It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Any ideas on what this is near the sun?

page: 2
3
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 12:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Bilk22
 


Is the particle visible before striking the sensor?

No.


If not then how do you explain the two images? Using your explanation it would be a singular event.

No. It is two separate events. Cosmic ray strikes are random events. Did you notice that your "object" does not appear on the two frames in between the ones you posted?


Does the sensor have the capability of capturing images faster than the speed of light?

I don't understand what you mean. The particle does not move at the speed of light. It excites pixels of the sensor as it moves through them.




The object is clearly the same in both images. They are sequential and the object is the same shape, only smaller in the first as it's farther away. I don't believe it's what your explanation is claiming it to be. This is why I'm asking the community for some assistance. To see if it's a three dimensional object or a "flash" for lack of a better term.



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 12:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by RoScoLaz
i often see these things on EIT pics. i'm not qualified to definitively identify them, but i find some of them interesting;



same closeups in an animated gif;




Oh now that's pretty cool. It's the same object. Where is that from and what dates are associated with them?






posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 12:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Bilk22
 


They are sequential

No. Here are the two intermediate frames.



They are random.
edit on 6/9/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 12:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Bilk22
 

I edited it because of your more recent post. It seemed appropriate to put it in my response to that.
You can search the image database here:
sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov...


How do I search the data base for those two specific images? That's where I have trouble as I don't get them in my results.

Edit: Ok found them. They are still there. Thanks.

edit on 9-6-2012 by Bilk22 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 02:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
It is nothing near the Sun.
They are the result of cosmic rays striking the CCD sensor. This has been explained in the many, many threads about "things" near the Sun.


Nothing near the sun, that I buy ...

Cosmic rays hitting the CCD? Phage, that's nonsense, pardon my french ... you make it sound, like the camera is a cheap China made stuff, that hasn't undergone any testing, and has unfiltered cosmic rays hitting the camera ccd sensor directly without damaging the sensor.

If that is true, I don't know what the heck you guys are doing ... but it most certainly is time to have you guys replaced. Because that just sounds like pure crap, if I ever heard any ...

edit on 9/6/2012 by bjarneorn because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 02:09 PM
link   
reply to post by bjarneorn
 


you make it sound, like the camera is a cheap China made stuff, that hasn't undergone any testing, and has unfiltered cosmic rays hitting the camera ccd sensor directly without damaging the sensor.

Why?

It is important to mention that the CCDs used by LASCO operate at -80± C, which allows them to capture the very faint coronal light . This makes them very sensitive to energetic particles (EPs), some of which are accelerated from solar processes (SEPs). The EPs show up as streaks in the image. The cool temperature, however, also lets the CCD recover quickly from such saturations
(Howard et al. 1997).

solar.njit.edu...

edit on 6/9/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Bilk22
 


these are from the OP's two pics.



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 02:25 PM
link   
aliens they bouta come feast on us
(



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 02:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage

Why?



Because it basically means the images you get, are not to be trusted ... that equally applies to images of the sun, as other images.

Phage, you should know that. Space is nothing, but, cosmic rays ... and especially around the sun, about everything there is cosmic rays ...

This basically says, Phage ... back to the drawing board.



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   
reply to post by bjarneorn
 


Phage, you should know that. Space is nothing, but, cosmic rays ... and especially around the sun, about everything there is cosmic rays ...

Basically, what you said makes no sense whatsoever.



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 02:52 PM
link   
reply to post by bjarneorn
 





Because it basically means the images you get, are not to be trusted ... that equally applies to images of the sun, as other images.


And why can they not be trusted?



posted on Jun, 9 2012 @ 04:30 PM
link   
I can't remember the name of the movie that was purported to be prevented by the government from being published, but this looks like the ship in that movie. It had wings like a bird.

*been searching for the name of the movie as only the trailer was uploaded to Youtube.

i116.photobucket.com...

PS: Why can't I publish images stored on Photobucket directly into the post?
edit on 9-6-2012 by Bilk22 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 12 2012 @ 06:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Bilk22
 


i think it's '1 annunaki'




edit on 12/6/12 by RoScoLaz because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 12 2012 @ 06:37 PM
link   
Ah that's it. Thanks.


Originally posted by RoScoLaz
reply to post by Bilk22
 


i think it's '1 annunaki'




edit on 12/6/12 by RoScoLaz because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 1   >>

log in

join