It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
Originally posted by diddy1234
A question for everyone in this thread :-
Looking at history, Hitler got lots of support and eventually into power when Germany was in a depression.
So is there a chance that a socialist government getting into power now that capitalism is on its last legs ?
btw, I didn't like how hitlers ideas turned out, I am just asking if this is a ripe time for socialism / Nazism to become more popular.
capitalism isn't on it's way out, fascism just took it's place for a while. there can be no free market unless we reorganize the legislature in a way that eliminates lobbying and corporate involvement on every level. corporations also must be stripped of their status as citizens which they clearly are not.
lots to be done but it can be done once this farce of a government has collapsed under it's own weight of dirt.
Originally posted by babybunnies
Originally posted by Germanicus
Originally posted by Starwise
reply to post by Germanicus
What is BRIC?
Sorry. Its Brazil,Russia,India,China,South Africa. All of these nations have come together. They are the core but many other less powerful nations support them like nations from Africa and South America. All these countries are a new power base. They will take over from America and Europe when the next GFC hits.edit on 23-5-2012 by Germanicus because: (no reason given)
What do they have in common? Massive natural resources, Brazil has energy independance, China owns a large portion of the Western World's debt, China and India both have a huge emerging middle class, South Africa has major political problems but massive natural resources that can be exploited.
Originally posted by Germanicus
Its all about faith. America and the West will have none when the next GFC hits. It will be worse than last time. The IMF and World bank will collapse. The BRICS nations can trade amongst themselves. they are more than just Brazil,Russia,India,China and South Africa. Many nations hate America. South America is full of them Venezuella and Chavez hate American Imperialism. They are with the BRICS. Cuba, Argentina,even the South American nations that support the United States officially dont like them. Then there is Africa. America took out Libya so it could not introduce the African Dinar. But there are many other Nations that will follow South Africa and side with the BRICS.
The BRICS Bank is the key to it all. The BRICS will not collapse when the West does. The BRICS nations and their allies will be the new power. America will have to hand over the Reserve Currency.
The standard of living will drop dramatically in America very soon no matter what happens.
Originally posted by Germanicus
reply to post by grey580
Im just saying that the BRICS have many friends already. Cuba and Venezuela are among them. Venezuela has a massive amount of oil by the way. And Cuba are not a nation to take lightly. The BRICS will not collapse when Europe and America do. The BRICS have many friends. The BRICS have a firewall. The BRICS have their own bank.
I am wondering how long it will be before they vreate their own currency. The African dinar was called a threat to the economic security of the world by Sarkozy. Thats why they had to go to Libya.
How long before a BRICS currency emerges to topple the US dollar? They must be planning it.
Its only a matter of time before the US sees hyperinflation. The Leaders of the United States must adress spending and National Debt with real solutions before its too late. China will overtake the US as the worlds largest economy in just a few years. America has a few years at best to save itself. At best.edit on 23-5-2012 by Germanicus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Eversince after Vietnam war, every little boy outside USA and some within, with a grade 6 education has claimed 'America is on its last legs'.
Nothing new here. Move along. Just another thread to earn an egoistical OP petty little flags and stars.
USA does have problems. No denying it. BUT so too every single nation on Earth right now. Thing is, when the chips are down, where do humans put their money where their mouth is? None other than USA. The Treasury is loaded with with savings worldwide guaranteed by USA. It has the most gold kept in reserves amongst other nations.
The problems of America is only structural, and not systemic. The sacred Constitution is still adhered to, where change is possible every 4 years, from a state councillar to the President. And americans are an adaptable, educated and resiliant free people that is not adverse to change, for changes are the only constant in life, but those changes must bring stability to society to achieve all humanity's common goals in life, and had been doing so for centuries, which earned trust and respect worldwide time after time.
Unfortunately, I cannot say the same for the rest of the world. Tyrants abound, clinging onto power with lies and brutuality to its masses. One down and as usual, another takes its place...
BRICS as hope? Even my toes are laffing. Russia, ruled by a tyrant where change simply means the president exchange seats with the PM? India - the hot bed of corruption where even the masses are highly angered with now? China - a totalitarian state where rule of law is whomever in the CCP leadership say is law at the moment? Brazil - with a few minority rich and the cronies ruling the masses mired in poverty? Can they even get their act as a nation, let alone together as a stable monetary union?
Which is why until today, after so many years, there are no 'BRIC' dollars, nor forseeable in the future, nor will even be trusted by merchants.
.edit on 23-5-2012 by SeekerofTruth101 because: (no reason given)
Sure Venezuela has oil. But Chavez is practically giving it away to his people. How is he going to make any money of oil in his own country? It's like he's giving away money.
Originally posted by Germanicus
reply to post by grey580
Sure Venezuela has oil. But Chavez is practically giving it away to his people. How is he going to make any money of oil in his own country? It's like he's giving away money.
