It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A newly published book by journalist David Uren has revealed that the Australian government’s 2009 Defence White Paper contained a “secret chapter” that assessed “Australia’s ability to fight an air-sea battle alongside the United States against China.”
The chapter was omitted from the public version as it contained references to Australian forces assisting the US military to impose a naval blockade of China’s trade routes, and likely Chinese retaliation against targets on Australian soil. The existence of the confidential chapter was prominently reported on the front page of the Australian newspaper on Saturday under the headline “Secret ‘war’ with China uncovered.” Labor’s Defence Minister Stephen Smith was questioned about the revelation on Sunday. While he attempted to dismiss as “nonsense” the report that Australia had plans for war with China, he confirmed that there were both public and secret versions of the White Paper.
The war preparations motivated the White Paper’s recommendation that more than $100 billion be spent over the next decade or so to equip the Australian military with new submarines, destroyers, jet fighters and other advanced hardware.
the US Naval War College published a study in January 2011 which detailed Australia’s “numerous advantages” as a base from which the US military could control the vital sea lanes between the Indian and Pacific Oceans in the event of conflict with China. The study’s authors, James Holmes and Toshi Yoshihara, commented that “the Australian government—Washington’s most dependable ally in Asia, alongside Tokyo—would likely prove agreeable to such an arrangement.”
Originally posted by Mapkar
reply to post by stanguilles7
Fighting China is a terrible idea. I can't see why we would do that.
Besides, how would we get the money to do it? I'm sure China won't pay us to fight them
Originally posted by BobM88
reply to post by stanguilles7
Hmmm....I'd just read in that other thread how we refused to sell Australia weapons!
Originally posted by Mapkar
reply to post by stanguilles7
Fighting China is a terrible idea. I can't see why we would do that.
Besides, how would we get the money to do it? I'm sure China won't pay us to fight them
Originally posted by burntoast
not really U.S but only russia and chinas decision to attack
im sure for a fact obama will never go to war with china....
unless china attacks first you DIG
US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta that the US Navy will base 60 percent of its fleet in the Asia-Pacific underscores the strategic importance of access to Australian naval bases. Ports in Perth, Darwin and Brisbane will service the US aircraft carrier battle groups and nuclear submarines that threaten China’s access to crucial maritime trading routes.
Originally posted by Rosha
reply to post by stanguilles7
Steven Smith is a one eyed leech...a US/UK shill and hated by even his own party...he wont be around long enough to decide when we go to war or with whom.
edit on 16-6-2012 by Rosha because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Mapkar
reply to post by stanguilles7
The military may have a budget, but it doesn't hurt to wonder where the money they're spending comes from. I don't really see how we have enough export to generate THAT much income to have a budget like that. It's coming from somewhere, and we know China and the US have extensive monetary relations.
As far as your reason to go to war with China, sure there are people over three who want trade without Chinese influence... But, is that something we should be fighting for? We can only do so much, and the Chinese military is quite a large one. Sometimes you have to pick your fights.
Originally posted by Numbers33four
reply to post by stanguilles7
I had a comment then I saw your avatar. Bye.
The Battle of Chamdo (Chinese:昌都之战), also referred to as the invasion of Tibet, was a military campaign by the People's Republic of China against a de facto independent Tibet in Qamdo after months of failed negotiations.[9] The purpose of the campaign was to capture the Tibetan army in Chamdo, demoralize the Lhasa government, and thus exert powerful pressure to send negotiators to Beijing to sign terms recognizing Chinese sovereignty over Tibet
China's - let us invade Taiwan unopposed or we'll dump the dollar and bring about economic chaos. China holds $1.3 trillion of dollar denominated assets and leading Communist Party officials have repeatedly threatened to use what the London Telegraph referred to as "the nuclear option," the liquidation of US treasuries if Washington imposes trade sanctions to force a yuan revaluation, the result of which would be an almost certain and immediate collapse of the dollar.