It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
link
U.S. plans for a possible military strike on Iran are ready and the option is "fully available", the U.S. ambassador to Israel said, days before Tehran resumes talks with world powers which suspect it of seeking to develop nuclear arms.
Like Israel, the United States has said it considers military force a last resort to prevent Iran using its uranium enrichment to make a bomb.
link
Despite his record as a “warrior-president,” despite the breathless “Obama got Osama” campaign boosterism, common inside-the-Beltway wisdom has it that the president has backed himself into a national security corner. He must continue to appear strong and uncompromising on defense or else he’ll get the usual Democrat-as-war-wimp label tattooed on his arm by the Republicans.
Similarly, to have a realistic chance of defeating him -- so goes American political thinking -- candidate Romney must be seen as even stronger and more uncompromising, a hawk among hawks. Whatever military spending Obama calls for, however much he caters to neo-conservative agendas, however often he confesses his undying love for and extols the virtues of our troops, Romney will surpass him with promises of even more military spending, an even more muscular and interventionist foreign policy, and an even deeper love of our troops.
Obama does not want to lose the jewish vote, or look like a pansy because of re-election. The only hope Israel has is to take out nuclar Iran before the election.
If mexico started building nuclear bombs to use on America, I am sure no one in the right mind would have a problem to neutralize that nuclear threat..
Why should the jews go through another holocaust because of political pandering?
Romney, Obama, who ever the hell is president can not deny Israel the right to protect itself
from a very dangerous and blood thirsty Iran.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by popsmayhem
Obama does not want to lose the jewish vote, or look like a pansy because of re-election. The only hope Israel has is to take out nuclar Iran before the election.
I’m sure he has purposely dragged this thing out to create chaos prior to November. No doubt he’s pandering…that’s all he does. I think Israel should handle Iran whenever it chooses to. If they need US help I'm sure Obama or Romney would jump right in without authorization. Taking out Iran is part of the agenda regardless who the POTUS is, no?
If mexico started building nuclear bombs to use on America, I am sure no one in the right mind would have a problem to neutralize that nuclear threat..
Why should the jews go through another holocaust because of political pandering?
Romney, Obama, who ever the hell is president can not deny Israel the right to protect itself
from a very dangerous and blood thirsty Iran.
I don’t have a problem with Israel defending itself. I have a problem with US fighting the war for Israel. I also have a problem with Obama (or Romney) using war as a political tool. Israel is quite capable of handling itself against any ME country IMO. Any US involvement would be politically motivated.
I haven’t seen congress declare war on Iran…until then US has no business there.
Sadly, even with this forum's nature, people still think they're not pushing for war with Iran and that favouring another politician over Obama will change the policies etc. Obama is even pretending he doesn't want to go to war with Iran, whether to win votes or what, the talks and peaceful solutions are all just charades until another false flag occurs to blame Iran, or Israel just flat out goes for it and Iran retaliates. It's already been decided if another puppet gets in.
Obama, Romney et al are all puppets. It is in absolute fact, just like in Britain under Labour went to war with Iraq and Afghan, and under the Conservatives Britain bombed Libya, it doesn't matter who is 'in charge', the system is corrupt.
The only politician out there right now exposing this is Ron Paul, what he would do to solve it I don't know, but it would be a start.
One of my fears of Ron Paul is that if he did get into power, he'd leave Europe and the middle east to it, but unfortunately America has started too much and got too deep, so I wouldn't fully agree if he pulled out fully because ironically, that could also massively destabilise the region and world.
Sure under the they want nukes guise(which i really do think) and considering the fact of the last decade in Iraq where Ameircan servicemen were being kiled with Iranian weapons and training well then "war" is justified.
If so then congress need to vote on it. When was the last time the American people had a say in whether or not US goes to war? It’s been a while!!
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by Wonderer2012
Sadly, even with this forum's nature, people still think they're not pushing for war with Iran and that favouring another politician over Obama will change the policies etc. Obama is even pretending he doesn't want to go to war with Iran, whether to win votes or what, the talks and peaceful solutions are all just charades until another false flag occurs to blame Iran, or Israel just flat out goes for it and Iran retaliates. It's already been decided if another puppet gets in.
Obama, Romney et al are all puppets. It is in absolute fact, just like in Britain under Labour went to war with Iraq and Afghan, and under the Conservatives Britain bombed Libya, it doesn't matter who is 'in charge', the system is corrupt.
Well said! It has all been decided…
The only politician out there right now exposing this is Ron Paul, what he would do to solve it I don't know, but it would be a start.
One of my fears of Ron Paul is that if he did get into power, he'd leave Europe and the middle east to it, but unfortunately America has started too much and got too deep, so I wouldn't fully agree if he pulled out fully because ironically, that could also massively destabilise the region and world.
I agree, and we share the same fear. I worry about the vacuum RP would create by pulling so far back and leaving our interests overseas exposed. I think this would embolden our enemies rather than placate them.
It appears we once again have no reasonable choice in this election; extreme one way or extreme the other way.
It would be nice but i do see the rationale behind it getting those schmucks all in one place without playing petty politics does more harm than good.
Then Americans never once have ever gotten all the facts about anything.
link
The framers of the Constitution attempted to balance the power of the President as commander-in-chief with that of Congress, the representatives of the People.
Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution gives to the Executive Branch the command of the nation’s armed forces, while Article I, Section 8 gives to the Legislative Branch the power to decide when the United States goes to war.
Romney talks of America being such a good country, he said he would never apologise for America, yet a large portion of the world suffers because of America and her allies with the current system. A lot of people can't accept this, and that is why truthful threds like this rarely get the attention they deserve, because people struggle to accept the reality- or chose to be ignorant of it.
I'm a little skeptical of the claims of a war with Iran before the election, only because they have been rattling that sabre for a long time now, to no avail.
Although it certainly seems possible, I think there are likely various factions within the US government and Military, some wanting said war, others not.
In some ways, I think a war with Iran would likely benefit Romney more than Obama, because it would rally much of the GOP base who currently dont seem to want to vote for Romney.
And it's hard to say how it play with the Dems. I could see it turning off a LOT of Obama's base if he became even more explicitly pro-war. Then again, many of other parts of his base defended him over his actions in Libya.
Originally posted by seabag
I can see a scenario where Obama joins Israel in a joint strike to take out Iran’s nuclear sites and have a nice clean victory just before the election. That would benefit Obama. He’d portray himself as the man who took out OBL and Ahmadinejad and ended the war in Iraq.