So what's the deal with time travel

Alot of people believe in the theory of time travel, but is it really true?What do you think about Steven Hawkins theories?Do you have any of your own?My theory is the wormhole scenario.

reply to post by swampcricket


my theory is astro space travel through dreams...its very nice and comforting

stephens done ...their all liars

Originally posted by swampcricket
Alot of people believe in the theory of time travel, but is it really true?What do you think about Steven Hawkins theories?Do you have any of your own?My theory is the wormhole scenario.

What are Steven Hawkins theories?

What's the wormhole scenario?

You should expand your post a bit to explain your thoughts.

I think time travel is impossible because it would require too much storage of information. Basically what I'm saying is that everything that has happened in the smallest fraction of time would have to be stored in order for you to travel to whichever moment you want to go to. I can't imagine something that could store all the information that would be required for time travel.

Originally posted by Bleeeeep

Originally posted by swampcricket
Alot of people believe in the theory of time travel, but is it really true?What do you think about Steven Hawkins theories?Do you have any of your own?My theory is the wormhole scenario.

What are Steven Hawkins theories?

What's the wormhole scenario?

You should expand your post a bit to explain your thoughts.

 

I think time travel is impossible because it would require too much storage of information. Basically what I'm saying is that everything that has happened in the smallest fraction of time would have to be stored in order for you to travel to whichever moment you want to go to. I can't imagine something that could store all the information that would be required for time travel.

Moreover who is Steven Hawkins?

I know of a Stephen Hawking, but not this Steven Hawkins guy...

My bad for misspelling, but I know my thoughts, but I want to know other peoples thoughts. When I see what other people think then I can expand on mine because I might learn more from a different perspective.

Terence McKenna once said that if time travel were possible, we would not be able to go back in time, only forward, because time machines did not exist in the past.

My personal thoughts on time travel are that it is completely plausible.

As for how, I have not figured that out yet and will leave it up to people more educated in quantum physics & the like. So yes, I guess I subscribe to Dr. Hawking's theory for the time being, at least until a better theory arises.

People do it every day. I just travelled through time writing this post. I don't need no wormhole, but it would make it way more cool.

I "think" science has already concluded that it is possible, it's just a question of how.

Look for a documentary called "Worlds first time machine" which follows a professor in his quest to build a working model, all I remember is it involves lasers.

It also mentions what an above poster said about only being able to travel back to the moment the device is turned on for the first time.

EDIT: Here you go, the documentary itself.....

The World First Time Machine

As I have stated my belief before,..

Time is but a function of movement in space reletive to a central point. For humans it is the sun. For others it may be theirs. Overall it is the center of the universe.

That said, I believe you cannot travel forward in time, but you can let the past catch back up to you by slowing your movement reletive to the 'central' point.

Unless you can change the vibrational frequency of which you reside, in to a higher level. But thats another story for later times.

Originally posted by Xaphan
Terence McKenna once said that if time travel were possible, we would not be able to go back in time, only forward, because time machines did not exist in the past.

Which would be surprising, given that he was a little nuts, and did a lot of that what we will not speak of...

I would have put money on him claiming he was a time traveler actually.


Here we go, yep, still nuts:



I like his idea about the computer with an uploaded brain that perceives time going slower to live longer for the last minutes of life. Interesting idea...

reply to post by boncho

I don't think he was nuts. Eccentric perhaps, but certainly not nuts. He was probably more intelligent than most members of this website could ever hope to be.

Most people will try to discredit him just because he used psychedelics occasionally. The people who discredit somebody based on their personal habits and choices are usually closed minded.

He was certainly no David Wilcock or David Icke. Not a charlatan by any means.

reply to post by Xaphan


I never said he wasn't sincere. But he was nuts.

Sometimes being nuts isn't entirely a bad thing. His system of thought did not meld with reality, but he found his own reality so-to-speak, and I don't think many would knock him for that...

I have been working on a personal time travel machine. I'm going to try and go back and answer your question before you ask it, and in turn you will not post this inquiry so I won't be going back to answer the question so you will have to ask the question after all to get me to go back and answer before you ask, etc, etc.... My sincere belief is that time travel must surely exist, but interaction simply creates the reality we already knew or will know and essentially nothing changes. It may well be that time travel is developed to return to historic events as an insurance policy that they actually occur as recorded in history.

