This Photo In Sryia Proves Its a Proxy War Against Russia and China. Rebels Showing There True Color

reply to post by Soshh



Terrorism is a politically-loaded term that usually equates to "paramilitary operations which I don't agree with". You can call it terrorism if you like.


Thats rich.
So rebels whom are making Home made Bombs which even CNN refuses to call them IEDs and where in that article people have noticed it Isn't Terrorism. I guess CNN would use the term Terrorism whenever fits there agenda in the region, specifically even your agenda.


I like how you took an unsourced one-paragraph history of Saudi Arabia and used it to guess at what Sunnis in Syria want

And you know what they want? they dont want to be secular.

As for why the SNC in Turkey had choose a Kurd as there leader isn't because they want the minoritiesto make them believe that they will be side by side after the war.

Its because the kurds want a kurdistan republic.

reply to post by Soshh


Seeing how you believe the propaganda by the mainstream news outlets every time remember this?

Originally posted by Soshh
snip
I like how you took an unsourced one-paragraph history of Saudi Arabia and used it to guess at what Sunnis in Syria want, but yes they'd probably take a system closer to Saudi Arabia over some Alawite-ruled Iranian satellite. If you were them then you'd want the same thing.

You shouldn't have said this considering your own posting style and behaviour.

Your photo post didn't include location, date and source either. After I posted date and location, you implicitly went on the attack by linking to google maps, as if I myself had said it wasn't from Syria.

I only provided background.

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Soshh

 

apart from Lebanon, Turkey, Jordan, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar et cetera?

You mean those small churches that were left after the fall of the ottoman empire? Turkey doesn't have a large Christian population like Sryia Does which is over ONE Million.

Turkey
Christian Population 0.13%
Muslim 96.83%
80-85% Sunni

Kuwait
67,500 Orthodox Christians, at least. The Greek Orthodox Church has about 3,500 members, while the Armenian Orthodox Church has about 4,000 members.

In Kuwait there is only just one cathedral.

No foreign missionary groups operate openly in the country. A board composed of members of all the Christian churches was formed to liaise directly with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on religious matters. The Christian population of Qatar forms around...

I'm well aware that the Christian minorities in those countries are quite small, however I was still correct. You were wrong and you've just done a nice job of outlining how wrong you were. It's starting to become a bit of a theme isn't it?

If Assad wasn't a secular The Christians would be long gone from Sryia either that or killed.

What do you base that on? I mentioned a number of countries with Islamist governments where Christians are neither long gone nor dead in a big pile.

Its clear that you support the Islamists.

I don't support either side. I've lost count of how many times I've said this.

Why are you just replying to me practically in this thread? while i have made several other threads regarding Sryia.

It's an especially good thread and I'm finding it immensely entertaining.

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Soshh

 

Thank you for showing your hypocritical side again.

Don't use words if you don't know what they mean. Nowhere was I being hypocritical.

but yes they'd probably take a system closer to Saudi Arabia
So a system that isnt even secular nor doesn't allow Christians to build Churches? yet in America, Bosnia we are allowing Saudi Arabia to build there mosques?

If Syrians don't want a secular government then why should they have one? A governmental system closer to Saudi Arabia (Sunni-dominated, possibly Islamist) doesn't necessarily mean a governmental system mirroring Saudi Arabia exactly. Churches are built in most countries with Islamist governments. Given the large Christian community and history in Syria, it would be virtually impossible for any government to prohibit churches and Christianity.

Your still doing the Iranian satellite compression just like a NeoCon does unfortunately.

What's that? Is it a dance similar to the Zionist Jig?

Iran is not threat.

A threat to what/who and in what respect?

If your saying that Sryia is Iran's satellite well guess what? America's satellite are Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar.

You fail in your argument.

A pro-US country ≠ A US satellite. In any case reeling off a list of pro-US countries does not even touch on the fact that Syria is an Iranian satellite.

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Soshh

 

Terrorism is a politically-loaded term that usually equates to "paramilitary operations which I don't agree with". You can call it terrorism if you like.

Thats rich.

It's true.

So rebels whom are making Home made Bombs which even CNN refuses to call them IEDs and where in that article people have noticed it Isn't Terrorism. I guess CNN would use the term Terrorism whenever fits there agenda in the region, specifically even your agenda.

