It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by truthinfact
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Not buying this. there was a 25 million dollar reward for information leading to his arrest/death. If he died of natural causes you expect some poor bodyguard to have not sold that information?
Money Money Money
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by travisirius
If you are so sure he was killed by Obama, show me the pictures.
better yet show us the pics of Osama being dug up. you are the OP wouldnt the burden of proof be on you, or do we quote bad sources and say "How dare you argue with me"
CIA agent is admitting that US forces dug up the body of a dead bin laden only to stage a fake death. It all makes perfect sense because shooting a dead body would not show blood and the decay of the years old dead body. They showed pics of Saddam and Gadhaffi but not bin laden. Reason: He was dead for years and any gunshot wounds on the body would expose the farce that the body had been dead for years.
Originally posted by NormalBates
Then why did they even bother to dig up the body?
Originally posted by faryjay
This picture always makes me smile, coz Obama (The President) seems to be a nobody sat on a small chair in a corner whereas Hillary and crew seem more in power! He just seems like a janitor there who by chance walked in and just sat down quietly!
Originally posted by truthinfact
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Not buying this. there was a 25 million dollar reward for information leading to his arrest/death. If he died of natural causes you expect some poor bodyguard to have not sold that information?
Money Money Money
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by rebellender
better yet show us the pics of Osama being dug up. you are the OP wouldnt the burden of proof be on you, or do we quote bad sources and say "How dare you argue with me"
Burden of proof is on government to prove that they killed Osama, i am just saying that they didnt because they did not provide evidence and giving a very plausible explanation why they did not. In order to prove me wrong they have to provide the evidence. I am not saying that what this guy is saying is Proof but a very likely explanation as I have not seen any convincing evidence that OBL was killed by ST6. Therefore it is more likely that this story is true than the official story. There is no proof on either side.edit on 103131p://5America/ChicagoSun, 20 May 2012 10:27:30 -0500 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AlchemicalMonocular
The death of Osama Bin Laden is being picked apart with a vengeance, lessee now, how many times has this guy died anyway? There were reports of a death in 2001 shortly after 9/11, there were reports of his death in 2003, and now this death, in which he was killed in a “firefight.” He has died by kidney failure, complications due to kidney failure, being blasted apart by bunker buster bombs, shot while hiding (or was that not hiding) behind a woman being used (or not used) as a shield in a firefight.
Uhm….I’m noticing an odd pattern here, for it reminds me of the many Egyptian feats of death of SS General Hans Kammler, who died in (1) a blaze of glory fighting rebelling Czechs in Prague; (2) by a gunshot to the head in a suicide; (3) by ordering his SS orderly to shoot him in the head; (4) by taking poison in a wood outside Prague, or (5) not dying at all (if we are to believe Wernher von Braun), but disguised himself as a Catholic monk and snuck out of Europe (can we say “Argentina”?)
It reminds me of the many feats of death of Martin Bormann, who died in a tank, or …maybe it was beside a tank, oh wait a minute, he died near the Weidendammer Bridge, or was that the Lehter railroad station?
Or consider Adolf himself, who, according to the official version (neatly tied by the media to the announcement of Osama’s death), killed himself with a pistol shot to the right temple in the bunker on April 30, 1945, or was that with a pistol shot up through the mouth? or a pistol shot to the temple while simultaneously biting down on a cyanide capsule? Oh well, it doesn’t matter, because his body was destroyed. Just like Osama’s, just like Bormann’s (which surfaced in 1972), just like Kammler’s….oh wait, they didn’t find any body for Kammler.
So what do we have?
(1) No bodies by destruction of evidence (Hitler and Bin Laden)
(2) No bodies by the absence of a body (Kammler)
(3) Obfuscated stories whose conflicting details can never be resolved (Osama, Hitler, Bormann, and Kammler); and,
(4) Those with the most to gain are the very ones telling the stories(the Nazis, the government, &c).
And while we’re at it, don’t forget that these types of sacrifices are always performed according to ritual, and to effect a state of consciousness in the people, to socially engineer the medium.
It sort of leaves one breathless, doesn’t it?