The Left’s National Vote Fraud Strategy Exposed

The Left’s National Vote Fraud Strategy Exposed
Accuracy in Media
James Simpson — May 8, 2012


This article (in the author's opinion) outlines a four point strategy for voter fraud apparently used by well funded Liberal Left Wing organizations.

He points to the dreaded (in some people's views) Cloward Piven Strategy and Acorn and how they achieve "vote getting".

Very controversial article.

It exposes many Possible "corruption" methods and includes some videos as well as confirming links.

This report reveals the Left’s vote fraud strategy for the 2012 elections. Like a KGB operation, it is thorough, multi-faceted and redundant. It has overt and covert, illegal and legal elements, the latter of which are designed, at least in part, to facilitate illegal activities later. It is a deliberate, premeditated, comprehensive plan to win the 2012 presidential election at all costs, and is in keeping with the organizational methods, associations and ethics of the Community-Organizer-in-Chief, Barack Obama.

The Left seeks fundamental structural change to our entire form of government. In keeping with their amoral, means-justifies-ends philosophy, they will register any voters, dead or alive, legal or illegal, who will then vote as many times as possible, in order to establish a “permanent progressive majority.” As two New York Democrats recently caught in a vote fraud scandal told police, “voter fraud is an accepted way of winning elections…”

Politicians of both parties are not above engaging in vote fraud. But this kind of corruption is relegated to individual campaigns or areas where corrupt political establishments have been able to develop unchallenged. It is not a systematic component of overall national strategy, as it is with the Left.

This strategy has been under development for decades. They have constructed an entire industry devoted to this task and pursue a multifaceted strategy to accomplish it:

The "Plan"

1. Swamp election officials with overwhelming numbers of registrations at the last possible minute, a huge proportion of which are deliberately fraudulent, in order to create systematic chaos. This accomplishes numerous goals:

* Makes verification of registrations difficult, given the small size and limited budgets of state and local election offices.

* Provides multiple opportunities for vote fraud.

* Throws the entire voting process into question, providing pretext for lawsuits where concessions may be obtained from election officials.

* When election officials challenge registrations, they are accused of “voter suppression.” This in turn serves complementary goals:
- Charge of “voter suppression” reinforces the Left’s narrative about America as an oppressive, “racist” country.
- Publicity and lawsuits intimidate election officials, who settle on terms favorable to the Left.

2. Activists sue state authorities for “voter suppression,” creating further chaos and pressuring them to become de facto taxpayer-funded voter registration operations;

3. Eric Holder’s Justice Department tacitly supports voter intimidation tactics, sues states and backs private lawsuits, and resists reform as “voter suppression.”

4. Leftist echo chamber discredits allegations of vote fraud, supports “suppression” theme, and promotes advantageous legislation.

The ACORN Swamping Method

Key to understanding the Left’s vote-fraud strategy is the community organizing group ACORN. ACORN has become synonymous with corruption, complicity in the subprime mortgage crisis and especially vote fraud.

The Cloward Piven Strategy

ACORN is the face of vote fraud, but its intellectual foundation is the Cloward Piven Strategy. Sociology professors Richard Cloward (Columbia University) and Frances Fox Piven (CUNY) were founding members of Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). Cloward died in 2001 but Piven lives on.

The Issue is Never the Issue

The Left’s solution to everything is socialism, although they are usually careful not to name it, instead identifying issues that seemingly only their policies can redress. But “the issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution” as David Horowitz has explained. The “issues” are mere distractions.

National Voter Registration Act

Throughout the 1980s, Human SERVE field-tested legal and political strategies to promote this plan. The fruits of its labor were finally realized with “Motor Voter,” the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), signed into law with Cloward and Piven standing directly behind President Clinton.

Section 7 Lawsuits

While capitalizing on the vote fraud swamping strategy enabled by the NVRA, ACORN, Project Vote and others sue states that don’t aggressively execute the voter registration activities required by Section 7 of the law. The narrative is always “voter suppression,” and settlements have forced state agencies to become de facto low income voter registration drives.

DOJ and ACORN Team Up for 2012

Judicial Watch obtained several documents showing coordination between DOJ, Project Vote and the White House. In one email, Project Vote demanded action on NVRA cases. Less than a month later, DOJ sued Rhode Island for NVRA noncompliance. Similarly, DOJ’s Louisiana NVRA suit followed Project Vote’s by a few months. Project Vote is promoting prospective employees for DOJ’s Voting Rights section.

