It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
reply to post by LifeIsEnergy
I don't find anything profound about those people, even though I used to be buddhist.
I've never seen anything that constitutes pure being before in my life.
To me it's simple: No one has authority when it comes to truth. Not jesus, not buddha, not itsnowagain, me etc. We don't have a right to it.
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
Originally posted by LifeIsEnergy
reply to post by ImaFungi
Thanks, that was an interesting read, but I think this sentence sums that article up nicely: "There is also good reason to believe that Nietzsche’s knowledge of Buddhism was inaccurate and incomplete..." Anyone who sees Buddhism as "life-denying and nihilistic" clearly has no understanding of the Dhamma.
Peace.
You haven't read his work. You cannot refute something until you have at least read it.
I don't agree with much of what Nietzsche wrote, but he makes good points on why Buddhism and Christianity are fundamentally nihilisticedit on 11-6-2012 by LesMisanthrope because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LifeIsEnergy
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
Originally posted by LifeIsEnergy
reply to post by ImaFungi
Thanks, that was an interesting read, but I think this sentence sums that article up nicely: "There is also good reason to believe that Nietzsche’s knowledge of Buddhism was inaccurate and incomplete..." Anyone who sees Buddhism as "life-denying and nihilistic" clearly has no understanding of the Dhamma.
Peace.
You haven't read his work. You cannot refute something until you have at least read it.
I don't agree with much of what Nietzsche wrote, but he makes good points on why Buddhism and Christianity are fundamentally nihilisticedit on 11-6-2012 by LesMisanthrope because: (no reason given)
I cannot speak for Christianity. But the Buddha explicitly taught the Middle Way, between the eternalist and the nihilist. If you were to go too far towards nihilistic views, he would teach you how that will lead to suffering and then explain the values of living a compassionate and virtuous life. If you moved too far towards the eternalist viewpoint, he would teach you about the emptiness of all phenomena. If you fell back towards the nihilistic viewpoint, he would teach you about the emptiness of emptiness. All teachings are a means to promote non-attachment to views. There is no room to claim what he was teaching is Nihilistic. In fact, just for you, I will make a thread dedicated to this very topic, sometime this week.
Peace.