It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Around midnight on May 21, 2010, a girl named Fatima was killed when a succession of U.S.-made Hellfire missiles, each of them five-feet long and traveling at close to 1,000 miles per hour, smashed a compound of houses in a mountain village of Mohammed Khel in North Waziristan along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. Wounded in the explosions which killed a half dozen men, Fatima and two other children were taken to a nearby hospital where they died a few hours later
Behram Noor, a Pakistani journalist, went to the hospital and took a picture of Fatima shortly before her death, then went back to the scene of the explosions looking for evidence that might show who was responsible for the attack. In the rubble, he found a mechanism from a U.S.-made Hellfire missile, and gave it to Reprieve, a British organization opposed to capital punishment, which shared photographs of the material with Salon. Stafford Smith alluded to the missile fragments in an Op-Ed piece for the New York Times last fall. They have also been displayed in England.
Originally posted by FreeFromTheHerd
reply to post by Nspekta
There are many more important matters to worry about instead of drone strikes in the mid east.
Given the current path our government is on, we should applaud the fact the strikes are half a world away instead of them happening here at home, which truly wouldn't surprise me.
“President Obama made clear from the start to his advisers and to the world that we were going to take whatever steps are necessary to protect the American people from harm, and particularly from a terrorist attack,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said.
"It's a wild oversimplification that lacks context," an aide to the president said of the Times article, which was published Tuesday and claimed that the commander-in-chief has "embraced a disputed method for counting civilian casualties." "This story is debating whether there are zero civilian casualties or eight," the White House official told Fox News -- in effect suggesting that whatever the actual number of civilian casualties caused by the president's use of drones, the incidence of collateral damage is dramatically reduced under the Obama command.
Originally posted by FreeFromTheHerd
reply to post by Nspekta
Of course it would bother me if that was my daughter, or if I knew her. But on the flip side of that coin, is your life really that problem free that a person dying, whom you do not know, nor would you ever know, bothers you that much?
How many hours of sleep will you lose tonight over this drone strike?
All of this faux outrage over events that do not impact peoples daily life here is simply laughable.edit on 30-5-2012 by FreeFromTheHerd because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FreeFromTheHerd
reply to post by Nspekta
Of course it would bother me if that was my daughter, or if I knew her. But on the flip side of that coin, is your life really that problem free that a person dying, whom you do not know, nor would you ever know, bothers you that much?
How many hours of sleep will you lose tonight over this drone strike?
All of this faux outrage over events that do not impact peoples daily life here is simply laughable.edit on 30-5-2012 by FreeFromTheHerd because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
reply to post by FreeFromTheHerd
so the fact that the POSUS and Co.
are psychopaths that get off on murdering and torturing
people willy nilly doesn't concern you?
sigh, birds of a feather i suppose...
Originally posted by FreeFromTheHerd
reply to post by Nspekta
Of course it would bother me if that was my daughter, or if I knew her. But on the flip side of that coin, is your life really that problem free that a person dying, whom you do not know, nor would you ever know, bothers you that much?
How many hours of sleep will you lose tonight over this drone strike?
All of this faux outrage over events that do not impact peoples daily life here is simply laughable.edit on 30-5-2012 by FreeFromTheHerd because: (no reason given)
“Forensically, it is important to show how the crime of murder happened (which is what it is here),” said Reprieve executive director Clive Stafford Smith in an email. “One almost always uses the murder weapon in a case. But perhaps more important I think this physical proof — this missile killed this child — is important to have people take it seriously
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Nspekta
I agree with you. I don't need, nor want this protection. But, Romney just won the Texas primary, and has apparently wrapped up the nomination.
If Ron Paul is not elected, then these drone strikes will not only keep happening in the Middle East, they are liable to start happening here too!
Short of a violent revolution, what are our options as citizens that disagree with these actions?
Originally posted by Texcin
Its not about dying its about MURDER. I dont know this girl but it does bother me that my tax $ paid to murder this innocent life. Christians whine about tax $ going for condoms, but gladly give their $ to kill. We look the other way and tell ourself...we dont know her....its callateral damage...it was an accident.....its her parents fault ....its part of war and so on. Your hands may look clean but they are covered in karma.