Obama or Romney – War or More War?

The only people I see wanting and talking about war all the time are you people here. I do not know why you all have this war fetish but, everytime anything happens you all go screaming and running in circles declaring it will be war. Obama does not want a war unless it is something quick with global support like Libya. He left Iraq and is getting out of Afganistan by 2014. He is however very pragmatist and will use force if needed but, he us not going to rush into anything.

reply to post by MrSpad

The only people I see wanting and talking about war all the time are you people here. I do not know why you all have this war fetish but, everytime anything happens you all go screaming and running in circles declaring it will be war.

'You people'??

The first article in the OP is the US ambassador to Israel saying the war plans are complete. If I remember correctly, he was appointed by Obama. 

Obama does not want a war unless it is something quick with global support like Libya. He left Iraq and is getting out of Afganistan by 2014. He is however very pragmatist and will use force if needed but, he us not going to rush into anything.

We'll see.

He sure rushed into Libya without congressional approval. Why did we go there again? Was the US under serious threat from Libya?

reply to post by neo96

Is war coming?

Within the next decade and considering the current state of the union it would be those most stupid move in world history.

They’re marching closer to the false flag main event! Talk about lowering the bar!

This week, Congress is considering two pieces of legislation relating to Iran. The first undermines a diplomatic solution with Iran and lowers the bar for war. The second authorizes a war of choice against Iran and begins military preparations for it. H.Res.568: Eliminating the Most Viable Alternative to War – The House is expected to vote on H.Res. 568. Read the resolution. Section (6) rejects any United States policy that would rely on efforts to contain a nuclear weapons-capable Iran. Section (7) urges the President to reaffirm the unacceptability of an Iran with nuclear-weapons capability and opposition to any policy that would rely on containment as an option in response to Iranian enrichment.

This language represents a significant shift in U.S. policy and would guarantee that talks with Iran, currently scheduled for May 23, would fail.

link