It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
it will only get worse
RIP
there will be at least one cult that does a mass suicide in december
sad
Originally posted by Trolloks
The world just got a little lighter.....
I have no sympathy for this girl. She seemed to not use any critical thinking, you can't just believe everything you read about these things, you should take everything with a pinch of salt. If you thought the world was going to end, and was so certain that you would hang yourself, then why would you kill yourself anyway? Why not just die when the world ends? At least then there is a chance that you would survive because it's not true (personaly, im not a 2012 believer).
No doubt people will jump on the bandwagon and blame people here and blame people there, but the fact is that there if no one to blame, it is her fault, no one elses. I may sound like a horrid person, or someone lacking in compasion, but in all seriousness, she did it, and it was no one elses fault.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by SaturnFX
As a skeptic, I am not doing a good enough job debunking the EOTW stuff that pops up.
That's not a skeptic.
A skeptic doesn't know the end result and seeks answers.
You sound like you already have your mind made up, that the world isn't going to end any time soon, and that any claim that it will is automatically 'debunked'.
This means that you are actually a faith based believer, you have faith they are wrong, and you believe that you know what you are talking about.
This is very different than the generalized skeptic who admits they do not know the future and instead applies logic and questions things until the facts become more apparent.edit on 18-5-2012 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)
reply to post by SaturnFX
Ultimately, until there is strong evidence, preferrably peer reviewed, showing something destructive...then it should be treated as an academic hypothesis moreso than something to prepare for..no?
Originally posted by EvanB
reply to post by SaturnFX
Ultimately, until there is strong evidence, preferrably peer reviewed, showing something destructive...then it should be treated as an academic hypothesis moreso than something to prepare for..no?
Thing is SFX, they keep the details to themselves
All us plebs have is the internet
Look at all of the lies coming out of Fukushima? Or the so called war on terror.. If it was not for the net I guess a lot of us would be throwing ourselves at the "enemy" gladly...
edit on 18-5-2012 by EvanB because: (no reason given)