Michio Kaku: "If you are against world government you are a terrorist"

I have a proposal for all you one world government supporters and their sheeple followers. Let the libertarian, freedom loving individuals alone. Give us Australia or South America as well as half of the nukes and delivery systems so we can protect ourselves from you when you bankrupt yourselves. You can have the rest of the world. Space would be free for all. Under such a scenario, with a free nation of total free market libertarians; I would be willing to bet that we would not only beat the rest of you into space, but our economy would soon eclipse the rest of the world. You socialistic policies would keep you on the verge of bankruptcy forever. Just don't look to us for loans or a bailout.

Originally posted by dusty1
reply to post by Juggernog

 

Thank you for the post.

I think Kaku is a very intelligent man.

However, I think he watches way too much Star Trek.............

Is it really possible to watch to much Star Trek?

Perhaps a world government is not needed, but we do need a totally new level of a complete world collaboration, to be able to evolve as humans.

We need to let every poor nation in on the resources the rich countries have, and work together in a common goal.
This in turn will demand a new level of resource development and resource distribution.
Then again, to be able to handle that, perhaps some kind of central management will be needed, but that does not have to mean that we can not have separate nations.
The important part is that we have leaders whom work in the interest of human rights and welfare, not to fill up there own pockets on the expense of their fellow humans.

The biggest step for humans to take, is the will to share what we have out of compassion and not from government force.

I stopped listening to Kaku, when he recently announced on Coast to coast one night that the radiation from Japan was not going to really do anything to the ocean or the west coast. I used to enjoy listening to him but I've concluded that he's a paid shill. His words about this can't stand up against scientists at Berkeley and Stanford out in CA who have tested rain water and other matter and have found high amounts of radiation.

reply to post by Juggernog


I for one believe in a united one world government. A government not run by religion but by science.
I think this would be the only way we could elevate to a new greater existence. Sadly I also think the only we will realize this is by defeating the nations of this planet that is run
Solely on religion. Fix the middle east and we will be on our way to scientific greatness and space exploration.
Kinda like star trek.

The world is more connected now than ever and such inter-connectedness can only grow in importance in the future. Such an environment lends itself to greater global control and protection of the world's populace and resources. The problem with world government is the loss of not only individual representation in same but also the loss of national sovereignty. Those who would take away individual rights and national sovereignty under the threat of force are the real terrorists.

reply to post by Flyzoid

Sadly I also think the only we will realize this is by defeating the nations of this planet that is run

Yea, if it were only that simple. Sure you can beat down the nation ran by religion and even dismantle its government but you can never win against an idea.
Well, maybe you could but to do so would take many years, cost millions if not billions of lives and set you back several hundred years in human rights, which would be counter-productive to what we are trying to achieve.

Well we do need to get our act together and put every human to good use and unite but as we all know,the ones who are currently trying to bring about a ''world goverment'' don't have our best interests a heart.What we need is a group of people who DO have our best interests at heart and THEN try and implement a one world government with representatives from every walk of life.

This is another confirmation to me that Intellect does not equal wisdom.
.

TPTB are aware that a few sacrifices may be necessary allong the path towards a one world order, or type 1 civilization. They are probably aware as well that the human condition will never let us get to a type one civilization without having a common enemy to help us unite. We are fighters by nature and no common goal will ever get us to this point. We need a common enemy. Look forward to TPTB providing us with this "enemy" if a real one does not surface soon. Let's also pray that the conspiracy theorists or "terrorists" do not pick up on this process too soon in the game and blow TPTB's cover before we reach type 1.

reply to post by Quauhtli


Wait... Just had an epiphany. What if all this genetic engineering, and secret technology was part of a secret plan to grow some sort of alien race that is planning to destroy the human species so that they can turn them loose on us in order to get us all united... Surely Monsanto could create some plant based alien life form with malicious intentions. Then if the plan doesn't work they could spray the solar system down with Roundup. Win/ Win.

Originally posted by Juggernog
Hes talking about mankinds transition from a type 0 civilization to a type one civilization. The comment referenced in the title begins at about 3:20, where he states that those that are against this movement are the terrorists...

edit on 2-5-2012 by Juggernog because: Changed the time from 3:30 to 3:20... typo

An other intresting comment he makes is when he says...

"when we physists look for alien life, we don't look for little green men. We look for type 1, type 2 and type 3 civilizations"

As if there are physists looking for advanced ETs on a regular basis and for quite some time...

If the US government or a "world government" wants a science advisor on advanced alien lifeforms I bet Kaku will be on top of their list. So, in my opinion it worth paying close attention to what Kaku has to say on these matters....Allthough he has probably sworn to secrecy he can always have a slip of the tongue...or say things with a smile while meaning he is telling the truth.

MK should be president of the planet! He is smart and caring! This is what Earth needs!

Those plastic people running for president just are rediculous! Really they just all leave me asking myself...
How much damage and deceit are you going to inflict on our society out of your own personal adgenda?
Only a few Presidents were truely heartful and magestic. This guy has the personality to get us all on the right
road to sucess and green cleaner living. Lets put his name on the Presidental ballot...

If you do not believe in one world government/unification, you are lying to yourself. All big corporations work as if there were no borders, and exploit the boundaries only to pay less tax, to keep people in slavery, poverty and obedience. Rich people do not know any limits as to where they want to live, travel, keep their money etc. "Divide and conquer" comes to my mind when I think about that. In reality the unification is their worst dream - loosing cheap labor for example.
One World Government is not the same thing as One world Community.

reply to post by Juggernog


I completely agree - check the first link in my sig (even embedded this very video).

S & F for posting.

