the venue. So a Terrorist if they basically queued up would probably get through wearing a suicide vest. In classes there are drug deals going down, people can't speak any English. People who haven't even completed their SIA licenses yet are being picked to be Team Leaders over highly trained security officers, ex soldiers and ex police. Lee is concerned that weapons or worse will be getting into the games. However, what's more disturbing is that uniforms are already going missing or being stolen. The training facility is an accurate mock-up of the actual security measures at the Olympic venues. Lee has witnessed several people taking photos on their mobile phones in the training facility and whilst they have been a few people caught by trainers most aren't noticed. We know that terrorists take surveillance photos to gain intelligence. Contemporary International claim that they have mobile phone 'jammers' in the facility, however trainers admitted to Lee that there were no 'jammers' at all, it was a verbal deterrent.

Also there are plans for the evacuation of London, G4S are going to be at the forefront, as well as 100,000 troops coming in via Woolwich barracks made up of regular British Forces, American regular army and European troops. Lee was not told why there would be any need for an evacuation of the whole of London, they just said it was to be a "defining moment in the history of London". This could just be a precaution but the public should be made aware of the foreign invasion which is taking place right now. The troops are being held across London in various barracks once they've been through Woolwich. Lee also had this information confirmed by an army doctor who was shocked at all the foreign troops coming into London. There is also a shipment of what are being described as casket linings, each casket can hold four or five people and 200,000 casket linings have been delivered we believe from America. Also we were shown videos of drones attacking targets in Afghanistan and were told that drones will be patrolling the sky's over London during the Olympics carrying out surveillance and search and destroy missions if necessary
www.radio4all.net...

also sniffer dog's explosive check's were NEVER carried out
www.thesun.co.uk...

Why is this in the general chit chat forum? I almost didn't click it because I thought it was just, well, general chit chat.

Stolen Uniforms...
Ability to sneak in anything...
Pictures being taken of mock set up...
200,000 casket linings...
Prepared to Evacuate London...

Well... I know where I'm NOT going this summer...

From everything you posted, it almost seems as if 'they' are asking for it!

How long have they had to prepare for this? C'mon!

Pathetic...

sounds like typical british management where its been sub contracted and then sub contracted again until the only people the final company can employ are minimum wage foreigners who to be honest don't give a crap as they'll never get to see the games and will be leaving after the games and who's security check is probably a 2 minute passport check and then job done and as for training it costs money so do the basics and get it signed off then leave them to it with no support but to take all the blame when someone enters with a bomb etc

WRONG FORUM!!! MODS, PLEASE MOVE AS THIS WILL NOT GET THE ATTENTION IT DESERVES IN AN 'OFF TOPIC' FORUM... THIS IS VERY 'ON TOPIC', sorry for caps but I'm pretty pissed that the OP put this in an off topic forum.

This security firm sounds like a joke. I understand that they have to recruit a whole lot of individuals, but they should have had the management in place a long time ago to make this happen. The conspiracy theorist in me thinks that it may be possible this is being done on purpose, as this is 2012, and every single month was predicted to be "the end," lol. I hope everything goes smoothly. If anything happens, it probably will not have been perpetrated by any of the major terror groups, as the ones everyone hears about everyday are the ones who have been dismantled. It would be done by a few obscure, ideological people, or a certain government would select, equip, and train certain people to perform an attack.

You can tell which it is based on the organizational skill in which they operate. I mean it is easy to spot when one guy brings a bomb into a building, but something on the scale of 9/11 or larger, needs government approval somewhere up the chain of command.

reply to post by Wide-Eyes


iv requested for the mods to move it mistake on my part putting it in this section

I NEVER star / flag things due to not ever logging in however this thread made me do so.

I would like to say im surprised, but im not.
Will be checking back on this thread for further information. The few things that puzzles me are ..

No.1 - How is it now possible, for this guy to go back to work for G4S without being found out? He mentioned trainers who told him things personally thus if they wanted to, im sure it wouldnt be impossible to work out who is the insider. Also accent?

No.2 - Iam unsure I believe that the police have no jurisdiction over G4S. As far as Iam aware the only time that comes into play is with Special Ops, G4S is only a security firm. Hell you pay peanuts you get monkeys.

No.3 - The BIGGEST issue now is (With no thanks to ATS) That there is SOOOO many possibilities now of what could happen (If anything at all) It imo is impossible to consider..

Aliens.. False Flag.. Real terrorist?.. Nothing.. Bombs.. etc etc (Note: Keywords will more than likely flag something up lol)..

Watch this space..

Firstly: foreign nationals are used as cheap labor, it's rampant here in Australia, im finding hard to keep work forms guards when other "immigrant" owned business are charging 30% less, and aren't doing the job.
Sexond: G4S is a multinational corporation, who have business deals with a lot of governments etc.