Very Very long article..... they cite many public cases....

Read for details ... many links confirm some of this

The Left’s National Vote Fraud Strategy Exposed


(Youtube Caption

Accuracy in Media's Center for Investigative Journalism released a report detailing the strategies, ongoing efforts and results of systematic vote fraud and intimidation in American elections. From Cloward Piven and ACORN to the host of Soros-funded foundations bent on "fundamental transformation," AIM sheds light on electoral rigging - unlike the mainstream press.

(Youtube Caption

Accuracy in Media's Center for Investigative Journalism released a report detailing the strategies, ongoing efforts and results of systematic vote fraud and intimidation in American elections. From Cloward Piven and ACORN to the host of Soros-funded foundations bent on "fundamental transformation," AIM sheds light on electoral rigging - unlike the mainstream press.

Intimidation and Improper Removal of Alt Judge ?

What better plan can there be than the right running Romney for president?

Peace

Looks like you put it in some hard work here...I Know some of the things you state are likely true..what is a US election without fraud?

But I sincerely believe that Obama will need no help defeating Romney. If our votes count at all...he is as scary as Obama..and less predictable.

Click here for more information.

...Meanwhile the GOP has been methodically passing suppression bills in at least 20 states.

Can anyone show me some examples of voter fraud???

Come on OP post all those cases up for us to "see"

reply to post by pirhanna


Now that is downright delusional..

Really? go back to bush in 2000? You are trying to make it a right vs left thing by even mentioning Bush in 2000

This is about corruption plain and simple and it shouldn't matter to anyone whether you are a righty or a lefty..

When someone gives a pass at a corrupt politician just because he or she is "in" their party, they are admitting that they are part of the problem and are actively helping bring down the country..

WikiLeaks Released Email Shows Obama 2008 Voter Fraud, Russian Money

As part of the WikiLeaks Stratfor Email dump, over the weekend an email has come to light sent in 2008 by a McCain insider on the day Obama gave his victory speech—November 7, in which the insider makes some startling allegations and says he has proof that the Obama campaign and/or supporters had: 1. Stuffed the ballot boxes in Pennsylvania and Ohio. 2. Had given Jesse Jackson ‘hush’ money to keep his Anti-Semitic diatribes to himself 3. Had received campaign contributions from an individual or group within Russia.

www.westernjournalism.com...

Four NY Democrats Plead Guilty to Voter Fraud

Four New York Democrats pleaded guilty to voter fraud after they were caught forging signatures on absentee ballots in a 2009 primary election. CBS06 reported

www.thegatewaypundit.com...

4 Indiana Dems charged with election fraud in 2008

"Felony charges related to election fraud have touched the 2008 race for the highest office in the land.

rosecutors in South Bend, Ind., filed charges Monday against four St. Joseph County Democratic officials and deputies as part of a multiple-felony case involving the alleged forging of Democratic presidential primary petitions in the 2008 election, which put then-candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on the Indiana ballot

obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com...

Al Franken May Have Won His Senate Seat Through Voter Fraud

It looks increasingly likely that at least one member of the United States Senate may owe his seat in the world’s greatest deliberative body not to his charisma or the persuasiveness of his message but to voter fraud.

www.usnews.com...

Yes the Democrats are such "Angels".

reply to post by neo96


Yes Neo, a handful of individuals acting in bad faith is EXACTLY the same
as rigging the electoral system in entire states

reply to post by braindeadconservatives


A handful?

Seriously?

Dead people vote,felons vote,illegals vote hell i bet Reagan even voted.

Hell Obama was not even put on the ballot legally in Indiana.

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by braindeadconservatives

 

A handful?

Seriously?

Dead people vote,felons vote,illegals vote hell i bet Reagan even voted.

Hell Obama was not even put on the ballot legally in Indiana.

Proof?

Originally posted by braindeadconservatives


...Meanwhile the GOP has been methodically passing suppression bills in at least 20 states.

Can anyone show me some examples of voter fraud???

Come on OP post all those cases up for us to "see"

The main theme is about the Methods
But,

There's a couple examples in the article.

