It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MollyMN
This is pretty neat.
I think there are some structures on Mars and some on the moon.
Some could be in use?
Out of the 1000s upon 1000s of photos NASA takes of Mars,they always give us the crappy ones or they are photoshoped to be blured,distort them,change the color,etc.
What do they do with the other 1000s of the photos they don't show us?
Be nice if was not so spendy to send probes there?
Be cool if we had our own sattlelite and it was not goverment owned to take photos for us?
S&F
Originally posted by Arken
Originally posted by Human_Alien
I cannot nor will not believe these are the best and clearest photos NASA has.
Their technology is at minimum 50 more years in advance than what we're aware of so by them not producing cleared photos of Mars and the Moon it's almost their way of guaranteeing us they're hiding something!
Looks like we have to wait until a less agenda-driven country captures better photos for the world to see because America won't give it up because they heavily rely on the Vatican for decisions and direction.
You put your finger into a Wasp Nest, my friend....
Originally posted by MollyMN
This is pretty neat.
I think there are some structures on Mars and some on the moon.
Some could be in use?
Out of the 1000s upon 1000s of photos NASA takes of Mars,they always give us the crappy ones or they are photoshoped to be blured,distort them,change the color,etc.
What do they do with the other 1000s of the photos they don't show us?
Be nice if was not so spendy to send probes there?
Be cool if we had our own sattlelite and it was not goverment owned to take photos for us?
S&F
Originally posted by jazz10
reply to post by dashdespatch
Do you really think that we are the only ones that are capable of this? thats why its a blur.
In this case, the researchers use the device to cloak a bump one micrometre (one thousandth of a millimetre) high
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by GLontra
If you use Google Earth, you can clearly recognize the cars in the parking lot of the headquarters of Google Inc in California. The pictures, in color, were taken by satellites in orbit of Earth.
No. If you can clearly see cars you are looking at aerial photographs.
The resolution of satellite imagery (of Earth) provided to the public is limited to 50cm by the DoD. The same resolution seen in the image above. There are both lunar images and images of Mars of much better resolution than that.
You may want to have a look here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...edit on 5/30/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
Originally posted by dashdespatch
reply to post by Arken
How do you know they have been degraded? do you have any evidence or are you just guessing
its logic that if there are sensitive photos taken the actuals will not be released to general public especially if a concern with EA*RTH security is @ hand. So it makes sense that the images are degraded yes?
"The Google Librarian Central site has up a piece by Mark Aubin, a Software Engineer who works on Google Earth. Aubin explains some of the process behind capturing satellite imagery for use with the product. 'Most people are surprised to learn that we have more than one source for our imagery. We collect it via airplane and satellite, but also just about any way you can imagine getting a camera above the Earth's surface: hot air balloons, model airplanes - even kites. The traditional aerial survey involves mounting a special gyroscopic, stabilized camera in the belly of an airplane and flying it at an elevation of between 15,000 feet and 30,000 feet, depending on the resolution of imagery you're interested in. As the plane takes a predefined route over the desired area, it forms a series of parallel lines with about 40 percent overlap between lines and 60 percent overlap in the direction of flight. This overlap of images is what provides us with enough detail to remove distortions caused by the varying shape of the Earth's surface.'
Originally posted by sputniksteve
reply to post by Human_Alien
How exactly would disclosure cuase them to "lose control"? You think we're all going to be offered free space sbip rides off planet or something? Normal everyday life wouldn't really change. Still have to go to work and pay taxes and buy groceries and fill the ford up with gas on the way to walmart. That is just wishful thinking.
By the way if you read the bible Adam and Eve is a story, not a documentary written in real time. Nobody is going to argue they were real people, it says so right before Genesis begins.
Also you forgot to blame something on the Jews.