I realize this leaves out the human nature to ask "what if I tried to change the results instead of nurture them", but I would dare to hope that appropraite screening will be invoked regarding the travelers and we will only have quality, dedicated individuals involved. A leap of faith, but I can dream can't I?

If a time machine was built and one person stepped in it and went back just 5 minutes who would be there when they arrived? We (the rest of us) would still be here so there would be no one there 5 minutes ago except the person who entered the time machine. The person stepping into the machine steps into the machine now and when they arrived at the destination (5 minutes ago) and stepped out it would still be now for them. Also if you went back in time you would land in the middle of space because the earth is moving and would have gone. This is if you believe in the material world.

reply to post by swampcricket


Time travel will be possible if we perceive time as a dimension.

Some already call time the 4th dimension,so if we learn to move,the same way we move into the 3D world,then we will be able to travel back and forth in time.The same way our 3D world has laws,i suppose there are laws in the 4th dimension,that we yet(at least officially) can't comprehend.

What i'm trying to say is that the same way you jump up and down,because you know how much power you need to put in your legs so you defeat the gravity at least for a moment,you are propably able to jump back and forth in time if you knew the power that is needed to defeat the law that keeps us from doing the jumps and makes us move only forward in time.

reply to post by Phantom traveller


You will never move outside of now no matter how hard you try. See you never move. The enviroment moves but you will never move. Notice when you walk down a street that you are not moving, it is the street that moves.

reply to post by Itisnowagain

What the hell are you talking about? Of course we move. We have legs. If the world around you was moving then you would wake up somewhere different to where you went to sleep.

Our perception of what time does is based on our observations from our senses. That does not mean the structure of what time truely is composed of is dependent on our having senses. That is the viewpoint from pure ego.

Time is absolute kinetic Presence that exists as all the future and all the past. Space is composed of the "material" of time that has been forceably stopped. Pure space exists for an infinitesimal duration because it is the completion of the conversion from absolute kinetic into absolute static. Just that infinite space exists as a string of instances, probably at Planck rate of frequency.

Time as all the future radiates from infinite expanse (from everywhere, towards everywhere, implosive) towards the ONE infinitely kinetic (every angle), infinitesimal singularity. Where this Singularity IS during It's flight, as a component of the overall flight path, is the Presence that is the infinite expanse. Where this same Singularity IS NOT during it's flight, as a component of the overall flight path, is Nothing or null that is the infinite impedence.

When the imploding current of time impacts this Nothing or null, it is the infinite impedence causing the current of time to convert into the voltage that is space. This perfection completion of this conversion is "the present". This happens over and over at Planck rate of frequency. It's just that our senses observe the "blur" where both space and time co-exist while it is in the process of conversion away from infinite expanse space, back toward it's default state of absolute kinetic as time to be all the past. Talk about violence!

Our senses cannot detect pure time because our senses require both space and time to co-exist. This is why we cannot "see" the future nor the past. Our senses cannot detect pure space because as a characteristic of pure space, there is no time. Pure space exists as a string of infinitesimal duration instances.

Space is "voltage" whereas time is "current". The infinite impedence, the load, is the cause for spacetime transition to exist. Spacetime transition is called the Universe. Then there is a whole pile of parasitic bleed-off harmonics that are particles and energy. It's all because the Singularity exists, then is placed into infinite angular kinetics. Why though? How though? I believe I know and it's very disturbing. I can't "look" at it. I try to hide from it.

reply to post by Xaphan


Get up right now and walk across the room. If you examine what is really happening you will find that you are always in the centre of your experience. The room moves, enviroments move but you aren't moving in your experience. I know it is not what you have been taught so what i say sounds false but if you examine you experience your will find that you don't move ever, it is the world that moves.

If you don't believe me then check out this short video where Peter Brown goes into depth about this subject with someone who is convinced that they move, it is very interesting to find that you have been seeing the world wrong. It's a real mind blower, is your mind ready though?

youtu.be...
Start at 3.00 if you want to skip to the bit i refer to.