I have never had a problem with this...and if you do a little research most people dont!


We have a United States of America, why not a United States of the World?

NWO'ers want a One World Government

Christian's want a One World Government

Catholic's want a One World Government

Mormon's want a One World Government

Jedi and Trekkers/Trekkies want a One World Government

NAZI's want a One World Government

The United Nations want a One World Government

Mass Effect Players want a One World Government

But I don't think Terrorists want a One World Government...

wow that is an old vid... I remember talking about Kaku ridiculous statement years ago on ATS....
Kaku can kiss my type 0 ass.... I'll never let a type 1 civilization ruin my garden!!!!

reply to post by SquirrelNutz


I do completely agree with what hes saying, I just dont agree with some of the language that he used in saying it.
The word "terrorist" is becoming way over used, just like the words, Nazi and racist etc... People used it for so many examples that is going to lose meaning soon, it already has for me but it may take a while for others.

Anyway, I dont think I will see this step to stage 1 in my lifetime, no where near it, I doubt my 18 year old son will either.
Besides, I have no doubts that when the Government advances to that level, we (the commoners) wont know about it for many, many years afterwards

Our planet is simply too young to qualify to relate on a larger scale. The population has not had time to be homogenized to the point where planetary unity is possible. Give us 10,000 years or so. By then many phenoypic differences will be largely eliminated and some groups will have been completely extinct via war/genocide. We're a giant cake batter that hasn't been in the mixer long enough.

I think that it is clear that the present form of action to create a one world system creates it's own "terrorists" in the process. What is occurring is no different than colonization, or warfare itself. It is currently a hostile endeavor against any and all naysayers through the use of threatening legislation that is merely a negative force to affect the desired outcome.

This idea that somehow, the interconnectivity of financial interests that allows the holders of "capital" to manipulate and therefore force entire nations into compliance shows the short sightedness of desperate people well aware that the proper course would leave them in a position of never personally seeing the goal and so their self seeking motives will never be satisfied. Sending in armies to destroy and other wise "change" errant and non cooperative social groups called nations, is a failed portion of the theory as evidenced by the Iraqi outcome and the easily foreseeable failure coming for Afghanistan.

What evidence is there that the present course of action is more than simple crazy making at the level of pre World Wars treaty issues that led to nations having to take sides at the moment of crisis? How is the present course any different from beating people, groups, and nations into obedience? How is it different from notions of enslavement?

The people driving this machine have lost their vision into their frustration that makes them believe that "it must happen now".

I am actually not against a world governing body. But I am against this method. The only possible successful (proper, I would say) outcome would be for all people desiring to willingly join such an endeavor. This would only occur if a global merge were attractive enough.

Instead of working on the hearts and minds of people everywhere to attempt a softer merge, peacefully attractive and mutually beneficial that can clearly be seen and felt by all people, not propagandised into their minds so that they do not know which way is up or down, and globally some rather stupid bandwagon effect and false group thought takes hold, they have chosen the current course of action.. This only creates enemies of one another. There is too much tension.

The unwise "wise" missed or rather rejected the proper path when they made the move from attraction to promotion. Most promoters are crappy little con men. It has always been this way. In Ghandian terms they are violent in their endeavor as they go about the business of "bending people to their will". It is no different than the philosophical notions of general and particular wills where particular wills are constantly trying to manipulate and control the general will, a selfish endeavor.

100 years ago, what should have taken place would have been a more concerted effort to educate the world in the same language by sending teachers, from one culture only, to teach english or the proposed world language to every culture on earth. Then there would not be a "family" of english languages, but a solid language understandable to all without the present difficulties in understanding that we have now with these supposed "english speaking" groups. One language accepted by all would lead to peoples actually thinking in that language rather than some native tongue from which it is necessary both consciously and sub consciously to constantly translate from one language to another with residual thought processes getting in the way.

Humor is one way to gauge this. Non native english speakers do not get the jokes that come from native english speakers easily nor well. The intuitive process is destroyed between people who for various reasons cannot think in concert because of the mental barriers. Language is tied to both thought and culture. Language is supportive of culture. Change the thought, then the culture will follow to some degree.

But OH! for the globalists, this would take way too long, as in several generations, probably 3. That isn't suitable for people in a hurry. Yes, the world could naturally gravitate to a fairly common culture and goal, but not if they are beaten into it as they are now. The current venture creates a sense of enslavement among those who are suppressed into the NWO and this will always result in factions willing to take down and destroy the "masters".

Oppression breeds Rebellion. For mankind, it appears that the recurrent circle will never be escaped simply because of the vanity and selfishness of clever but unwise minds who seek to manipulate the world into their own image rather than pursuing a humanistic endeavor that is worth joining. In fact, the current plan makes the individual obsolete, in Hegelian fashion. It would be my advice that the current failed Globalism theory be destroyed in favor of a more rational and naturalized approach.

There is no such thing as "everything for the state" except in the minds of those who have lost their souls.

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
I think that terrorist is the wrong word to use, but I completely agree with what he is saying.

Kaku knows that we eventually will have to form a "one world government" in order to step out into the stars......but some people will be against it even if it is for the best of mankind.

Best for the mankind? Who are you to decide what's best for the mankind?
Do you realize how our world is run? Do you realize what will happen if we have only one world government? It will be much easier for the people from "shadow" to manipulate us, to use us, and much more. I don't want that. And I'll fight against one world government, as much as I can. If that makes me a "terrorist" I don't care, because it's a risk I'm willing to take.

One world government would be a great thing, but only if it's run by the honest and good people, not by the people who are keeping secrets from us, and who are looking only for themselves.

If you think that, we would live better if we had one world government, you are so wrong.