I didn't catch most of that but yeah probably. I don't particularly care what CNN does to be honest.

I like how you took an unsourced one-paragraph history of Saudi Arabia and used it to guess at what Sunnis in Syria want
And you know what they want? they dont want to be secular

If they were allowed a real choice then you'd find out.

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Soshh

 

Seeing how you believe the propaganda by the mainstream news outlets every time remember this?

No I don't remember it, because we don't get Fox News in the UK. I certainly would have remembered that blonde at 12 seconds+. After her bit I got bored and stopped watching. What's your point?

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Sounds like your believing buying the mainstream propaganda on Sryia not surprised.

Pot calling the kettle black much? sounds like your believing buying the mainstream Russia Today state glorious media propaganda of Russia (Do not question glorious media)

Originally posted by uesvaje

Originally posted by Soshh
snip
I like how you took an unsourced one-paragraph history of Saudi Arabia and used it to guess at what Sunnis in Syria want, but yes they'd probably take a system closer to Saudi Arabia over some Alawite-ruled Iranian satellite. If you were them then you'd want the same thing.

You shouldn't have said this considering your own posting style and behaviour.

Your photo post didn't include location, date and source either.

Because it was a photo, it should have been clear where it was and the date was of no consequence. I didn't have a source and so there was nothing to link anyway.

After I posted date and location, you implicitly went on the attack by linking to google maps, as if I myself had said it wasn't from Syria.

I only provided background.

That's a bit dramatic. I would hardly refer to a link to Google maps as 'going on the attack'. I already knew when and where the photo was taken and it was actually you who posted as if I didn't.

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Soshh

 

Terrorism is a politically-loaded term that usually equates to "paramilitary operations which I don't agree with". You can call it terrorism if you like.

Thats rich.
So rebels whom are making Home made Bombs which even CNN refuses to call them IEDs and where in that article people have noticed it Isn't Terrorism. I guess CNN would use the term Terrorism whenever fits there agenda in the region, specifically even your agenda.


I like how you took an unsourced one-paragraph history of Saudi Arabia and used it to guess at what Sunnis in Syria want

And you know what they want? they dont want to be secular.

As for why the SNC in Turkey had choose a Kurd as there leader isn't because they want the minoritiesto make them believe that they will be side by side after the war.

Its because the kurds want a kurdistan republic.

edit on 15-6-2012 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)

So according to the VERY loose definition of terrorism.

1.
the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.
2.
the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3.
a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government. Source

(and your refusal to address the central point of his/her arguement) The 1st and 3rd points in this definition could be applied to the american revolution, congratulations you're a terrorist nation founded by terrorists Good Job.

I just found this vid...looks fake to me.....I don't know who to believe...
Aftermath Following an Artillery Attack by Assad Forces (Daraa,Syria) (June 15th, 2012)

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Soshh

 

Seeing how you believe the propaganda by the mainstream news outlets every time remember this?

Ironic, seeing as you believe it anytime it is anti-American and Pro-Russian or Bosnian Serb.

reply to post by sanic9k1


I see are you friend of Soshh? seems like my thread hit a Nerve in you people. Well thats good.

Originally posted by stanguilles7

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Soshh

 

Seeing how you believe the propaganda by the mainstream news outlets every time remember this?

Ironic, seeing as you believe it anytime it is anti-American and Pro-Russian or Bosnian Serb.

And apparently you would believe anything and agree with Saudi Arabia,America.

Originally posted by ManicDepresive1
I just found this vid...looks fake to me.....I don't know who to believe...
Aftermath Following an Artillery Attack by Assad Forces (Daraa,Syria) (June 15th, 2012)

Good find, it does look fake, blood smeared upon, No wounds, seems that article about faking the fooage on June 15 were true.

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


who to believe???.......maybe the Ruskies know a little more then US on what is happeing so they are going in to protect thier stuff...IDK....
Hey would you post a thread about that vid. I wonder what other think of it??? I cant post yet...thx if you do.

reply to post by Soshh


If Syrians don't want a secular government then why should they have one?
So Soshh what your saying you would rather want an Radical, Islamist Government in Power? as in Egypt? more rather it seems you would prefer the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Muslim Brotherhood which have ties to terrorists.

