It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ronald Page seemingly had it made when Bank of America unintentionally changed his account status, allowing the 55-year-old man to make unlimited ATM cash overdraft withdrawals. But ABC News reports that Page, who in reality had only $300 in his checking account, used the accidental loophole to withdraw more than $1.5 million—losing it all on gambling.
In reality he should be held responsible, and a 15 month sentence is too light. He obviously knew he did not have the money, yet he continued taking the money out. Then to top it all off, he freaking gambled it all away...
Originally posted by Doom and Gloom
reply to post by boncho
So by your definition, if I go and take money from someone without them knowing it, it is classified as credit? Good to know.
He did this over the course of 6 months, it was no accident. He was fully aware of what he was doing. He did not apply for $1.5 million in credit, he stole $1.5 million dollars.
Originally posted by Doom and Gloom
reply to post by Doom and Gloom
Ronald Page seemingly had it made when Bank of America unintentionally changed his account status, allowing the 55-year-old man to make unlimited ATM cash overdraft withdrawals. But ABC News reports that Page, who in reality had only $300 in his checking account, used the accidental loophole to withdraw more than $1.5 million—losing it all on gambling.
So because he took advantage of an "accidental" loop hole the responsibility should not lie with him. It is 100% the fault of the Bank and the programmers that allowed this flaw in their software.
/sarcasm off
In reality he should be held responsible, and a 15 month sentence is too light. He obviously knew he did not have the money, yet he continued taking the money out. Then to top it all off, he freaking gambled it all away...
Originally posted by Doom and Gloom
reply to post by boncho
So by your definition, if I go and take money from someone without them knowing it, it is classified as credit? Good to know.
He did this over the course of 6 months, it was no accident. He was fully aware of what he was doing. He did not apply for $1.5 million in credit, he stole $1.5 million dollars.
As far as the banks are concerned, there should have been no bailouts. If they are making risky investment moves that are borderline illegal then the banks should be allowed to fail. They should not have been given money from the tax payer to continue the abuse of the tax payer.edit on 20-6-2012 by Doom and Gloom because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Doom and Gloom
reply to post by Doom and Gloom
Then to top it all off, he freaking gambled it all away...
Doubtful he gambled it away. Just think. You find alot of money that you will have to give back. The best way to keep this money is to say you gambled it away. Go to Vegas, spend $50k or so, get nice accomodations.... and voila. I lost it all. I was drunk. I don't remember etc. Works perfectly and there is nothing they can do to get it back. After 15 months, which is 7.5 month in California as criminals only do 50% prison time, he can go dig up his loot and enjoy a nice retirement all from the bank.
Smart guy and he did the right thing to keep the bank error.
Again, it's the great excuse for not having money... I gambled it away and lost. Yeah right!