Do You Really Need Someone To Tell You About The Lines In The Sky?

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Afterthought

 

So what?

Anyone who has read about SRM technology knows that manmade clouds (CONtrails) are also referred to as "cirrus" clouds.

Yeah? What about it?

Here's what it's about.
Article from 2009:
www.newscientist.com...

A New Scientist special report on geoengineering earlier this year highlighted the need for such studies. Research, including some private studies, into geoengineering solutions is gathering pace and it's likely that small and eventually large-scale trials will soon be carried out.

I'd be interested to know what private companies are involved in this.

Go ahead and keep believing that nothing is going on over your head. It's all natural and nothing sinister is in the works. I'm sure your great grandchildren will be happy and healthy.
I'm sure that governments would never spray anything into the air that would be harmful to life. Right?
Private companies on the other hand.... where's the regulation?
Wait a minute. Doesn't the government regulate private companies? Isn't it a lot easier to let a private company experiment with climate engineering, then just play dumb when they're caught so it only looks as though no treaties were violated?

Originally posted by YourDreamsCanceled

Why would they put chemtrails in a movie about CARS other that to get you to think chemtrails are a normal sight in the sky?

Because it's what "THEY" do. THEY are out to get you. THEY are watching you right now.

Paranoid much?

reply to post by Afterthought


Nothing's going on over my head...

Why not?

reply to post by Afterthought


Did you even read the link in full?

Though not.

Originally posted by network dude

Originally posted by YourDreamsCanceled

Why would they put chemtrails in a movie about CARS other that to get you to think chemtrails are a normal sight in the sky?

Because it's what "THEY" do. THEY are out to get you. THEY are watching you right now.

Paranoid much?

'Paranoid much' and 'that's what they do', well if that isn't a great argument on how chemtrails don't exist, when all else fail call people names. So far you've called me a kid and paranoid but have added nothing in the way of productive information on chemtrails. I must say you intelligence is fitting for the job your doing

reply to post by ProudBird


Yes, I did read it in full.
Was there a specific line or paragraph you'd like to bring everyone's attention to or are you just flirting with me?
*blush*

reply to post by YourDreamsCanceled


Reach, much?

Why would they put chemtrails in a movie about CARS other that to get you to think chemtrails are a normal sight in the sky?

Maybe because they are contrails, not "chemtrails"?

reply to post by YourDreamsCanceled


Is it just me or have you ever seen more people trusting their government and private corporations in one forum?
It seems as though just mentioning geoengineering, climate engineering, and SRM is a light that attracts all those who believe everything's fine in the land.
How dare we question the government's actions and those involved in independent/private "research".
Grant money is granted for damn good reasons and you're a terrorist if you suggest otherwise.

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by YourDreamsCanceled

 

Reach, much?

Why would they put chemtrails in a movie about CARS other that to get you to think chemtrails are a normal sight in the sky?

Maybe because they are contrails, not "chemtrails"?

You're right.
I think it's about time someone started a thread about how contrails affect the Earth's climate.
There's certainly more than enough evidence proving that scientists are deeply concerned about this element.

Originally posted by YourDreamsCanceled

Originally posted by network dude

Originally posted by YourDreamsCanceled

Why would they put chemtrails in a movie about CARS other that to get you to think chemtrails are a normal sight in the sky?

Because it's what "THEY" do. THEY are out to get you. THEY are watching you right now.

Paranoid much?

'Paranoid much' and 'that's what they do', well if that isn't a great argument on how chemtrails don't exists, when all else fail call people names. So far you've called me a kid and paranoid but have added nothing in the way of productive information on chemtrails. I must say you intelligence is fitting for the job your doing

Here is a recap for the slow folks.
OP creates a thread stating that since his old pictures don't show contrails, that contrails/chemtrails are a new phenomenon. Then a link was given showing pictures of contrails pre 1960. Then the OP gets mad.


There is nothing wrong with being a kid. Enjoy it. It won't last forever. You can worry about how "THEY" are out to get you when you start paying your mortgage. Most if not all of what you see in the sky are just clouds. Go work in avionics for a few years and you will understand much better.

Originally posted by Afterthought

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by YourDreamsCanceled

 

Reach, much?

Why would they put chemtrails in a movie about CARS other that to get you to think chemtrails are a normal sight in the sky?

Maybe because they are contrails, not "chemtrails"?

You're right.
I think it's about time someone started a thread about how contrails affect the Earth's climate.
There's certainly more than enough evidence proving that scientists are deeply concerned about this element.

agreed.

reply to post by network dude

There is nothing wrong with being a kid.

Here's a recap:
This insult has already been thrown.

