It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by Ahabstar
reply to post by kawika
That is the thing, I had to submit my own bio in 1988 and 1989. Presumably, so would Obama. That is if he filled out and returned the bio to them. Otherwise he would be listed with minimal information.
Might have to search out some libraries to find the actual book versus relying on online information. Come to think of it, there may be a lot of unanswered questions to be found.
Why presume when we have actual facts.
We have the author of the bio herself, and we have the publisher of the booklet both saying independently that the individuals did not write their own bios.
It makes no sense to make wild accusations when you have facts staring you in the face and you refuse to use them.
Originally posted by Pervius
Big deal if he WAS born in Kenya.
We are a REPUBLIC, not a Democracy. The American people don't pick their PResident, and never have.
That's perfect example of your bias.
I don't know if she's lying. I cannot get inside her skull.
But here you are, you somehow knew that I thought she was lying? How do you know what I was thinking? Are you psychic? I don't really believe in psychics so much I think it's mostly hocus pocus, especially considering you didn't read my mind correctly.
So I either agree with you or disagree with you? I am not allowed to sit on the fence and allow the facts to speak for themselves?
I never said this was legit, I said the odds of it being a mistake are absurd, and instead a more feasible debunking would be that it was entirely faked. That was just an opinion based on the circumstances rather than a conclusion about validity.
The only fact on your side is that you are 100% opinionated and bias. There is no option that you might be wrong, in fact out of the thousands of ATS posts I have read from you, you NEVER once admitted you were incorrect. It's always "Im right you are all wrong".
I knew it was only a matter of time until someone played the race card lol
so $&@!ing predictable.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Let me bring you up to speed.
Obama is sitting pretty well to be re-elected.
I don't buy into the scary and evil TPTB...so when you say "they" are responsible...it just makes me chuckle.
So much for Obama. He isn't even smart enough to proof a bio for HIS FIRST BOOK?
-Show me where the author admitted it was a mistake.
Miriam Goderich edited the text of the bio; she is now a partner at the Dystel & Goderich agency, which lists Obama as one of its current clients.
"This was nothing more than a fact checking error by me--an agency assistant at the time," Goderich wrote in an emailed statement to Yahoo News. "There was never any information given to us by Obama in any of his correspondence or other communications suggesting in any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii. I hope you can communicate to your readers that this was a simple mistake and nothing more."
-The publishers claimed it was standard practice to have bio's authorized by the individual they were writing them for before publication (as verified by other people here who have had bios published)
Acton, who spoke to Breitbart News by telephone, confirmed precise details of the booklet and said that it cost the agency tens of thousands of dollars to produce.
He indicated that while "almost nobody" wrote his or her own biography, the non-athletes in the booklet, whom "the agents deal[t] with on a daily basis," were "probably" approached to approve the text as presented.
Originally posted by beezzer
Obama didn't even "proof" it?
So much for Obama. He isn't even smart enough to proof a bio for HIS FIRST BOOK?
Obama didn't even "proof" it?
So much for Obama. He isn't even smart enough to proof a bio for HIS FIRST BOOK?
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
You want the Supreme Court to use a bio authored by someone else in a booklet that promotes multiple books as evidence that Obama was born in Kenya????
Are you seriously kidding me???
No, they are not kidding you, that is exactly what birthers want!
Why do you have to "label" people who question something?
Why are they called nasty words intended to belittle and marginalize them?
Why can't you just answer the question sufficiently and avoid the personal attacks?
There is only one answer Birthers will accept...and that is Obama was born in Kenya...they aren't just asking questions...they are trying to confirm their pre-determined conclusion that they have no evidence for.
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by beezzer
Obama didn't even "proof" it?
So much for Obama. He isn't even smart enough to proof a bio for HIS FIRST BOOK?
Hmmmm.
I remember a few people saying Ron Paul needed to come clean,and was ultimately responsible about some racist newsletters.....
How the shoe doesn't fit,when it comes to Obama,hey?
I would actually call those who said that hypocrites........edit on 18-5-2012 by sonnny1 because: (no reason given)
But when you couple this on TOP of everything else, you'd have to be in complete denial bordering on comatose, to not at least raise an eyebrow.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Mods please stop them from getting away with using pejorative labels designed to infuriate and upset people.
Look there is a terminology for people who question the President's origins, and it is only used to attack and ridicule them. It is not used in any legitimate format, but rather as a trolling mechanism to create mud slinging matches and fight over pointlessness.
Or is it ok if we can just name call them back?
Like guy 1: You birthers
guy 2 : You idiots
Is this how ATS should be? Or should we have higher standards and attempt to avoid the petty name calling?
Just an honest question.
Originally posted by Jedimind
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
You seem to downplay how big a mistake it is. That's not just a small mistake to make to say he was not even born in America but in Africa.
Secondly, why was the mistake not fixed sooner than years later?
Just because the person said it was an error that doesn't really settle anything. I need to hear a sufficient explain of why the error was made in the first place.