It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Danbones
if god is ok with all the dead indians and broken treaties that resulted in America and Canada then
IMHO ANY nation he supports deserves to lay forever in the dustbin of history
Since god and the bankers have been on both side of every war since when ever and no matter what country wins the peeps all lose...while the kissing cousin royalty and the priests and preachers and the bankers laugh all the way to the bank....
The problem with the premise in the OP is the dancing Israelis
and the millions of dead Muslims and their stolen properties justified by murder, and the bearing of false witness as justification....
America's and Israel's claims to any moral high ground are simply spurious and worse
edit on 12-6-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)edit on 12-6-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WhoKnows100
OP, I pray that your inspired words reach some reading. What they don't understand is that Jesus came for the lost sheep of the House of Israel - many our forefathers. What they can't understand or believe is that what was, will be again. What they fail to see is that the grand kids of faithful Christians have been attacked by Balaam's deceit - that they've been made Godless simply by the enticement of sin and spiritual adultery. They laugh as they reject their saviour yet they unknowingly have accepted Satan and the beast.
The Israel of God have always believed in their Messiah.
Your thread was very inspiring to me, and I do hope that it makes a few uneasy to see our nation's declared intent - we have been encompassed by the enemy of God for a long while now, and the shout to repent from evil will grow louder.
Originally posted by stupid girl
Originally posted by Danbones
if god is ok with all the dead indians and broken treaties that resulted in America and Canada then
IMHO ANY nation he supports deserves to lay forever in the dustbin of history
Since god and the bankers have been on both side of every war since when ever and no matter what country wins the peeps all lose...while the kissing cousin royalty and the priests and preachers and the bankers laugh all the way to the bank....
The problem with the premise in the OP is the dancing Israelis
and the millions of dead Muslims and their stolen properties justified by murder, and the bearing of false witness as justification....
America's and Israel's claims to any moral high ground are simply spurious and worse
edit on 12-6-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)edit on 12-6-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)
Thank you for your response, Danbones.
Having a significant amount of Native American ancestry, I appreciate your sentiment regarding the massacre of America's Native civilization. The book I based my OP on, specifically addresses the fact that America, as a nation, is not without fault and has committed dispicable acts by the hands of fallible and misguided men. But it also points out the fact that the wheat grows alongside the tares, and America has brought much more light and liberty into the world than not.
I disagree with you that God is on the side of the bankers. But I fully agree with you that they are laughing all the way to the bank.
I also do not share your ill will towards the nation of Israel. I feel that they have a right just like any other human being to freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Although how those individuals go about it may not necessarily be the most prudent way to do so, especially when it infringes those very rights of others. That we can agree on.
For the purpose of my OP, I must point out that Islam was not a nation in 732 BC, so the premise of the original purpose of their nation still holds, IMO.
Also, the point of my OP is the lack of moral high ground in America, and the lack of moral high ground in ancient Israel, both of which, likely led to their eventual destruction.
Thank you again, Danbones, for the discussion.edit on 12-6-2012 by stupid girl because: (no reason given)
Text
The view that Islamic terrorism predates U.S. action and is justified by Quranic teachings
An alternative argument is that anti-American terrorism predated the rise of the United States as a global power and is justified by the Quran. This is exemplified by the events leading to the First Barbary War. Muslim pirates of Algiers, Morocco, Tunis, and Tripoli Barbary Coast had attacked, enslaved and held American merchant sailors for ransom, soon after the establishment of the United States of America in 1776 (see First Barbary War). These terrorist-type attacks predated any U.S. involvement in the islamic world and occurred before the US had been involved in any overseas military action. In 1786, future U.S. Presidents Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli’s envoy to London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman in an attempt to negotiate an end to the piracy. Adams and Jefferson summarized their meeting in a letter dated March 28, 1786 to John Jay, the United States Secretary of Foreign Affairs:
"We took the liberty to make some enquiries concerning the ground of their pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation. The Ambassador [of Tripoli] answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (muslims) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise."[20]
These diplomatic engagements suggest that a modern Jihad-like ideology existed prior to any U.S. involvement in the Islamic world, and that the Koran was used to justify this ideology.