The Left’s National Vote Fraud Strategy Exposed

Read the "A Textbook Case: Houston Votes" part.
(to long to quote)

In July 2010, a newly-formed voter registration group named Houston Votes (HV) announced it intended to register 100,000 Houston, Texas area voters in a few months. Catherine Engelbrecht, Leader of True the Vote (TTV) and King Street Patriots (KSP), was skeptical. Her group checked about 1,000 HV registrations. The number of erroneous registrations submitted by HV and Democracia—a group targeting unregistered Hispanics—was, she said, “off the charts.”

and,

They brought their results to Harris County Registrar, Leo Vasquez, who reviewed HV registrations. He found that of 25,640 submitted, only 7,193 were “apparently new voters.” On August 24, Vasquez held an unprecedented press conference, announcing:

Evidence shows that the Houston Votes and Texans Together organization is conspiring in a pattern of falsification of government documents, suborning of perjury and a deliberate effort to over-burden our processing system with thousands of duplicate and incomplete voter registration applications.

He raised concerns that HV was, like ACORN, paying employees based on the number of applications they turned in, and cited specific examples of problematic registrations:

3,531 No match for SSN or driver’s license number

1,597 Multiple apps for the same person

1,014 Pre-existing voters

1,030 Incomplete apps

25 Non-citizens

325 Minors

129 Ineligible felons

1,133 No ID

1,323 Filed past deadline

Three days later, a massive warehouse fire destroyed Harris County’s 10,000 voting machines. The fire’s timing bred suspicions, fed almost exclusively by the Left, which sought through innuendo to implicate KSP. A Huffington Post headline two days later was typical: “Possible Arson and the Right’s Texas Voter Suppression Effort.” This theme was repeated ad nauseam in the liberal media echo chamber. The Houston Fire Department later cited “an unspecified electrical short” as the cause, an explanation that satisfied no one.[iv]

Originally posted by braindeadconservatives

...Meanwhile the GOP has been methodically passing suppression bills in at least 20 states.

Some of those examples may be worthy of discussion .....

Please bring up one or two with some justification to your way of thinking.

I don't know which ones you are talking about.



Anyone interested: google search "democrat voter fraud"

Fraud runs deep in either party but to be honest here what difference will it really make in our elections if they are all electronically tabulated through proprietary vote-flipping software owned by a company in Spain?

And if that doesn't give them the result they want they call in the corrupt Supreme Court.

Vote fraud is real but this is like picking fleas off the elephant that is trashing your place.

this example is relevant:

Tallahassee | An estimated 180,000 non-U.S. residents are registered to vote in Florida, according to state records. It’s a tightly held secret not shared with county election officials or the state’s election chief even after he took the job.

The large number of non-residents potentially on state voter rolls was first identified in early 2011 when the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles turned over residency information to the Department of State.

Using a 1.4 million voter sample, the state estimated at the time that there were “almost 900,000 voters who may or may not be U.S. citizens” in Florida, according to documents obtained by the Times-Union. Verification of citizenship has whittled that number to the current 180,000.

180,000 non-residents could be registered to vote in Florida

reply to post by Asktheanimals


The voter fraud issue is only the tip of the iceberg, and what difference would it make if there were no voter fraud but the vast majority voting honestly believe they live in a democracy where majority rules and if the majority wants to vote away rights this is just the price people have to pay for "freedom"?

What difference does it make when people think that a "one man one vote" scenario is the lynchpin of freedom while turning around and making arguments as to why rights have to be reigned in and regulated because as many will claim: "one mans rights can trample over another mans rights"?

What difference does it make when people think that every act of legislation that comes down the pike is actually law, and that anyone who suggests that rights are natural and preexist government are merely being "philosophical" and have no understanding of the how the "real world works"?

What difference does it make when most couldn't even tell you what the Ninth Amendment states, and too many of those who can will argue that this Amendment is "too vague" to be understood?

What difference does it make, in spite of that Ninth Amendment, and in spite of express language that clearly identifies the Bill of Rights as prohibitions on government, that too many of these voters insist that the Constitution grants them their rights?

What difference does it make when the sacred cow of "civil rights" trumps the "philosophical" unalienable rights that founded this nation?

Nice job on the thread, O.P. Star and Flag!