It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XXX777
The ''homeless'' guy is clearly playing with the officer and not one bit complying. He is behaving like he is drunk. He is using up so much of his energy hollering and resisting some more. Why not just comply and be quiet?
Originally posted by XXX777
Why did the guy not simply comply with the Police officer's orders?
The fact in this case is that the dead guy battled the Police and lost. He got what he wanted.
Originally posted by MrInquisitive
reply to post by OGOldGreg
Thanks to the original poster for creating this thread; I had not heard of this case until I saw it, so ATS is good for something sometimes...
That said, I, too, was sickened, horrified, saddened and angered by viewing the video. The goons on this thread who defended the pigs and said the victim got was he deserved, maddened me more; don't know what else to say about them that won't infringe upon ATS T&C's, so I'll leave that there.
As for the murderous, sadistic cops, I can only hope that they don't go to a cushy minimum security prison, but rather go to one with a lot of hard-case cons who will get wind of these ex-cop's crime, and that finally justice will be meted out to them there.
As to the goof balls who claim violence is never right, even in response to unjust violence, well then, I guess the American Revolution was wrong, and the British were wrong in dumping Neville Chamberlin and making Winston Churchill their PM in order to choose a leader who would use violence to fight the violence and aggression of Nazi Germany. Guess Nat Turner and John Brown were wrong too, taking up arms to fight slavery. Give me a break. If you don't believe violence is never right, then don't pay taxes because they go to governments that use violence all the time to enforce their wills.
Being wrong usually puts you in a losing battle (when it's a battle of wits).
Originally posted by PrimePorkchop
Originally posted by XXX777
Why did the guy not simply comply with the Police officer's orders?
The fact in this case is that the dead guy battled the Police and lost. He got what he wanted.
I concur. But we're in a sea of people who believe that police are inherently evil, and that everyone owes them something for nothing...so don't expect much support for ideas like this on ATS.
It's a losing battle.edit on 10-5-2012 by PrimePorkchop because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PrimePorkchop
I concur. But we're in a sea of people who believe that police are inherently evil, and that everyone owes them something for nothing...so don't expect much support for ideas like this on ATS.
Originally posted by XXX777
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by XXX777
Why did the guy not simply comply with the Police officer's orders?
The fact in this case is that the dead guy battled the Police and lost. He got what he wanted.
Are you kidding me right now?
Are YOU kidding ME? Can I not have an opinion? I see this clearly for what it is.
If a Police officer asked me to put my feet in front of me, I would do it.
If he asked me to put my hands up, I would do it.
I would NOT play games with him, put my hands up and then put them down again, stretch my legs out and then draw them back again.
I would obey the commands and arrive at some sort of peaceful conclusion.
The ''homeless'' guy is clearly playing with the officer and not one bit complying. He is behaving like he is drunk. He is using up so much of his energy hollering and resisting some more. Why not just comply and be quiet?
I've had a Police officer point a shotgun directly at me, and believe me I complied extremely quickly. If a person is incapable of correct social response, then perhaps that person is better eliminated.
Originally posted by reg
I've had a Police officer point a shotgun directly at me, and believe me I complied extremely quickly. If a person is incapable of correct social response, then perhaps that person is better eliminated.
WOW i can't believe you actually think that, so someone deserves to die a brutal death for been mentally ill? right gotcha you'd av fit right in with the nazis pal.
Originally posted by XXX777
Originally posted by paradox
Originally posted by XXX777
Why did the guy not simply comply with the Police officer's orders?
The fact in this case is that the dead guy battled the Police and lost. He got what he wanted.
Are you kidding me right now?
Are YOU kidding ME? Can I not have an opinion? I see this clearly for what it is.
If a Police officer asked me to put my feet in front of me, I would do it.
If he asked me to put my hands up, I would do it.
I would NOT play games with him, put my hands up and then put them down again, stretch my legs out and then draw them back again.
I would obey the commands and arrive at some sort of peaceful conclusion.
The ''homeless'' guy is clearly playing with the officer and not one bit complying. He is behaving like he is drunk. He is using up so much of his energy hollering and resisting some more. Why not just comply and be quiet?
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
Your Rights as a U.S. Citizen Against Unlawful Arrest ..........
“Citizens may resist Unlawful arrest to the point of taking an officer’s life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S., 529. The court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense was commited.”
“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. If the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh V. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.
“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. 1; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260.
“Each Person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, ther person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self defense.” State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100.
“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910.
“The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace.”
Wharton’s Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol. 2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197.
I am sure some Police Officers in this Country are Unaware about these Court Decisions when Overstepping their Authority . People who know the Law should Remind them about it from Time to Time for the sake of their Own Safety . The Woman in this Video was Intimidated by that Police Officer because she was just Not Aware of her Rights and Cow Downed to his Intimidation of her Ignorance . She should take this matter to a Lawyer Immediately and press charges against him IMO .