Thus, according to critics of Islam, islamic terrorism is linked to the practice of divinely sanctioned warfare against apostates.[21][22] Many Muslim groups including the Council on American-Islamic Relations argue that references to violence in Muslim sources have been taken out of context.[23][24][25] They argue that these Koranic ayahs are only for self-defense when non-believers endanger Muslim life. While a debate may exist on the proper interpretation of Koranic verses, the terrorist actions leading to the First Barbary War and the justification provided by Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman, provide an early example where the Koran was used to justify anti-American terrorism. These events occurred at a time where the U.S. had yet to intervene in the Muslim world and argue against U.S. policy as a fundamental cause of islamic terrorism. On the contrary, the historical timeline demonstrates that the very first U.S. engagement with the Muslim world was an American response to Islamic terrorism
Egyptian records report the departure of about 240,000 people from northern Egypt to the Near East sometime after Amhose had evicted the Hyksos army, probably about the middle of the 16th century BCE .
The biblical exodus roughly equates to the reigns of Thutmose III/ Hatsheput or possibly to the latter years of Thutmose II.None of the Egyptian records for their reigns mention the departure of hordes of people to the Near East.The only Egyptian documentation that has any resemblance to the biblical exodus is the exodus during the reign of Amhose. Whether Egyptian and Hebrew scribes were recording the same event is a moot
A century of research by archaeologists and Egyptologists has found no evidence which can be directly related to the Exodus captivity and the escape and travels through the wilderness,[16] and most archaeologists have abandoned the archaeological investigation of Moses and the Exodus as "a fruitless pursuit".
Shlomo Sand's 'The Invention of the Jewish People' is a success for Israel
Some may be surprised to find that Sand's goal is to preserve Israel as a democracy with a Jewish character.
Yes, Jewish public consciousness continues to be formed by the idea that Jews were exiled from Israel by the Romans, whereas the truth is that close to two million Jews continued to live here until the fall of the Roman empire. Yes, a large portion of the Roman Empire Jews became Jewish by conversion, and hence most Jews today are unlikely to be descendants of Jews who lived here two thousand years ago. But, as Sand repeatedly points out, none of this is disputed by historians.
Yes, the Zionist narrative has created a semblance of continuity between the Jews living in Israel two thousand years ago and modern Jews, much more than actually exists.
Originally posted by HODOSKE
did you read the Harbinger book by Cain? I read it when it first came out and found it pretty fascinating. I am not an expert on the Bible so i wasnt sure if the detailed quotes were all true. Do you know if the book is true? it said in the beginning that it was true but written in a fictional format which makes me wonder what parts are true and what parts aren't
Text
The Exodus (Greek ἔξοδος, exodos "way out", Hebrew: יציאת מצרים, Modern Yetsi'at Mitzrayim Tiberian [jəsʕijaθ misʕɾajim] Y'ṣiʾath Miṣrayim ; "[the] exit [from] Egypt") is the story of the departure of the Israelites from ancient Egypt described in the Hebrew Bible.
Narrowly defined, the term refers only to the departure from Egypt described in the Book of Exodus; more widely, it takes in the subsequent law-givings and wanderings in the wilderness between Egypt and Canaan described in the books of Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.
Numbers and logistics
According to Exodus 12:37-38, the Israelites numbered "about six hundred thousand men on foot, besides women and children," plus many non-Israelites and livestock.[9] Numbers 1:46 gives a more precise total of 603,550.[10] The 600,000, plus wives, children, the elderly, and the "mixed multitude" of non-Israelites would have numbered some 2 million people,[11] compared with an entire Egyptian population in 1250 BCE of around 3 to 3.5 million.[12] Marching ten abreast, and without accounting for livestock, they would have formed a line 150 miles long.[13