It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Websites will soon to be forced to identify people who have posted defamatory messages online.
New government proposals say victims have a right to know who is behind malicious messages without the need for costly legal battles.
The powers will be balanced by measures to prevent false claims in order to get material removed.
I wish we knew who we were talking to on social media I think it would make social media more honest. I think we should all get a internet id and we should not be able to post anything online that is anonymous. The id would be required to log onto the net so different ip addresses would not matter. People would know who you are no matter what computer you are on. I have had many insults here on ATS. I think this would happen less if people had a face or identity and were not hiding behind an avatar. Its only a matter of time since they are already arresting people for the things they post on twitter and facebook. I will be happy to lose the right to anonymity. I will be happy that all the cowards do. it will be awesome. Its a form of verbal assault that happens on sites like this very often. It should stop. And people should always know that there are potential consequences for their actions.
"The government wants a libel regime for the internet that makes it possible for people to protect their reputations effectively but also ensures that information online can't be easily censored by casual threats of litigation against website operators.
"It will be very important to ensure that these measures do not inadvertently expose genuine whistleblowers, and we are committed to getting the detail right to minimise this risk."
Originally posted by SmoKeyHaZe
New government proposals say victims have a right to know who is behind malicious messages without the need for costly legal battles.
Originally posted by Domo1
Short of threats you should be able to say whatever the hell you want online. Let it be up to individual sites how they deal with perceived trolls. No one needs the government protecting them from having their precious little feelers hurt. Good luck defining troll. On many a website *ahem* people with dissenting viewpoints are routinely called trolls. I didn't read the article so I may be way off. I don't care, I just want to see myself talk.