It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by marcsnothere
omg. Read people, read. Then read again, and again and again
"In a case being heard by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Obama administration argued that since the Supreme Court’s ruling didn’t specifically mandate the obtaining of a search warrant in all situations, then the justices intended to leave a loophole open — a loophole large enough to mount a tracking device"
Obama wants a MANDATE for a search warrant for ALL SITUATIONS.
Obama Administration Argues No Warrant Required for GPS Tracking of Citizens
The federal government informed an appeals court on Thursday that it has the right and the power to place GPS tracking devices on the privately owned vehicles of citizens without obtaining a warrant.
Originally posted by randomname
first of all, a gps tracker doesn't tell you who is driving the car, so it is unreliable as evidence.
i also wonder what would happen if i clandestinely installed a gps tracker on obamas armored limo, since he see's nothing wrong with that.
edit on 4-6-2012 by randomname because: (no reason given)[/quote
It being unreliable is a boon to the jack boots, it gives them another excuse to dial it all in tighter and link a name and number to all of our movements. They won't be satisfied until we all have our barcodes so they can scan and track and collate and quantify our entire lives. Data mine, data mine, data mine.
Originally posted by ConspiracyBuff
Is Obama the worst constitutional law professor of all time? Or is it just me…