It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Theophorus
This goes out to all you New agers.To be enlightened is to be aware. To have an awareness of something, one must have KNOWLEDGE of the existence of that something. In this case that something being enlightenment or awareness which in turn can only be boiled down to knowledge itself.Now, People are finite beings meaning we have limited boundaries. The knowledge we gain is also finite. Point being made is that in our finite state enlightenment is un-obtainable.Anyone looking into there finite self to find infinite knowledge is just kidding themself.
I truley dont understand what you are talking about. What do you mean by 'no things'. Are you talking about material things? What does 'one without a second'
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by Theophorus
Enlightenment is not about being aware of something. Enlightenment is about realizing that there are no 'things'.
Oneness has no 'things', it is one without a second.edit on 20-6-2012 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)
the tiny little ego self? Center of the psyche? Perceptions brought closer to accord with knowledge? What are you talking about? Please explain. In order to have a perception about something wouldnt it be reasonable to presume that something must be acknowledged in the first place. You must KNOW that something exists befofe you can preceive it.
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by Theophorus
This goes out to all you New agers.To be enlightened is to be aware. To have an awareness of something, one must have KNOWLEDGE of the existence of that something. In this case that something being enlightenment or awareness which in turn can only be boiled down to knowledge itself.Now, People are finite beings meaning we have limited boundaries. The knowledge we gain is also finite. Point being made is that in our finite state enlightenment is un-obtainable.Anyone looking into there finite self to find infinite knowledge is just kidding themself.
To be enlightened is to move your identity from the tiny little ego-self to the center of the psyche. That can be a scary journey from the insane perspective of the ego-self, which must die and be reborn. Based on your post I would guess that ego-self perspective is YOUR perspective.
As your identity moves from the ego-self to the center, the doors of perception become clearer and clearer. Perception, and your interpretations of perceptions, are brought closer to accord with KNOWLEDGE.
edit on 20-6-2012 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Theophorus
This goes out to all you New agers.To be enlightened is to be aware. To have an awareness of something, one must have KNOWLEDGE of the existence of that something. In this case that something being enlightenment or awareness which in turn can only be boiled down to knowledge itself.Now, People are finite beings meaning we have limited boundaries. The knowledge we gain is also finite. Point being made is that in our finite state enlightenment is un-obtainable.Anyone looking into there finite self to find infinite knowledge is just kidding themself.
Originally posted by Theophorus
I truley dont understand what you are talking about. What do you mean by 'no things'. Are you talking about material things? What does 'one without a second'
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by Theophorus
Enlightenment is not about being aware of something. Enlightenment is about realizing that there are no 'things'.
Oneness has no 'things', it is one without a second.edit on 20-6-2012 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Theophorus
the tiny little ego self? Center of the psyche? Perceptions brought closer to accord with knowledge? What are you talking about? Please explain. In order to have a perception about something wouldnt it be reasonable to presume that something must be acknowledged in the first place. You must KNOW that something exists befofe you can preceive it.
Originally posted by BlueMule
That process is found in world myth and religion time and time again...portrayed in symbolic form. It's called the monomyth. The best way to detect that process in religion and myth is by studying comparative mythology, comparative mysticism, and comparative religion.
Originally posted by NorEaster
Originally posted by BlueMule
That process is found in world myth and religion time and time again...portrayed in symbolic form. It's called the monomyth. The best way to detect that process in religion and myth is by studying comparative mythology, comparative mysticism, and comparative religion.
Oh...myth and religion. I see.
Okay then.
I wonder what myth and religion states as fact about the moon? About viruses and bacteria?
Damn, I'm glad I found this thread today.
logic and reality is awesome. Seems to me though your definition of the word infinity is incorrect. The word infinity is derived from the latin word infinitas which means unboundedness. With out boundries. This includes time and space. Only physical things are in time and space. Knowledge is not. Your little proof of an electron that doesnt collapes is meaningless. I am totally aware that the physical ceases to exist.this is why advaita and its teachings on enlightenment is not correct.
Originally posted by NorEaster
Originally posted by Theophorus
This goes out to all you New agers.To be enlightened is to be aware. To have an awareness of something, one must have KNOWLEDGE of the existence of that something. In this case that something being enlightenment or awareness which in turn can only be boiled down to knowledge itself.Now, People are finite beings meaning we have limited boundaries. The knowledge we gain is also finite. Point being made is that in our finite state enlightenment is un-obtainable.Anyone looking into there finite self to find infinite knowledge is just kidding themself.
Goodness!!!
Oh, did you know that the quantum (being a finite, indivisible unit of action, proven to exist over 100 years ago by its physical requirement, given the fact that electron orbits don't progressively decay into complete collapse) debunks the entire concept of the physical existence of infinity? It's true.
You can't prove the non-existence of infinity via expansion, but you can prove that it doesn't, and can't, exist via contraction - the required other expression of physical infinity. And 100 years ago, they did prove it. So much for any form of infinity, since infinity (if it is truly infinite) can't only be infinite in one direction.
Isn't logic and reality fun?
This goes out to all you New agers.To be enlightened is to be aware.
Originally posted by Theophorus
reply to post by BlueMule
our separateness from god is an illusion? Is god not infinite and we finite?and if that is the case wouldnt my perception of that statement be an illusion to?
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by NorEaster
Originally posted by BlueMule
That process is found in world myth and religion time and time again...portrayed in symbolic form. It's called the monomyth. The best way to detect that process in religion and myth is by studying comparative mythology, comparative mysticism, and comparative religion.
Oh...myth and religion. I see.
Okay then.
I wonder what myth and religion states as fact about the moon? About viruses and bacteria?
Damn, I'm glad I found this thread today.
I don't like your vibe and so I'll just point out the words 'symbolic form', which I USED... and point you to the book I linked to and leave you to them.
edit on 20-6-2012 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)