It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
roniii259
I think that we should instead work on enlarging and improving the B-2, because it is available now and not in a decade.
Originally posted by The Scottish Investigator
Intelearthling that is the pic i tried to put up but wudnt work so gave the link.
Originally posted by Intelearthling
Is this the picture on your other PC?
originally posted by: ghost
I have spent years studing Black aircraft and strategic bombers. Hopefully I can add something meaningful to this discussion. I will start with some background. The B-3 is supposed to be the newest stategic bomber, and will allow the USAF to eventually retire the B-52. The US bomber fleet has always relied on a three aircraft strategy. There is a primary penetrator, that is used to engage the air defenses and critical command targets. The second aircraft is provides the main striking power and the third aircraft usually takes over as the workhorse bomber and cruise missile platform. Let's see what the LRSA/B-3 turns into. I've been trying to keep an eye on this program for a few years now. I bet the Prime Contractor will be one of two companies: Northrop Grumman or Lockheed Martin
Personally I think the Best choice would be to have the B-3 Co-developed by Northrop Grumman's Advanced Systems Division and Lockheed's Skunk Works!
While not currently a "Black" program, the B-3 is Special Access. This means that you need a special clearance to get access to information about the aircraft. In other Words "Look but Don't Touch!" this Could change as it develops. (Remember: the XST A.K.A. Have Blue wasn't a Black Project when it first started, It only went Black after Lockheed won the contract)
Tim
ATS Director of Counter-Ignorance