Truth by logic.

Everything is possible.

Physically.

Example.

You can climb over anything that you can see, which exist.

By sight we are gifted. By God

By light sight gives us conciousness.

How an organism perceives light is different amongst species.

Ones sights might allow it to be better adapted to the world therefore making its conciousness stronger as an individual.

Humans are in between but because of logic thought and anatomical advantages we rule over the animal and plant kingdoms and every element that exist, except only by working together we can withold elements of the outermost parts of the universe which are unknown to man and hold mystical properties.

This is the beauty about life. Only by caring for one another and helping one another achieve goals which challenge the intellect and sharpen the morals of someone can it be enjoyed.

Your statement "everything is possible" also means that it's possible the statement "everything is possible" isn't possible.

In either case, I really appreciate the larger message you're trying to convey here

reply to post by followtheevidence


yes but that is part of our logic thought which is set apart from our anatomy.

What I mean it is not meant to serve as truth.

Truth is what we see, which exist.

Which we can only experience physically.

I doubt there is a logic to truth.

reply to post by TheTruthCqer

So a thought though logic is just a thought, it does not affect the physical.

Possible means that you can calculate the odds of it happening. Probable means you can calculate the odds low enough for it to be worth the time to waste time on.

Originally posted by TheTruthCqer
reply to post by followtheevidence

 

yes but that is part of our logic thought which is set apart from our anatomy.

What I mean it is not meant to serve as truth.

Truth is what we see, which exist.

Which we can only experience physically.

edit on 21-5-2012 by TheTruthCqer because: (no reason given)

We don't perceive everything that exists ... so truth is not constrained by what we see.

We all see through a glass darkly, after all.

reply to post by TheTruthCqer


My measly 5 senses will never be able to comprehend the truth...

reply to post by CynicalDrivel


Simple truth is that there are a number of elements and with those elements different chemical reactions can be achieved.

and things better than creating universes and rearanging them can be achieved

reply to post by IEtherianSoul9


senses are used by the physical to help make impressions on the physical and to recollect visualization from the thoughts for chemical reactions.

example a womans perfume enables your smell which in turn can make your thoughts about her lead to visualize any detail about her which enhance your testosterone.

reply to post by followtheevidence


We act not just perceive. perceiving is how you choose to act on what you see to get a balanced result.

example you see a mountaint.

Out of all ways to climb it you choose to ride a 4 wheeler to the top.

Once at the you feel that climbing it would've been more physically challenging and fun.

reply to post by followtheevidence


truth is what we can see because what we can not see is not existing.

Truth is what logic allows us to act upon the physical.

The members of this site are not supportive of views.

I will no longer use it. Peace

By sight we are gifted. By God By light sight gives us conciousness.

Can't agree with that. What of those that are blind? They have no consciousness?

reply to post by TheTruthCqer


So because we don't see atoms they don't exist?

reply to post by Brad-H


They have no conciousne based on sight but have conciousness from other senses. So in ways gifted.

They can climb over anything they feel.

everything exists
nothing is something
if it wasn't, it wouldn't exist
nothing exists

reply to post by SamTGonzalez

nothing is something

No, i'm afraid that this is wrong.

Nothing is Nothing

Something is Something.

Here... let me break this one down for you further:

No-Thing

Some-Thing

Can you not see how the one is totally not the other?


No-Thing is by definition the absence of Things

Some-thing is by definition the existence of Things


Wait a minute... are you trying to say that A =/= A ?

Are you trying to state that Not-A is A?

Originally posted by SamTGonzalez
everything exists
nothing is something
if it wasn't, it wouldn't exist
nothing exists

Nothing exists by not existing.