Don't use words if you don't know what they mean. Nowhere was I being hypocritical.

Yes you were your two posts are showing it. Including this post.

if Syrians don't want a secular government then why should they have one?

What do you base that on? I mentioned a number of countries with Islamist governments where Christians are neither long gone nor dead in a big pile.

Thats because Those Islamist governments aren't allowing Christians to spread any further despite having those half of the percent of the christian population.

Most of those Christians don't even live in the city in the countries that you mentioned and once again you have avoided the issue of Saudi Arabia.

Not surprising.

Your mind games wont work on me Soshh.

And get this through your head America is no longer the Good Guy as it once used to be.

Originally posted by stanguilles7

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Soshh

 

Seeing how you believe the propaganda by the mainstream news outlets every time remember this?

Ironic, seeing as you believe it anytime it is anti-American and Pro-Russian or Bosnian Serb.

Another thing we are on page 11 with nearly of 100 pages, i have defended my arguments but apparently you have an agenda on here Hench the length of the discussions and we are now moving away from on topic to off topic.

So whats your agenda? and again i have made several threads on about Sryia and yet nowhere have i had these many replies because of that image at the first post on Page 1.

as you believe it anytime it is anti-American and Pro-Russian or Bosnian Serb.

So stanguilles7 You do know that Serbs in sarajevo were cleansed by the Muslims? and there Saudi Arabia backers?



www.sarajevo-september.com...

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


I say "If Syrians don't want a secular government then why should they have one?"

You reply with "So Soshh what your saying you would rather want an Radical, Islamist Government in Power? as in Egypt? more rather it seems you would prefer the Muslim Brotherhood.

Can you see where you went wrong there? I gave you a bit of help matey.

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter

Originally posted by stanguilles7

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Soshh

 

Seeing how you believe the propaganda by the mainstream news outlets every time remember this?

Ironic, seeing as you believe it anytime it is anti-American and Pro-Russian or Bosnian Serb.

Another thing we are on page 11 with nearly of 100 pages, i have defended my arguments but apparently you have an agenda on here Hench the length of the discussions and we are now moving away from on topic to off topic.

So whats your agenda? and again i have made several threads on about Sryia and yet nowhere have i had these many replies because of that image at the first post on Page 1.

as you believe it anytime it is anti-American and Pro-Russian or Bosnian Serb.

So stanguilles7 You do know that Serbs in sarajevo were cleansed by the Muslims? and there Saudi Arabia backers?



www.sarajevo-september.com...

edit on 15-6-2012 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-6-2012 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-6-2012 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)

Uh...newsflash russia is balls deep involved in syria so it is still on topic and by the way how does a printed sign = terrorist? christ you tinfoil hatters the problem i have with you guys is.
1.The sources of information you get are from the faux noose equivilent of russia RT the state media of russia I mean I know russian TV in general is bad but this takes the cake do you remember when sirte was falling and RT said it was "Sound bombs" I # you not Actual Sound bombs ... don't believe me here is a link.LOL bombs
2.The validity of the source you post are at best 25% accurate because most of them are from russia today or world news weekly or (worst of all) from the paper of the country that is under extreme pressure to deny that noone likes assad.
3.Your attitude of (and this is you specificly) "HURRR AMERICA STRONG BUT ONLY WHEN I NEED IT OTHERWISE AMERICAH SUCKS TEH RUSKIE COCK LOL INVADE AMERICUH IDGAF"

reply to post by sanic9k1


Oh and I'm not a friend of shoushe or w/e his name is just because people don't like your attitude don't go making assertions you can't back up....no infact stop posting it's less effort xD XD XD XD XD XD X D XDDDDDD

reply to post by Soshh

I say "If Syrians don't want a secular government then why should they have one?"

Is that what the mainstream media told you? if the media says Syrians don't want Assad it must be true. Again i already defended my arguments.

Your just going back in circles without any valid points.

reply to post by sanic9k1


Your argument is like a wall of text no offence, next time write it a little better if you want me to take you Seriously.

Uh...newsflash russia is balls deep involved in syria so it is still on topic and by the way how does a printed sign = terrorist?

So Is Israel, Saudi Arabia, America, Turkey, now the question whats there true agenda?