HAARP Manipulates Time-Physicist Dr. Fran De Aquino: (Very Interesting-if you can understand it)

Originally posted by PurpleChiten
forget it, you're not capable of comprehending, so there's no reason to bother with you any further

edit on 27-5-2012 by PurpleChiten because: (no reason given)

Just gonna say "I told you so"

Lastly, it won't matter because it doesn't support the "magic". Look what happened when I questioned where the "magic" was coming from. And you are suggesting the "magic" itself isn't real.

I do wonder if BuddahSystem thinks that this "Time manipulation" is real? Do you think that Fran here is "on the level" and these math equations we have DO show how to manipulate time?

Will help me follow the conversation, cause it sure looks like a believer vs skeptic argument to me. Complete with subtle ad-hominems and everything.

PS: That makes you both pretty smart...(seriously!)

Reason the Dept of Defense didnt give any support towards The Avengers. It was actually more realistic than Battleship.
Supersoldiers-true
Portals-True
Genetic tampering-true
Unlimited free energy-true


These are exciting times indeed.

Originally posted by superluminal11
Reason the Dept of Defense didnt give any support towards The Avengers....

Because it was a movie...for entertainment and not education?

That would be why they didn't support it, or do you mean something other than monitary support?

Did the DOD actually speak out against this movie?

I guess what I am asking for, is a source (IE proof for this claim).

EDIT (To thank!)
Thanks for the linky!!
VVVV

Originally posted by adigregorio

Originally posted by superluminal11
Reason the Dept of Defense didnt give any support towards The Avengers....

Because it was a movie...for entertainment and not education?

That would be why they didn't support it, or do you mean something other than monitary support?

Did the DOD actually speak out against this movie?

I guess what I am asking for, is a source (IE proof for this claim).

proof of claim

You have to read through what they are actually telling you and this comes from spiritual energy. We all have it.

SHIELD is a sort of Secret DOD outside the military in the movie but military in nature. HAARP is sort of a SHIELD but much more. CERN is involved as well.

Originally posted by superluminal11
SHIELD is a sort of Secret DOD outside the military in the movie but military in nature. HAARP is sort of a SHIELD but much more. CERN is involved as well.

Wait wait wait, in what shape or form is CERN involved? What division, piece of hardware or personnel? I'm very curious. Please let me know?

Originally posted by superluminal11
Unlimited free energy-true

This is no more true than unlimited free Kool Aid for all.

Great thread on an interesting and fav topic at ATS.

Awesome responses.... also. Thank you for you insights.

The thread started off a bit rough but went on pretty well.

I learned several things but mostly I am conerned about the unknown abilities that HHARP may have... in saying we don't know, I mean the common people. I am sure the Govt's go it going on..

Originally posted by anon72
I am sure the Govt's go it going on..

Why are you sure?

Am I the only one who is baffled by the fact that this guy, Fran de Aquino, a University professor with papers published in peer-revised journals, has written an article teaching how to build a device that partially BLOCKS the gravitational force?

It can be downloaded here:

frandeaquino.org...


Is everyone missing the elephant in the room?

It's ANTI-GRAVITY!

Originally posted by GLontra
Am I the only one who is baffled by the fact that this guy, Fran de Aquino, a University professor with papers published in peer-revised journals, has written an article teaching how to build a device that partially BLOCKS the gravitational force?

It can be downloaded here:

frandeaquino.org...


Is everyone missing the elephant in the room?

It's ANTI-GRAVITY!

a) You linked to a paper which applies formulas derived elsewhere, see item "b"
b) Aquino published his controversial theory through this outlet: www.akamaiuniversity.us... which is unusual for a serious physics paper. From that link I get a feeling that their body of reviewers is small and the review is often done by staff at Akamai University. That University is not US-accredited and does not specialize in natural sciences, so the choice of venue for the publication is all the more surprising.
c) I read another paper of Aquino where he claims to have measured gravity effect when using current at 60Hz (obtain from mains). This is in stark contrast to what's in the paper, where he insists now that ELF must be used for optimal effect. This is highly suspect imho.

reply to post by buddhasystem



I guess that cern.ch is the official domain of CERN in the Internet, right?