Originally posted by network dude

Here is a recap for the slow folks.

Paranoid, slow folks, and calling people kids all great points on how chemtrails don't exist, well done.

reply to post by YourDreamsCanceled


Maybe you can tell me.

Why don't I get contrails over my head?

Originally posted by network dude

There is nothing wrong with being a kid. Enjoy it. It won't last forever. You can worry about how "THEY" are out to get you when you start paying your mortgage.

They got you on the mortgage thing too, you see here in England we like to pay for things at cost and not pay interest on something you can't afford eventually pay twice the amount but I'm not here to inform you about the scam you bought into. Refinancing - a means of staying in debt. Well done again chap, you keep making me smile.

Originally posted by YourDreamsCanceled

Originally posted by network dude

There is nothing wrong with being a kid. Enjoy it. It won't last forever. You can worry about how "THEY" are out to get you when you start paying your mortgage.

They got you on the mortgage thing too, you see here in England we like to pay for things at cost and not pay interest on something you can't afford eventually pay twice the amount but I'm not here to inform you about the scam you bought into. Refinancing - a means of staying in debt. Well done again chap, you keep making me smile.

edit on 4-5-2012 by YourDreamsCanceled because: (no reason given)

Interesting.
Mortgages were 'invented' in England.

Mortgages started in “merry old England” The beginnings of a mortgage system have been found, as mentioned, as early as 1190. English common law included a law that would protect a creditor by giving him an interest in his debtor’s property. According to this law, the mortgage was a conditional sale. Although the creditor held title to the property, the debtor could, in the event the debt wasn’t paid, sell the property to recover his money. The history of the actual word “mortgage” is very interesting. In the word “mortgage”, the “mort”- is from the Latin word for death and “gage” is from the sense of that word that means a pledge to forfeit something of value if a debt is not repaid. So mortgage is literally a dead pledge. It was dead for two reasons, the property was forfeit or "dead" to the borrower if the loan wasn’t repaid, and the pledge itself was dead if the loan was repaid. The great jurist Sir Edward Coke (1552-1634) says of the word “mortgage”: It seemeth that the cause why it is called mortgage is, for that it is doubtful whether the Feoffor will pay at the day limited such summe or not, & if he doth not pay, then the Land which is put in pledge upon condition for the payment of the money, is taken from him for ever, and so dead to him vpon condition, &c. And if he doth pay the money, then the pledge is dead as to the Tenant, &c. A pretty old English way of saying the same thing, but interesting to note that the principle hasn’t changed throughout the years.

Link

Thanks so much.

reply to post by butcherguy


Just because it was invented here doesn't mean you have to be stupid and get caught up in the scam. I didn't say they didn't exist in England, most people I know are fully aware of the scam, but thanks for random facts.

Originally posted by YourDreamsCanceled
reply to post by butcherguy

 

Just because it was invented here doesn't mean you have to be stupid and get caught up in the scam.

Well you were inclined to announce how the English do things, so I just wanted to 'air things out' and let everyone know that the 'scam' was invented in England.
That way people really know how the English do things.

Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by YourDreamsCanceled

 

How interesting your buddy Uncinus fellow chemtrail debunking nazi

picasaweb.google.com...

opps, busted

I especially like the account's name. Cirrus.
Anyone who has read about SRM technology knows that manmade clouds (CONtrails) are also referred to as "cirrus" clouds.

It's "cirrus" because my full online pseudonym is "Cirrus Uncinus", my favorite type of cloud. My real name is Mick West.

The WWII photos are all real, of course. But I think a better illustration is all the photos from the 60s, 70s and 80s, some of which are found here:

contrailscience.com...
and a more active archive here:
metabunk.org...

I like this one from 1981:

reply to post by stolisGreece

Dear stolisGreece: thank you so much for your reply. I'll tell you what I tentatively think based on the information you've given i.e. when you saw the chemtrails and what was happening on the ground. I think that we, ourselves, the people, pay for this chemtrailing. I think it's a huge expense. But, like AT&T, a once gigantic telephone company, who made their billions one penny at a time, a global population taxed and spartan, by their sweat, will pay. Similar to the way Americans pay for a poison, fluoride, in our water, we will pay through higher energy prices and lower paying jobs and higher food prices and taxes on everything for the poison in our skies.

Initially, in your first post, I thought perhaps the existing PM had been given an ultimatum that he couldn't stomach.

Now, in light of your clarification, I think it really is about the money, the funding, for this project. And about public perception or lack of perception and how to bring that about. (Sorry for the ships in the night form of communication here due to time differences!) Thanks again. lxd. ~luctor et emergo~