Luna Cognita: Apollo 11, UFOs Filmed in Cis-Lunar Space - 16mm DAC footage (stabilized/enhanced)

A short 11-frame sequence of 16mm stop-motion DAC footage analyzed by Luna Cognita on an anomalous 16mm DAC motion picture footage during the flight of Apollo 11. Seems one of the astronauts suddenly saw these unidentified objects outside the window of the CSM and quickly grabbed the 16mm DAC camera and started filming....

One other point that I did not specifically bring up in this video but that I feel is worth mentioning here - this particular bit of 16mm film appears to have been a totally impromptu, spur of the moment filming, as if one of the astronauts suddenly saw these unidentified objects outside the window of the CSM and quickly grabbed the 16mm DAC camera and started filming them. There is no other reason whatsoever that this specific 11-second segment of stop-motion footage looking out into the blackness of the cis-lunar void would have been shot otherwise. I think it is clear that these unidentified objects were definitely seen outside the spacecraft by the astronaut shooting this sequence and were deliberately being filmed here.

I do not think this is an accident or just a coincidence that this specific segment of DAC footage showing several UFOs outside the CSM was archived incorrectly, but rather I believe this was done on purpose by NASA in order to help bury this UFO footage so it could effectively be hidden in plain sight within the public archives. Rather than trying to delete or remove this footage from the public archives entirely in order to hide what it shows, NASA instead just archived it in such a way that the raw footage plays back so quickly that the scene would be essentially impossible to interpret without both dramatically changing the playback speed and stabilizing it.

Luna Cognita Strike Again...

Originally posted by Arken
Seems one of the astronauts suddenly saw these unidentified objects outside the window of the CSM and quickly grabbed the 16mm DAC camera and started filming....

...and then got bored after 11 seconds?
Couldnt be bothered trying to focus in on any of them, not even the bright stationary one at the top?

reply to post by Arken
I know Luna usually does his due diligence so I could be wrong here.

The object he focuses on could be part of the high gain antenna with the rest of it effectively lost in the darkness.



Full NASA diagram here.

There's an image of the CSM over here with the antenna in sun light. Another that's slightly more shaded here.

This is a more than decent presentation of a little mystery. He does a great job of explaining all of the relevant aspects of the short video. You are allowed to make up your own mind about what that whole business was about. It is typical for debunkers to seize upon one aspect they can find fault with and ignore any other data that overwhelmingly supports the main premise.

Any time Luna Cognita wants to investigate the old Viking orbiter images of the mysterious grooves on Mars, I would be happy to share the CDs I have. (NASA has not made them easy to find or view either.)

reply to post by Aliensun


I'm still waiting Luna Cognita and Gary on MARS.

Right in Hellas Basin.....
Stars for you.

reply to post by Arken


Saw this earlier from a link I got from Forbidden Knowledge.

Damned curious... but the entire NASA moon program was rife with anomalies that remain either unexplained our downright denied.

The one outstanding feature is that... no one, not the US or Russia or any other nation, has ever made another serious attempt at putting boot prints in the lunar soil again. I mean... here we have this really great platform for mining and science only (varyingly) a quarter million miles distant with but a fraction of our gravity... but, we dodge the opportunity at every chance.

Over time, the evidence amounts to an almost undeniable statement of there being some reason WHY this is so.

reply to post by redoubt


Not yet Allowed...

Because this will mean a real (R)EVOLUTION.

New Energy. New Industry. New Economy. New...(old) Friends. Not only "one", but several and different.

Did I blink and miss it, or did LC once AGAIN cleverly refuse to provide the exact date/time of the video so that a genuinely curious student could compare it to other sources such as the ALSJ and other catalogs, to see what the context was. Disclosing the previous and subsequent scenes would also have provided context.

Just curious....

Hello? Did a BASIC question such as a request for the date/time of origin of the video in question, stop the discussion dead in its tracks?

Is that a clue about the seriousness of the original claim?

reply to post by JimOberg


Hi Jim,

Have you addressed your question to Luna Cognita directly?

Email Address: [email protected]

Let me know if you get a response. Probably more proactive to do that rather than wait for a third party to pass on your concerns.