See thats the key. Because we all live in a capitalist society it seems strange to us that a Nation would provide cheap oil for its people. If you look at many countries they do things like this. I think the BRICS nations will create a better world. The big four Oil Corporations ExxonMobil,Shell,Chevron and BP make all the money in the world. Its demonic. And they do everything they can to give as little back to their countries as possible. they will dodge any tax they can. In many other countries the Oil is nationalized. This means the profits go back to the people. Why shouldnt we all ahve cheap fuel? some things should not be for profit. If we nationalized the big Four Oil Corporations the profits will save the West no problem. So why do we allow them to rape our nations? China and the BRICS protect their industries from corporatists. The BRICS claim to be against Imperialism and I believe them. They have had to endure it. I think they will create a more fair world. America should not be subsidizing American Rice to sell to Haiti to undercut a Haitian peasant. I think in time the BRICS wil oversee a far more fair world than the one that America created.
You're making the BRIC countries sound like knights in shining armor. And they are not. Most of those countries are more dangerous and corrupt than than anything you can imagine.
/quote]
As opposed to the USA, where you can't get a bill passed in Congress without massive lobbying (bribing) and where gun related crime is higher than any other nation on the planet?
Originally posted by babybunnies
You're making the BRIC countries sound like knights in shining armor. And they are not. Most of those countries are more dangerous and corrupt than than anything you can imagine.
As opposed to the USA, where you can't get a bill passed in Congress without massive lobbying (bribing) and where gun related crime is higher than any other nation on the planet?
Well we fought off Japan ourselves. When your hero American General took charge of our soldiers he left them to die. McCarther was a coward. Dugout Doug. We didnt need your navy because the Japanese decided invasion of our mighty continent was impossible.
Originally posted by Partygirl
reply to post by Starwise
B = Brazil R = Russia I = India C= China. All rising new powers, increasing economically while the "developed world" stagnates.
Originally posted by VforVendettea
Start transacting business in rubels, yuan etc and abandon using the Federal reserve note or any other currency in the Feds clutches.
Starve the beast and the beast will die.
Originally posted by omega man
Australia to be more specific Queensland will be the launch of the New World Order.
Originally posted by Zippidee
reply to post by Germanicus
Your thread title got me to click. Your first post was good and definitely shores up some progressions and lays out the timeline and lends to the speculation of the outcome. But, and this is a big BUT!!! your post where you more or less rip the USA gets me peaved to no end.
America offers nothing. We need to cut ties. All our alliance with America does is make us a target in this region and it risks our economy. We should form an official alliance with the BRICS
Listen Pal....Trace your countries success to this point, or at least the economic advantage it has now and I think you will see alot of it has to do with the ANZUS treaty as well as the Australian-USA FTA agreement! Not to mention that your country was one of the recipients of the GM Bailout!
I don't deny what you lay out for us....I accept it and agree it just hurts a little when instead of trying to band together and fix our problem, you want to kick us to the curb and forget who helped you in the past. Thats alot like Italy, always switching sides to whoever's winning!
Australia is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, ranked in the top 10 in gross domestic product per capita.
It is also one of the most isolated major countries in the world; occupying an entire continent, is difficult to invade and rarely threatened.
Normally, we would not expect a relatively well-off and isolated country to have been involved in many wars. This has not been so for Australia and, more interestingly, it has persistently not been the case, even under a variety of governments.
Since 1900, Australia has engaged in several wars and other military or security interventions (including the Boer War, both world wars and those in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq), lasting about 40 years in total.
In only one of these wars, World War II, was its national security directly threatened, and even then a great deal of its fighting was done in places such as Greece and North Africa rather than in direct defence of Australia.
This leaves us to wonder why a country as wealthy and seemingly secure as Australia would have taken part in so many conflicts.
To understand Australia, we must begin by noting that its isolation does not necessarily make it secure.
Exports, particularly of primary commodities, have been essential to Australia. From wool exported to Britain in 1901 to iron ore exported to China today, Australia has had to export commodities to finance the importation of industrial products and services in excess of what its population could produce for itself.
Without this trade, Australia could not have sustained its economic development and reached the extraordinarily high standard of living that it has.
It must trade to sustain its economy and, given its location, its trade must go by sea. Australia is not in a position, by itself, to guarantee the security of its sea lanes.
It therefore encounters two obstacles. First, it must remain competitive in world markets for its exports. Second, it must guarantee that its goods will reach those markets. If its sea lanes are cut or disrupted, the foundations of Australia’s economy are at risk.
This challenge has guided Australian strategy. First, Australia must be aligned with – or at least not hostile to – the leading global maritime power. In the first part of Australia’s history, this was Britain.
More recently, it has been the United States. Australia cannot afford to give the global maritime power any reason to interfere with its access to sea lanes.
Second, and more difficult, Australia needs to induce the major maritime power to protect Australia’s interests more actively.
It must make the major power dependent upon it so that Australia has something to offer or withdraw to shape the major power’s behaviour. Given the propensity for major powers to engage in war, they are always in need of additional forces, bases and resources.
A nation that is in a position to contribute to the global power’s wars is in a position to secure concessions and guarantees. For a country such as Australia that is dependent on sea lanes for its survival, the ability to have commitments from a major power to protect its interests is vital.
Deployment in the Boer War was partly based on Australian ideology as a British colony, but in fact Australia had little direct interest in the outcome of the war.