My take on this? Well, when you put barely capable individuals, especially immigrants into positions of leadership or highly sensitive areas, what you get is a premise for "inside job" tactics, now not saying a company would do this, but if you wanted to cause a potential catastrophe, then security guards incapable of operating to standards needed, will in turn be fall guys.

So,
G4S appoints untrained-newly licenced guards to lead teams.
An "attack" is therefor "allowed" to happen as the chances of success are higher when a lower chance
Of being caught is present.

G4S is in bed with big gov. And sets it self up as a fall guy, and gets a pay off, yet still saves face by being able to coordinate a city wide evacuation, at the end the culpable guards appointed team leaders and supervisors get pinned for conspiracy as they will be labeled insurgents that some how "passed through tight screening".

G4S turn over there employees to the government for crimes that G4S facilitated, and G4S regains public standing by ways of the lovely MSM.

That's what I see anyway.

reply to post by haven123


I'm about to watch the video so I can't really comment on the validity or accuracy of it but if what this guy says is true then I am infinitely embarrassed to be British. How could this possibly be allowed to happen? With all the billions that have been poured into this financial black hole of a spectacle you'd think they could spare a few million to pay for some ex-military/ex-police consultants to be security team leaders (can you say 'professional'?) and maybe some English-speaking security staff to do the work.

I can see a few plausible scenarios here...

1) MI5 and MI6 have done their job and are supremely confident that there is no terrorist threat and therefore authorised a large consignment of bananas to pay for the olympics security operation.

2) The security is being botched on purpose to allow some kind of attack to take place in order to justify a police state.

3) Someone somewhere has embezzled a lot of olympic funding thus leaving the security organisers with no choice but to book the bargain basement option and then keep their fingers crossed.

4) Whoever is responsible for this fiasco is a twat and doesn't see the problem.

I now need to go and breathe into a paper bag for a while until I stop hyper-ventilating and then plan a bug-out bag and secondary safe location that I can retreat to at a moment's notice in case something horrible actually kicks off. Or maybe I'll take some first aid training and be ready to volunteer to help sort out the mess.

In the meantime, this information needs to be broadcast far and wide to embarrass those in a position of responsibility to turn this mess around.

reply to post by sombunall


its a radio brodcast and he says at one point he went to channel 4 with it but they said there was a media blackout on anything negative about the olympics,the security trainers said there was a somthing after the olympic's thatwil change london and the planned evacuation

Another scenario not yet considered...

We all suspect that most terrorism is actualy false flag ops. If this is true then those at the top will know whether anything is going to happen.

If they know nothing is going to happen then it makes sense to do everything on the cheap for example cheap foriegn labour, fake screening, verbal deterents etc

Its my guess based on the evidence offered that nothing is going to happen other than G4S making an awful lot of money.

reply to post by haven123


Hmmm. And the organisers have reputedly spent ( Wasted, in my view...). £32,000,000 hawking the Olympic flame around on a prestige tour. Money that could have contributed to proper security.....?

Yes, I know, I'm a miserable sod !

There is no prestige in security so let's keep it low budget.. We may regret cheapskating in this matter. I hope not....

reply to post by VoidHawk


Thats what i was thinking. No way could they be that bad and unprepared, it has to be on purpose.


But what if it is it really going to kick off ?

Im glad i got out london when i did.

ETA: can anyone explain why we would want foreign troops to help us evacuate london?
scary to think whyh its needed, still i'd rather american troops helping out then say the french!



Also how crdible is this guy? i haven'tbeen able to watch the YT link but i have read what was on the site and its scary stuff.

Can anyone who has actually listen to the radio show tell us who haven't if theres any sensationalism or does he use any words that might hint at english AJ type of guy. are the words false flag used or any other conspiracy keywords?

reply to post by Bixxi3


nope he is more worried its not conspiricy related just highlighting the masive ammount of corner cutting and other odd things

Originally posted by haven123
reply to post by Wide-Eyes

 

iv requested for the mods to move it mistake on my part putting it in this section

Thanks man and sorry for the rant, I just didn't want this to get swept under the carpet due to lack of attention.

reply to post by Bixxi3


The guy claims to have infiltrated the IRA back in the day. If true then this guy has balls of steel!

reply to post by sombunall

4) Whoever is responsible for this fiasco is a twat and doesn't see the problem.

Although this is the least likely of your 4 options, it is definitely the funniest!

reply to post by minto


I remember many, many moons ago, like in the late eighties, early nineties, G4 security losing prisoners and possibly terrorists during transportation. The details are sketchy and long before the internet took off but I definitely remember stories in the papers about how crap these guys were at security work.

There used to be jokes going round about them, I will see if I can find any info from those long gone days.

ETA: A little bit from wiki but not much...

Following the decision by the British Government in 1993 to enter into a contract with Group 4 to provide security for prisons, the company was embarrassed after a series of security blunders, including escaped prisoners.