It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Screwed
Let your imagination run wild.
Don't let me have all the fun.
Not to defend Cheney, I think the guy's a piece of you-know-what, and fully capable of such an act, but if there's going to be some sort of story like this I want it coming from a better source.
Originally posted by plube
reply to post by maxella1
Actually i will say your off on this Bush and Saudi thing...with in two hours of 911 Netanyahu Blames Al Qaeda..
So the saudi connection has quickly become a diversion...and it was a diversion created on purpose.
Former military analyst and famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is "far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers". He also said that the government is ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11. And he said that some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are credible, that "very serious questions have been raised about what they [U.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement there might have been", that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically beyond the scope of the current administration, and that there's enough evidence to justify a new, "hard-hitting" investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath (see this and this).
A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern) said “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job.
The Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 - 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College from 1986 - 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said "The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup."
Congressmen:
According to the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, an FBI informant had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House (confirmed here)
Current Republican Congressman Ron Paul calls for a new 9/11 investigation and states that "we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on"
Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job
Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) says "The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence."
Once you start leaning towards mass coverups, no planes, laser beam weapons.. You are off in la la land.
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by boncho
Once you start leaning towards mass coverups, no planes, laser beam weapons.. You are off in la la land.
Exactly, and who do you think was out there putting those theories on the internet?
The only cover up is the fact that this wasn't a surprise attack, and what's worse, rogue elements within the US government and defense department helped this happen, either through inaction, or direct action.
I'm still not buying OBL had anything to do with it. If he did, why would they have to put out a fake video of him claiming responsibility, while an actual reporter who interviewed him was told, by OBL, that he had no part in it, and didn't support it as it was a soft target, it wasn't military or a real tangible target.
The fact that before the towers even fell, most of the news stations were blaming OBL should make the hairs on your neck stand up.
When people say inside job and false flag, I'd like to think the majority are saying what I just said, a few well placed rogue agents, not the entire chain of command.
for something like this to work, the amount of people "in the know" has to be kept small, as well, the groups within have to be kept separate.
Much like the Manhattan Project, the left hand can't know what the right hand is doing.
Do I think Cheney had anything to do with this other than possibly letting it happen, no, I really don't.
A highly reliable confidential client source who wishes to remain anonymous has promised to send me an FBI copy of a high-level Al Qaida report dating back to the embassy bombings in Africa several years ago. The email report was captured in Africa from the computer file of a senior aid to Osama Bin Laden. My client has obtained this document through lawful means.
The email report, written by Al Qaida's head of military operations, Mohammd Atef, describes Al Qaida's view of ongoing secret pipeline negotiations between the US oil companies and the Taliban to build a pipeline through Afghanistan.
This Atef report was almost certainly reviewed by the late John O'Neill at the time of the Embassy bombing, shortly after the Al Qaida report was written. At the time, O'Neill was the FBI agent in charge of the Embassy bombing investigation. The shocking pipeline information may explain why O'Neill became fixated about the Saudi-Taliban-Al Qaida relationship for the few remaining years of his life.
After O'Neill's investigations were repeatedly shut down by his superiors, O'Neill allegedly began making discreet inquiries to French intelligence using two reporters as cut-outs. Both reporters were known consultants for French intelligence and are specialists on both the oil industry and terrorism.
It is plausible that the French Government was upset at being shut out of the Caspian Basin deal, and may have been helping O'Neill behind the backs of his superior's in Washington. It does seem that the more that O'Neill learned, the less he was alowed to do with it.
The last straw was Cheney's refusal to follow up on O'Neill's request to pursue the leads in the Phoenix memo in April 2001. After resigning from the FBI in disgust, John O'Neil spoke candidly to several people, including the two French authors, whom he met again in July.
They have now written about the pipeline deal in "The Forbidden Truth." The book, not yet translated into English, quotes O'Neill as saying that his Al Qaida investigations were blocked to protect the Saudis. The Caspian Basin pipeline issue is discussed at length as the motive for the coverup.
I do not think that the French authors have the Atef document or they would have released it in their book. The Atef memo may indeed be a smoking gun, but I need to see the exact text to be sure before I release it to Congress.
This Al Qaida document may be the first hard evidence to break the Enron pipeline cover-up apart. I need your advice and confidential assistance in making a discreet collection of all Afghan pipeline research for a memo to present to Congress.
Originally posted by samkent
I would like to know why Cheney seems to be the whipping boy of 911.
Originally posted by thisisnotaname
shiftfrequency.com...-11302
The former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney.
edit on 21-6-2012 by thisisnotaname because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by 1BornPatriot
Israel played a part in 911, does not translate to israel did 911.
Originally posted by bjarneorn
Originally posted by samkent
I would like to know why Cheney seems to be the whipping boy of 911.
That's because he's already had several strokes, and likely do kick the bucket soon ... which makes him a good patsy.
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by samkent
Cheney is the "whipping" boy, because he ordered the Pentagon defence (the *last* line of defence) to stand down and allow the planes to hit.edit on 22-6-2012 by Sinny because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Screwed
At this point it doesn't matter if the President of the God Damned United States of motherfriggin America gets on T.V. during the half time of the Super Bowl and declares that it WAS indeed an inside job. and Dick Cheney flips us all the bird and says "yeah, I did it, whatcha gonna do about it"?
The people who do not want to believe this NEVER WILL!!!!
Period!!!
End of story.
Originally posted by samkent
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by samkent
Cheney is the "whipping" boy, because he ordered the Pentagon defence (the *last* line of defence) to stand down and allow the planes to hit.edit on 22-6-2012 by Sinny because: (no reason given)
NO HE DIDN'T!
His words were taken out of context.
You are reading those conspiracy sites that dave always mentions.
Go watch a Youtube vid of his actual words then come back. You will see conspiracy sites twist things to sell another DVD.
Originally posted by samkent
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by samkent
Cheney is the "whipping" boy, because he ordered the Pentagon defence (the *last* line of defence) to stand down and allow the planes to hit.edit on 22-6-2012 by Sinny because: (no reason given)
NO HE DIDN'T!
His words were taken out of context.
You are reading those conspiracy sites that dave always mentions.
Go watch a Youtube vid of his actual words then come back. You will see conspiracy sites twist things to sell another DVD.