It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Quauhtli
reply to post by TheSparrowSings
On a smaller planet it would be much easier to control the population as well as make sure that the place was well taken care of, but on a bigger one, there would be more room for diversity and evolution, I'm on the fence. I would probably choose a much bigger one than earth if I could find one.
Originally posted by Quauhtli
reply to post by yourmaker
What if the earth was turning into a rust bucket? It's possible you know, and the room to move is getting smaller by the minute, last chance, there aren't many ships left. They are pretty bomb proof ships by the way. Don't worry they were built by Bowing. The chances of crashing are less than getting hit by lightning.
The state of the technology -
I would want to know the tech that we run has failsafe guidance systems. Tested.
We would have had to establish contingency plans for our contingency plans for me to even consider stepping foot on an ARK.
The state of society -
If it's complete anarchy or mass extinction then I would have no choice.
If a scientific endeavour or government experiment I would decline unless I had a specific duty to fufil.
The state of the planet -
The Earth's decay wouldn't be a sudden occurance.
If there was room for improvement, I wouldn't hesitate in staying behind.
I wouldn't be worried about crashing.
I would be worried about oxygen, water, gravity, radiation, home sickness, insanity.