It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ek Bharatiya
India has always tried to gain constructive foothold in Afghanistan by building roads, offices, transport etc.
then I dont know what you would call drone and missile attacks - a genocide perhaps?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by Ek Bharatiya
India has always tried to gain constructive foothold in Afghanistan by building roads, offices, transport etc.
AND...
So has the US going back decades as well. Building roads, offices and transports etc etc etc... So, according to your logic, if building roads, bridges, office etc is justification then the US has just as much right as India..
No?
Text
Panetta calls for deep US-India defence ties, more arms trade
Mr Panetta also called on New Delhi to modernise its defence procurement rules and nuclear liability legislation and said the Pentagon would work with Indian leaders to cut red tape and speed up defense sales.
"I think close partnership with America will be key to meeting India's own stated aims of a modern and effective defence force," he said.
The friendship between the world's two largest democracies is viewed with caution from Beijing, where some in government fear India is part of a U.S. strategy to limit China's rise on the world stage. India is spending about $100 billion over 10 years on modernising the military, in large part with an eye on China
Why escalating Chinese defence budget is ALARMING!
Originally posted by LastProphet527
reply to post by SLAYER69
TextChina, India, Iran wait to pounce on Afghan riches
I guess america is rubbing off !
Originally posted by GrandHeretic
reply to post by steve1709
Actually chuck, Bush wasn't the reason we went into Afghanistan, Clinton and his policies were...Bushy just inherited it..much like Obama inherited Bush's economic policies or lack thereof....which still doesn't make the Obamanator any better...actually he did worse than Bush on the economy.
Bush might have been a tard, but at least he knew when to let his cabinet do their job and advise him on the best course of action. Obama is kind of a ball hog and he doesn't like to share.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
This reminds me of Iraq all over again. The US/West does the fighting and dying while other nations move right in and take the booty. Iraq awarded the largest untapped oil fields to Russia and China now over in Afghanistan we get this report.
I'm sure glad President Kowtow is looking out for America's best interests. I'd hate to think what a President who wasn't would have done [Or not have done as the case may be]
Your thoughts?
www.sfgate.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by GrandHeretic
reply to post by LilDudeissocool
LOL you operate under some assumtion that I am conservative.....I am neither Liberal nor conservative....to put all of your eggs in one basket IMO is petty and the more one clings to a given party or affiliation just proves how they tend to lack depth.
I hate both sides of the fence equally, as for the afore post, just stating a well known fact.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
China, India, Iran wait to pounce on Afghan riches
February 15, 2003
Global protests against war on Iraq: People around the world demonstrate against the planning of war against Iraq. In Rome one million people take to the streets, in London one million. In Berlin there are half a million in the largest demonstration for some decades. There are also protest marches all over France as well as in many other smaller European cities. Protests are also held in South Africa, Syria, India, Russia, Canada and in the USA, in around 600 cities in total.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by yuppa
reply to post by Rocketman7
Oh you mean like Tibet has improved since China has practically taken over? They would be better of dead than be ruled by the reds. DIdnt the russians try this already? I smell a repeat.
"Frankly, we are not coming here to receive lessons in terms of democracy or in terms of how to handle the economy," he told reporters.