Well, check this link from cern.ch:

cdsweb.cern.ch...


Do you think it adds some credibility to Professor De Aquino?

I don't know if he's right, but he sounds like a serious scientist...

reply to post by anon72

You need to stay off beforeitsnews.com and get some fresh air.

Originally posted by GLontra
reply to post by buddhasystem

 

I guess that cern.ch is the official domain of CERN in the Internet, right?


Well, check this link from cern.ch:

cdsweb.cern.ch...


Do you think it adds some credibility to Professor De Aquino?

I don't know if he's right, but he sounds like a serious scientist...

I don't think it adds weight to his studies. He's a real person, we know that much. The document server at CERN keeps records of plethora of particles, preprints and communications, without attesting to their veracity. By the way there are a lot more records in that database referring to my publications than de Aquino has. And I'm not a great scientist by any means.

reply to post by buddhasystem


I say we have ATS Radio/Media schedule him for an interview!!!!!

Who do we see about that?

I think it would be fascinating-on many levels.

Originally posted by anon72
reply to post by buddhasystem

 

I say we have ATS Radio/Media schedule him for an interview!!!!!

Who do we see about that?

I think it would be fascinating-on many levels.

Great idea.

It would be great to have this guy exposing his ideas here on ATS.

According to his personal website, his e-mail is [email protected]

reply to post by GLontra


Got it. Will ponder what to do.

I think it would be best I email him first-get a feel for him.

Then if all good, I'll find someone in the ATS world who may be able to schedule a radio interview or recording etc.

If not ATS, then Who, I ask?

Thank you for you work on it.

To add: I wonder if the Forum Mods check on these things or give advice on something. The silence, of either possitive or not-when a member has a potential good idea,... I look at it as we all on the same team-striving for truth/knowledge/education etc.... but.. I'm in one heck of a good mood today so....

reply to post by anon72


Better yet, why don't you yourself schedule an interview with him?

Get a list of questions from posters in this thread that they would like asked, audio record your interview after ascertaining the most requested, make a podcast out of it, then ask the ATS staff if you could somehow link it here?

Just a thought.

Originally posted by alphabetaone
reply to post by anon72

 

Better yet, why don't you yourself schedule an interview with him?

Get a list of questions from posters in this thread that they would like asked, audio record your interview after ascertaining the most requested, make a podcast out of it, then ask the ATS staff if you could somehow link it here?

Just a thought.

What's remarkable about de Aquino's papers is that the effects he's predicting (even though he contradicts himself on occasion) are quite large. It's not some sort of super sensitive measurement that is needed to confirm or disprove his theory. Question is, why doesn't he find a few thousand Euro, do an experiment and publish it in a peer-reviewed journal? That's a small price to pay for a Noble prize and the title of the greatest physicist of all time.

So, that would be one question to ask him.

Another is how come he insists on ultra-low frequency as most efficient for gravity shielding in one paper, and uses 60Hz in another?

Third, how does he feel about putting an iron object (in same paper) next to a conductor carrying 40A current? That's what he did. Would it not result in appreciable force exerted on the yoke by the magnetic field? I'm asking because he's trying to prove gravity shielding by measuring the net weight of this yoke, and yet it's subject to a potentially large force produced by the apparatus itself.

Originally posted by roadgravel

Incredible HAARP energy vortex warps a cloud

Kidding, right. Any proof that is real? When this stuff is added as facts, I have to question it all.

You don't read very well...do you?
vixra.org...

When you're done with that, you can attempt to explain to me what is incorrect with his mathematics...

Originally posted by Iluna

Thoughts?

Look at the source - beforeitsnews.
The only thought that pops up: why do people still link articles from that site

vixra.org...