It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dawnprince
Gonna keep this short and sweet .
If 9/11 was truly an act of foreign terrorists , why attack the towers at such an early time ? surely if they wanted to be sure of maximum loss of life , they would have attacked when the towers were sure to be more populated .
The fact that only a fraction of the possible deaths occurred smacks of somebody sacrificing the few to fulfil their aims.
It's like breaking into the national treasury , but only stealing all the dimes .
It's been a nagging thought that won't go away .
edit on 30-5-2012 by dawnprince because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by maxella1
Originally posted by dawnprince
Gonna keep this short and sweet .
If 9/11 was truly an act of foreign terrorists , why attack the towers at such an early time ? surely if they wanted to be sure of maximum loss of life , they would have attacked when the towers were sure to be more populated .
The fact that only a fraction of the possible deaths occurred smacks of somebody sacrificing the few to fulfil their aims.
It's like breaking into the national treasury , but only stealing all the dimes .
It's been a nagging thought that won't go away .
edit on 30-5-2012 by dawnprince because: (no reason given)
Could it be that the airports are busier during early hours and they though that there would be less chances of getting caught ?
I don't think they cared how many they kill, they just needed to really scare American people. And they succeeded.
If 9/11 was truly an act of foreign terrorists , why attack the towers at such an early time ? surely if they wanted to be sure of maximum loss of life , they would have attacked when the towers were sure to be more populated .
How about this for a reason. They are rebuilding a tower 'One world trade center'
Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by dawnprince
I think that at night there is less flight than in the morning. So the airport employees have more time at night to really check passengers and that means more chances to get caught.
Originally posted by dawnprince
Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by dawnprince
I
These were supposedly suicidal maniacs remember . They weren't bothered about being caught , only fulfilling their assignment .
This makes no sense.If they weren't worried about getting caught how could they fullfill what the set out to do?Don't you think they made damn sure they didn't get caught?By your logic you could also ask why didn't they pick planes with more people on them for more deaths? Fact remains after the first strike,as someone pointed out,there was time for people to evacuate.So of course you're going to have less deaths.I don't entirely buy the official story but some of these theories are way harder to believe.edit on 30-5-2012 by nightstalker78 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dawnprince
Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by dawnprince
I think that at night there is less flight than in the morning. So the airport employees have more time at night to really check passengers and that means more chances to get caught.
Wait . you can't have it both ways .
Either they chose the time they did , not to get caught or they chose the busiest time to blend in and risk having less of impact on the world stage ?
These were supposedly suicidal maniacs remember . They weren't bothered about being caught , only fulfilling their assignment .
Originally posted by Maxatoria
the towers were the target so it didn't matter what time of the day it happened it just mattered that that the planes hit their target
Originally posted by Maxatoria
reply to post by dawnprince
the point of terrorism aint to cause as much death as possible but to get the best vantage point for your views so if people had woken up to the fact the towers had been knocked down then it would of had less impact than being able to have all the OMG sort of stuff
Originally posted by jazz10
reply to post by dawnprince
Yep, but thats not everything. Far from it.
Think of economy and not only rebuilding ventures. Think of those at the top of the economy at the moment. Technology.
From technology we need certain minerals.
Lithium for example, remind me what is lithium used for and if you were to control lithium where would that put you financially?
Lithium seams? where? Afghanistan?
That is just the tip of the iceberg.
I made an interesting find a day or 2 ago that may be of no suprise.
I will post the link to the reply i made on another thread. Take it as you wish but, me........I think this one event had more than one motive. Many birds with one stone.
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by P-M-H
How about this for a reason. They are rebuilding a tower 'One world trade center'
So we should leave the WTC site an empty hole in the ground ?
Stupidest thing I've heard....
Originally posted by snowspirit
IF the "terrorists" were the ones that flew into the buildings, they wouldn't have cared whether or not the buildings were full or half empty.
How would they have expected the buildings to go into such a perfect freefall straight down?
IF it were "terrorists" they wouldn't have expected anywhere near even half of the destruction that happened.