It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
All i know is folks on here take every news statement to indicate imminent war or WWIII while at the same time, the same folks on here cristicize the news as inaccurate. LMAO!!!!! Cant have it both ways bo!!! You want one article to serve your paranoid agenda yet another article that opposes your view is met with "well its the news they always lie".
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by princeofpeace
First two sentences in the OPs source:
Speaking in Kabul yesterday, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta threatened Pakistan with a ground intervention
Originally posted by princeofpeace
All i know is folks on here take every news statement to indicate imminent war or WWIII while at the same time, the same folks on here cristicize the news as inaccurate. LMAO!!!!! Cant have it both ways bo!!! You want one article to serve your paranoid agenda yet another article that opposes your view is met with "well its the news they always lie".
If its not a ground war, what do you think the US action would be if Pakistan continues to not follow orders from their ally?
If its not a ground war, what do you think the US action would be if Pakistan continues to not follow orders from their ally?
And then at
posted on 6/9/2012 @ 07:51 PM
you say that the thread should be shut down cause,
posted on 6/9/2012 @ 08:03 PM
.. seriously? Cause noone repsonded to your crap post that basically bashes people instead of putting some sort of quality opinion out there within 12 Minutes, that the thread should be shut down??
Yall aint got nothing for that one
Originally posted by GrandHeretic
reply to post by Nspekta
Two words sir,
Air Strikes..................................................................
Originally posted by Nspekta
Originally posted by princeofpeace
All i know is folks on here take every news statement to indicate imminent war or WWIII while at the same time, the same folks on here cristicize the news as inaccurate. LMAO!!!!! Cant have it both ways bo!!! You want one article to serve your paranoid agenda yet another article that opposes your view is met with "well its the news they always lie".
Really? I asked you in a previous reply"
If its not a ground war, what do you think the US action would be if Pakistan continues to not follow orders from their ally?
Yet you side step it.. ATS if for relaying info, and discussion. If you don't think he is threatening ground forces, fine. you have your opinion... But don;t come into threads posting that its all bs, and then don't answer legit questions. So I ask you again,
If its not a ground war, what do you think the US action would be if Pakistan continues to not follow orders from their ally?
Yes, he didn;t say he would send in ground forces but he said they are fed up with Pakistan, when asked he didn't rule out ground forces as a method of response to Pakistan.. SO, what is going on then? Is it an empty threat? Does this mean a hardened continuation of drone attacks with civilian casulaties until Pakistan gives in?
I like that you say close the thread, because you don't agree with what was said or the interpretation of what was said. Thats your problem dude..
*Added* Your 'solid' repsonse to this thread was posted atAnd then at
posted on 6/9/2012 @ 07:51 PMyou say that the thread should be shut down cause,
posted on 6/9/2012 @ 08:03 PM
.. seriously? Cause noone repsonded to your crap post that basically bashes people instead of putting some sort of quality opinion out there within 12 Minutes, that the thread should be shut down??
Yall aint got nothing for that one
If anyone wants to see the quality of this guys opinions and threads, take a look at his last posted thread, complete waste of time, and space on the server, and he is complaining about this thread?! This thread has potential for discussion and speculation, your last thread.. well check it out for yourself:
Holly Springs intersection closed after chase, wreck
Maybe you should ask them to close that very informative thread? BTW, you you have 12 minutes to respond, since thats what you feel is acceptable amount of time to give people before asking to close the thread.. GO
edit on 6/10/2012 by Nspekta because: added
Stockpile
Estimates of Pakistan's stockpile of nuclear warheads vary. The most recent analysis, published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists in 2010, estimates that Pakistan has 70-90 nuclear warheads.[60] In 2001, the U.S.-based Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) estimated that Pakistan had built 24–48 HEU-based nuclear warheads with HEU reserves for 30-52 additional warheads.[61][62] In 2003, the U.S. Navy Center for Contemporary Conflict estimated that Pakistan possessed between 35 and 95 nuclear warheads, with a median of 60.[63] In 2003, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace estimated a stockpile of approximately 50 weapons. By contrast, in 2000, U.S. military and intelligence sources estimated that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal may be as large as 100 warheads.[64]
The actual size of Pakistan's nuclear stockpile is hard for experts to gauge owing to the extreme secrecy which surrounds the program in Pakistan. However, in 2007, retired Pakistan Army's Brigadier-General Feroz Khan, previously second in command at the Strategic Arms Division of Pakistans' Military told a Pakistani newspaper that Pakistan had "about 80 to 120 genuine warheads."
*** *** ***
Second strike capability
According to a US congressional report, Pakistan has addressed issues of survivability in a possible nuclear conflict through second strike capability. Pakistan has been dealing with efforts to develop new weapons and at the same time, have a strategy for surviving a nuclear war. Pakistan has built hard and deeply buried storage and launch facilities to retain a second strike capability in a nuclear war.[68]
It was confirmed that Pakistan has built Soviet-style road-mobile missiles, state-of-the-art air defences around strategic sites, and other concealment measures. In 1998, Pakistan had 'at least six secret locations' and since then it is believed Pakistan may have many more such secret sites. In 2008, the United States admitted that it did not know where all of Pakistan’s nuclear sites are located. Pakistani defence officials have continued to rebuff and deflect American requests for more details about the location and security of the country’s nuclear sites.
Originally posted by Nspekta
reply to post by princeofpeace
Oh I'm sorry, you exceeded your '12 minute' time limit.. sorry your opinion is null and void... As per your OWN WORDS!
Text Your answer: No ground war.Air strikes AT THE MOST. But even that wont happen. Now you can shut it down
Originally posted by Nspekta
reply to post by princeofpeace
Of course you have nothing to say because you risk looking like an idiot again!
Text Your answer: No ground war.Air strikes AT THE MOST. But even that wont happen. Now you can shut it down
Btw genius, they ALREADY do airstrikes (drones) all the time in Pakistan so, you saying airstrikes at most, but even that wont happen, just proves that you have no knowledge of this topic. Please troll somewhere else.