It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by popsmayhem
Aussie is taking a step in the right
direction. The carbon tax seems to low
to make a difference though as of now
to help make the planet greener.
The carbon tax needs to be doubled
in australia so these corporate leeches
have to pay for dirtying up the air and ground..
Anyone not for saving the enviroment should
be sent to the moon anyways.. Pay your fair share
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by Nspekta
..., as posted earlier, that energy is taxed, which increases the costs, which must be sucked up by retailers for fear of being fined for speaking out and explaining to people why they needed to raise prices
Not even slightly.
As has been mentioned multiple times now, if there is a legitimate reason for rasing prices (such as the enrgy costs you mention) that is a perfectly legitimate reason for raising prices *by that degree* and no "fear of being fined" by mentioning it.
Originally posted by Nspekta
So, if thats the case, what is the point of even threatening such a huge fine??
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by Nspekta
So, if thats the case, what is the point of even threatening such a huge fine??
As has been mentioned multiple times now, it is to prevent prices being raised for no reason whatsoever and falsely blaming the new tax. And to prevent the raising of prices above what the impact of the tax genuinely is.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Nspekta
..Australia actually passed a Carbon Tax? WTF is wrong with you people? Carbon Tax and Healthcare are the two reasons I NEVER vote for a Progressive Liberal. All they want is your money and obedience.
Originally posted by stanguilles7
If they blamed the carbon tax they must be able to prove it and not use it as a cover for other price increases related to wages, rent or stock.
"If a business claims that a price is linked to the carbon price, that claim must be truthful and have a reasonable basis,'' he said.
Sounds more like a 'truth in advertising rule' than anything else. Sounds kinda reasonable to me; If you lie about your costs, you face a fine'.
If you increase your costs and then just blame it on the 'carbon tax', you may have to prove it's just the carbon tax, and not you price gauging. Bureaucratic, for sure, but reasonable in its logic.
They arent saying you cant blame the carbon tax, just that you cant blame it for your own price gauging. Of course, I agree it gives the gov. even more power. Most laws do.edit on 28-5-2012 by stanguilles7 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jazzguy
i heard the carbon tax is NATO related. meaning that right now countries give nato money but nato has to go through a lot of BS to get it and they want the tax from carbon to fund nato activities.
anyone heard that before?
we might be one of the happiest countries on the list but we are definetly the stupidestedit on 29-5-2012 by jazzguy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by alfa1
Once you get past the sensationalism of the article, the truth is more appealing.
Companies are not allowed to use the new tax as a LIE, an EXCUSE, to raise prices to grab more money from the consumer when it is not warranted. If the new tax genuinely raises prices, then it is most certainly allowed to be blamed. It certainly can be blamed it it is the truth.
I like this new ruling, it protects the consumer from conmen who would raise prices for no proper reason.
We had the same thing when the GST came in many years ago. It was not allowed to be used as a false excuse to raise prices. If it was a geniune reason that the GST caused prices to be raised, then that is perfectly proper to blame it