It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Science is always discovering odd scraps of magical wisdom and making a tremendous fuss about its cleverness. Aleister Crowley;
link; www.brainyquote.com...edit on 15/07/2010 by K-PAX-PROT because: (no reason given)edit on 15/07/2010 by K-PAX-PROT because: (no reason given)edit on 15/07/2010 by K-PAX-PROT because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by juleol
Originally posted by NotReallyASecret
The scientists are almost right.
But the problem is that these are astral encounters with nonphysical astral beings.
So instead of lucid dream, I would say OBE/astral projection.
And I would disagree. I think they are nothing more than a lucid dream. I have had plenty of WILD induced lucid dreams that are exactly like how people describe their OBE experiences. I have the vibrations, sounds that most claim to have, which is nothing more than a side effect from sleep paralysis.
The techniques to induce so called oobes are even nearly identical to WILD technique which is known to often induce sleep paralysis. A person floating out of his/her body is nothing more than a shift to the dreambody once your physical body has been paralyzed.
Originally posted by kerazeesicko
You accept one Harvard professor's work but not two other professors who are also from Harvard who have come to different conclusions? Why?
MACK: These experiences often occur in literal consciousness. Not in a hypnogogic or dreamlike state. The person may be in their bedroom quite wide awake. The beings show up. And there they are and the experience begins. That they're not occurring in any dreamlike state. Now sometimes they do occur when a person is dozing off or in a hypnogogic state. But very frequently not. Also, any theory that is going to look upon this as a purely endogenous phenomenon, by which I mean generated purely from the psyche of the person themselves. Which is a kind of arrogance too, really.
Because it means that we just can't accept the notion there could be another intelligence at work here. Which is a much more economical explanation. But if we must find a theory within ourselves, then we should keep in mind that any theory that's going to even begin to address this, has to take into account five factors:
Number one; the extreme consistency of the stories from person after person. Which you would not get simply by stimulating the temporal lobes.
You would get very variable idiosyncratic responses that would differ a great deal from person to person.
Number two, you would have to deal with the fact that there is no ordinary experiential basis for this. In other words, there's nothing in their life experience that could have given rise to this, other than what they say.
In other words, there's no mental condition that could explain it.
Third, you have to account for the physical aspects: the cuts and the other lesions on their bodies, which do not follow any psychodynamic distribution, like the stigmata associated with the identification with the agony of Christ.
Fourth, the tight association with UFOs, which are often observed in the community, by the media, independent of the person having the abduction experience, who may not have seen the UFO at all, but reads or sees on the television the next day that a UFO passed near where they were when they had an abduction experience. And finally,
And finally, the phenomenon occurs in children as young as two, two and a half, three years old. And any theory that simply attributes this to the activity of the brain, does not take into account at least three of those five fundamental dimensions...
Originally posted by K-PAX-PROT
As one who has studied the occult,(hidden),and the writtings of Crowley there is one quote from Crowley that is so fitting of this thread;That physical science has totally missed the reality of other dimensions and intelligences out of the arrogant and some what ignorant mind set of "produce it in a test tube or its non sense" agenda..For anyone who has experienced astral projection etc
Originally posted by kaleshchand
So unless the so called abudctee realized that they were dreaming while they were dreaming about the abduction it can't be a lucid dream. But if they did know then they would not claim or report an abduction.
It can be a dream, no doubt about that and I have seen almost no evidence of any abductions. So yes they could be dreams, but not lucid dreams.
Originally posted by Retro~Burn
Originally posted by K-PAX-PROT
As one who has studied the occult,(hidden),and the writtings of Crowley there is one quote from Crowley that is so fitting of this thread;That physical science has totally missed the reality of other dimensions and intelligences out of the arrogant and some what ignorant mind set of "produce it in a test tube or its non sense" agenda..For anyone who has experienced astral projection etc
Even though through inductive reasoning on which much of scientific theory is based, all that experimentation and observation which has led to an explosion in scientific knowlegde. We're meant to give all of that up and take a person's word for something? Point is most haven't experienced 'astral projection', I don't see how you can expect them to change their minds suddenly because all of a sudden, "science is nonsense". Science isn't the problem, it's one of the few redeeming developments of mankind and again, it's given us a huge base of knowledge. It's some of the scientists who practice science that are the problem. With a 'fringe' subject such as UFOs, there's been very little serious interest in investigating further. Partly because of subersive efforts such as the Robertson Panel and Condon Reports and years of derision by the media. But also because stereotypes perpetuate stories about being anal probed and having space orgies on the moon without any shred of proof. If I recall, the U.S did a study on astral projection or remote viewing and apparently the results were quite underwhelming. If it doesn't hold up to scrutiny then it ought to be challenged surely?
In the same way that if someone claims to have been abducted, one would reasonably ask for some sort of proof or method of corroborating such claims. Further serious study ought to be undertaken. I think such conditions as sleep paralysis are bound to account for a significant number of 'abduction' cases. Of course that doesn't mean all claims are misidentified conditions. And by studying such things, I think it shows a genuine and sincere attempt to discover the truth, rather than try and subvert it in any way.
Originally posted by Retro~Burn
Nice of you to assume. I've actually had two so-called OBEs. One I was too young to remember but I related it to my mum. The second was certainly vivid. But then again it may have just been a vivid dream. Who am I to exclaim I know what it was? The power of the mind is incredible and I don't think it's been fully tapped. Perhaps there is some cognitive process who do not fully understand which isn't paranormal as such. You're the one making the claim, you're the one who has the burden of proof place upon them, not me. If you want us and everyone to believe you. Then you could prove it (if you really wanted to) by conducting a few experiments. What you're describing seems to be a heightened psychological experience of some kind. It's certainly far more plausible than playing Casper.