It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The UN announced its budget for feeding the over one million Somali refugees under its care for the next year and have allocated less than 10 cents a day per refugee to do so.
Anthony Lake, once nominated to head the CIA, now UNICEF supremo, held a press conference in April 2012 to declare a budget of $35 million for the next year to feed the Somali refugees in its care, over one million and growing by the day.
And all the while the UN is funding the 20,000 man strong African Union army “pacifying” Mogadishu to the tune of over $350 million, $30 million a month and counting.
The UN created these refugees in the first place, sending in the Ethiopian army in 2006 to bring fire and sword to newly peaceful Somalia, followed by the UN dispatched relief forces, now over 15,000 from Uganda, ever since 2008.
Half a million Somali refugees created by the Ethiopian army, another half a million created by the UN/AU “pacification” of Mogadishu and now, following the worst drought and famine in 60 years, less than 10 cents a day to feed the lot.
Originally posted by LondonerBLV
How about they feed themselves? Problem solved. We dont have to help.
Originally posted by LondonerBLV
How about they feed themselves? Problem solved. We dont have to help.
Originally posted by GLaDOS
Originally posted by LondonerBLV
How about they feed themselves? Problem solved. We dont have to help.
You didn't have to steal as well, you know how much Britain has stolen from the world? it's time to give it back.
Originally posted by Nspekta
The UN announced its budget for feeding the over one million Somali refugees under its care for the next year and have allocated less than 10 cents a day per refugee to do so.
Anthony Lake, once nominated to head the CIA, now UNICEF supremo, held a press conference in April 2012 to declare a budget of $35 million for the next year to feed the Somali refugees in its care, over one million and growing by the day.
And all the while the UN is funding the 20,000 man strong African Union army “pacifying” Mogadishu to the tune of over $350 million, $30 million a month and counting.
The UN created these refugees in the first place, sending in the Ethiopian army in 2006 to bring fire and sword to newly peaceful Somalia, followed by the UN dispatched relief forces, now over 15,000 from Uganda, ever since 2008.
Half a million Somali refugees created by the Ethiopian army, another half a million created by the UN/AU “pacification” of Mogadishu and now, following the worst drought and famine in 60 years, less than 10 cents a day to feed the lot.
Source
UM, 10 cents a day!!!? WTF?
Honestly, living anywhere, even with subsidies, what could you possibly eat for 10 cents a day!?
The article goes on to discribe how these refugees were created by the actions of the UN within their country, and now the UN has 'responsibility' for them, and decides that 10 cents a day should be enough to feed these people. Unbelievable!
This is anothe example of Agenda 21 coming into place and the attempts at mass population reduction within Africa, among other parts of the world. Considering the fact that many were displaced by the UN, and then they can't even allocate enough funds to feed them properly, its sad
Thoughts!?
Originally posted by CALGARIAN
Originally posted by LondonerBLV
How about they feed themselves? Problem solved. We dont have to help.
Never heard of Colonialism I see.
Hmm... I must have missed that. When did the British colonize Somalia?
Originally posted by GLaDOS
Originally posted by LondonerBLV
How about they feed themselves? Problem solved. We dont have to help.
You didn't have to steal as well, you know how much Britain has stolen from the world? it's time to give it back.
Even if I bought into what you say, they never colonized Somalia. Thus have no responsibility there.
Originally posted by GLaDOS
Firstly, I'm not anti-white, but you can't deny history. Britain has stolen so much mainly from Egypt and India. Then people act ignorant and say "we don't have to give anything"...
Originally posted by GLaDOS
Firstly, I'm not anti-white, but you can't deny history. Britain has stolen so much mainly from Egypt and India. Then people act ignorant and say "we don't have to give anything"...
Originally posted by blueorder
Originally posted by GLaDOS
Back to the point at hand without this needless anti British nonsenseedit on 29-5-2012 by blueorder because: (no reason given)
I'm not anti Britain Im just anti the colonial leadership that was around in Britain back then.
Originally posted by GLaDOS
I'm not anti Britain Im just anti the colonial leadership that was around in Britain back then.
The past is past. Live for the future.
Originally posted by GLaDOS
I'm not anti Britain Im just anti the colonial leadership that was around in Britain back then.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by blueorder
Because socialists are only generous with other people's money. Not their money. That is untouchable.