It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by greenfox83
I live 20 minutes from there, and I can know why they did it. It is an Air Force Base, not an active one, but many of our politicians come in through there. Since it is a private base, it's not open to the public. Joe Biden I can understand if they take her camera and delete the pictures, I can accept that. But, not arrest or harm the woman.
Comment 2: “She should know better, taking pictures of an airport.” “I heard it wasn’t an airport, that it was a military base.” “I heard there were signs warning her not to take pictures”.
Gabreski Airport is a general aviation airport owned by Suffolk County and open to the public. It is utilized by private aviation, corporate flights, and air taxi services. It is also home to the 106th Rescue Wing of the Air National Guard. Nancy Genovese was detained and arrested outside the main entrance to the public airport, on Old Riverhead Road, on public property, directly in front of a helicopter shell placed at the airport entrance for the sole purpose of attracting tourists (green arrow pointing to the helicopter display above). There are no signs warning the public from taking pictures, and in fact, why would you set up a helicopter shell by the roadway to attract visitors if you don’t want pictures taken? Another point that is important to remember is that it is perfectly legal to take pictures of an airport or military base from public property. Posting a “no photos” sign does not diminish your constitutional rights.
Originally posted by DoctorMobius
reply to post by eleven44
I said lets all up and leave, as in the government can't rule over us if we left them sitting alone in there poisoned land.edit on 14-5-2012 by DoctorMobius because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by fourthmeal
So, I heard this exact same story before. And now I know why:
This is the exact same story that was told back in February of '11.
And posts about this story go back to Aug '10.
patriotlegaldefense.com...
Now I have no doubt that it happened, but why is this being brought back up (and made semi-viral) a year++ later?!?!
Guys, I smell something's up. Someone is trying to rile up the people by propping a very old story over and over.
Edit: someone beat me to it with this post
www.newsday.com...
And those are from 2009!
Seriously, y'all.
edit on 14-5-2012 by fourthmeal because: timeline
All discovery has been ordered to be complete by March 16, 2012, All dispositive motions filed by March 30, 2012, and a pre-trial conference is scheduled for April 27, 2012. If discovery stays on track and there are no settlements, a trial should be scheduled for this summer.
Originally posted by DoctorMobius
reply to post by eleven44
....... but with eleven44 and a crack team of ATS armchair warriors on their side the American people fought and defeated the largest most technologically advanced military in known history.
Originally posted by jannerfish
She was not in a suspicious place. She took a photograph of something placed specifically to attract public attention. She was then abused for days on end. It could have been you. Your mother. Anyone. Abused and denied rights for days.
Originally posted by fourthmeal
Now I have no doubt that it happened, but why is this being brought back up (and made semi-viral) a year++ later?!?!