It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Now, enough of the "Christ didn't get crowned with thorns, or scourged, or whipped or mocked and the Bible doesn't say he does either!!!" lying nonsense, PLEASE!
source
The son of Aison and Alkimede (Alcimede) and the great-grandson of Minyas.
The life of Iason was defined by two major and interconnected events: the quest for the Golden Fleece and the love of the sorceress, Medea (Medeia).
As in most heroic episodes in Greek pre-history, there is no clear beginning or starting point from which we can draw a clear cause-and-effect relationship for Iason’s glory and his, seemingly pointless, death; Iason’s father, Aison, was supposed to take the throne of Iolkos (Iolcos) after the death of his father, Kretheus (Cretheus), but he was cheated out of his inheritance by his brother-in-law, Pelias.
As a child, Iason was removed from Iolkos and put in the care of the Centaur, Kheiron (Chiron), for his protection and education; the goddess, Hera, on one of her frequent excursions into the world of mortal humans, disguised herself as an old woman and waited on the banks of the river Anauros for a kind stranger to help her cross the surging river; Iason, now a young man, assisted Hera and, by this simple demonstration of his chivalrous character, earned the eternal love and protection of the queen of the Immortals.
Originally posted by Klassified
reply to post by Iason321
Now, enough of the "Christ didn't get crowned with thorns, or scourged, or whipped or mocked and the Bible doesn't say he does either!!!" lying nonsense, PLEASE!
Now you've got me curious.
Did someone on ATS deny that the bible records these things?
Or were they denying that it happened as the bible says it did?
It is not possible to prove anything with real historic accuracy with scripture, I wish people would understand this... but to each their own I suppose.
Originally posted by Iason321
reply to post by MESSAGEFROMTHESTARS
KJV is not my only bible plus your full of it anyways,
you're links are garbage and your bible bashing is garbage,
thx
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MESSAGEFROMTHESTARS
It is not possible to prove anything with real historic accuracy with scripture, I wish people would understand this... but to each their own I suppose.
Bullcrap. There are archaeologists who go to the lands of the bible and use the text to locate things never found before. There are atheist historians who don't deny that Christ died on the cross who take the gospels as letters of historical record that they can subject to the same methods they apply to all historical texts of antiquity. They deny the supernatural aspects of the gospels, but not the historical aspects.
Originally posted by MESSAGEFROMTHESTARS
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MESSAGEFROMTHESTARS
It is not possible to prove anything with real historic accuracy with scripture, I wish people would understand this... but to each their own I suppose.
Bullcrap. There are archaeologists who go to the lands of the bible and use the text to locate things never found before. There are atheist historians who don't deny that Christ died on the cross who take the gospels as letters of historical record that they can subject to the same methods they apply to all historical texts of antiquity. They deny the supernatural aspects of the gospels, but not the historical aspects.
I suppose I mispoke, yet I did reiterate the point I was trying to make previously... and that is..
or should have been...
It is not possible to prove anything with real historic accuracy with ONLY scripture...
If you think that I am denying the accuracy as to 'Christ' dying on the cross, you are wrong in this assumption.
sorry for the confusion