D.

reply to post by JimOberg


Yuuuh Uuuuh!!

"Down your hat" in front at Gary and Luna Cognita!

researcher...

Countless times the crew of the Apollo missions state that they are being watched over by craft much superior to them...

No antenna here mate... just we got kicked the hell off the moon and told to take our matchbox's back to our planet and sit tight.

but this is all pretty old news so ill end it there.

Thanks OP.

Originally posted by Aarcadius
Countless times the crew of the Apollo missions state that they are being watched over by craft much superior to them...

No antenna here mate... just we got kicked the hell off the moon and told to take our matchbox's back to our planet and sit tight.

but this is all pretty old news so ill end it there.

Thanks OP.

By "countless", I'm presuming that we are in agreement that the precise number is ZERO, right?

Why don't you believe ed mitchell's repeated assertion that he was THERE during Apollo and aliens were NEVER encountered?

As for the question of WHO should provide or obtain fundamental contextual information of video evidence [such as date/time], my only point is that ANYBODY who wants to assess or interpret any video WITHOUT knowing such context, is setting the stage for foolishness and fable and wild goose chasing, down blind allies..

Originally posted by JimOberg
As for the question of WHO should provide or obtain fundamental contextual information of video evidence [such as date/time], my only point is that ANYBODY who wants to assess or interpret any video WITHOUT knowing such context, is setting the stage for foolishness and fable and wild goose chasing, down blind allies..

I agree.

Have you sent him an email?

I have. No reply as yet.

reply to post by JimOberg


No by countless i dont mean "zero" i mean i cannot be bothered counting how many times. and if you really think zero then why one earth are you here? have you not done any research at all?

id post up a link to hello kitty island adventure forum but you might not understand anything there also so...

Here's how i can help... STEP 1: Hit that address bar up top mate, STEP 2: type in www.google.com, STEP 3: when your done typing locate the enter button should be between shift and backslash. Once you've figured all that out you should see a white page with GOOGLE written in the top middle area... if you cannot see this and you might not with so many steps... please go back to step 1 and start over.

once you've followed the steps correctly and you are at a white screen with Google in the top middle and a search bar under it start researching... Probably start small so type in our solar system, you know so you can get a handle on whats going on outside your house. after a while you can get a little bit more detailed and maybe try some NASA stuff. Now you will see alot of bullsht and alot of hoax reports, fake pictures, maybe a bit of nudity... but that's how its done and we all go through it. when you arrive at some info that looks to be legit read it over and put it aside in your head... and don't come on a forum read a persons post then belittle what they say.

Deny Ignorance.

reply to post by Aarcadius


This is kind of awkward.

I suggest you take a look at the link in his signature.

Originally posted by Aarcadius
reply to post by JimOberg

 

Now you will see alot of bullsht and alot of hoax reports, fake pictures, maybe a bit of nudity... but that's how its done and we all go through it.

I think this is the problem. Using the Internet as a research tool is kind of like going to a strip club to find a girlfriend, it's hard to tell what's real. Odd that the same tool for doing research is also the same tool for finding porn.

"How it's done" for assessing any alleged UFO video is to start with its date/time of origin and the witnesses, and developed knowledge of the context of the event.

How it's NOT done is to drool over an ambiguous undated unverifiable video of white dots zipping across the field of view, and imagine they are alien vehicles.

If you're into conning people with videos whose explanation would be obvious if the context were known, "how it's done" is to DENY the target audience access to critical data that could allow the context to be discovered.

How is it being done on this thread?

Originally posted by Aarcadius
have you not done any research at all?

Really had to smile at that.
Asking James Oberg if he'd ever done any research at all.

reply to post by dsm1664


I'm fairly certain he knows. The real problem with Jim is that I and others can't take anything he says with a grain of salt as he's a talking head for NASA. Over many years I have watched him dodge and weave and stick to ONLY the topics he THINKS he can poke holes in on this forum. He RARELY strays from material that he knows he can talk in circles about. He's the furthest thing from a true skeptic. Asking Jim Oberg for an unbiased honest viewpoint or opinion about NASA is akin to filing a complaint with the sergeant of a police officer who just assaulted you unlawfully, it's absolutely pointless.