It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Seriously? You're saying that because a small wooden house requires "rigid members", therefore WTC 7 must have even more of them? I'm assuming that you mean diagonal braces as shown in your picture when you use the term rigid member.
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
A rigid member is an element designed to be rigid and a combination of a rigid members make a rigid frame. Rigid members are very strong ...
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeathThis comment is not comprehensive nor is it meant to be instructive.
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
In your planet, no comment is worth anything unless one is a published and I presume you mean in a peer reviewed journal.
That is is it. No more discourse, no more inquiry by the citizen, no more activism unless you are an expert in the specific field in which one is engaged in a debate as far as you are concerned.
You have shut the door and declared an arbitrary dogma.
By any definition you are a fanatic or are you one of those Pentagon internet propaganda monkeys?
But sure, prove that WTC7 was build with cross braces,
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
So if I go to the trouble of posting drawings of building 7 with rigid frames, will you accept that the NIST model was unacceptable?
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
The NIST computer model does not have rigid frames, it is also missing the skin.
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
I wasn't not addressing you,
Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
I wasn't not addressing you,
This message board has a personal message feature if you want to have private conversations
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
There you go again playing word games. Wasn't I that said that the NIST model had no cross bracing? I want you keep that in mind.
Secondly there are two conventional ways you can pull down a building the way building 7 went down; with cutting charges or if you build it with no rigid frames.
So if I go to the trouble of posting drawings of building 7 with rigid frames, will you agree that the NIST model was unacceptable?
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by MI5edtoDeath
You show a GIF clip of WTC 7 collapsing.....then a still frame of one of the Twin Towers??
WoW!!
Way to be disingenuous........ .......
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
reply to post by Juanxlink
Yeah! I noticed they talk in circles and they never miss an opportunity to exasperate. If they are not Pentagon internet propaganda monkeys, then they are tragic.edit on 12-5-2012 by MI5edtoDeath because: (no reason given)