It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
McMillan Group International, a company that manufactures firearms and accessories, is claiming that Bank of America asked them find another bank for “political” reasons.
The company, whose different entities have been doing business with Bank of America for more than twelve years, says it has never made a late payment, and never bounced a check.
On Thursday, the Director of Operations Kelly McMillan explained on McMillan’s Facebook page:
McMillan Fiberglass Stocks, McMillan Firearms Manufacturing and McMillan Group International have been collectively banking with Bank of America for 12 years. Today (April 19, 2012) Mr. Ray Fox, Senior Vice President, Market Manager, Business Banking, Global Commercial Banking came to my office. He scheduled the meeting as an “account analysis” meeting in order to evaluate the two lines of credit we have with them. He spent 5 minutes talking about how McMillan has changed in the last 5 years and have become more of a firearms manufacturer than a supplier of accessories.
At this point I interrupted him and asked “Can I possible save you some time so that you don’t waste your breath? What you are going to tell me is that because we are in the firearms manufacturing business you no longer what my business.”
“That is correct” he says.
I replied “That is okay, we will move our accounts as soon as possible. We can find a 2nd Amendment friendly bank that will be glad to have our business. You won’t mind if I tell the NRA, SCI and everyone one I know that BofA is not firearms industry friendly?”
“You have to do what you must” he said.
“So you are telling me this is a politically motivated decision, is that right?”
Mr Fox confirmed that it was. At which point I told him that the meeting was over and there was nothing left for him to say.
I think it is import for all Americans who believe in and support our 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms should know when a business does not support these rights. What you do with that knowledge is up to you. When I don’t agree with a business’ political position I can not in good conscience support them.
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by beezzer
Hah. They make 50 cal SASR's (Special Application Scoped Rifle) for the Canadian Military, as well as many models that are within the American MTOE as well. Not a very smart move on BoA's part.
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by beezzer
I honestly think that they are trying to make themselves appear as the "friendly neighbour.......
Originally posted by sonnny1
Great thread !
Personally,If you haven't taken your money out of BOFA,you should do so now.
I hear so many horror story's,coming out of this bank. Seriously,They should be called Bank of Anti-America.
Might just buy my next gun,or accessory,from these guys................McMillan
S&F
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by beezzer
Hah. They make 50 cal SASR's (Special Application Scoped Rifle) for the Canadian Military, as well as many models that are within the American MTOE as well. Not a very smart move on BoA's part.
In a climate of banks getting bailed out because of failing businesses, it seems rather stupid to drop a successful business.
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by beezzer
I honestly think that they are trying to make themselves appear as the "friendly neighbour," since people aren't feeling a whole lot of love for the big banks right now. Meh regardless of what they are trying to do, it was a very foolhardy decision, as McMillan Tactical is one of the most trusted military firearms manufacturers (even more-so than Barret). I am not condoning what these military weapons are used for, I am only stating where things stand.edit on 28/4/2012 by xXxinfidelxXx because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OldCorp
It is stupid, fiscally stupid. Banks are in the business of making money, so the question is: What did BoA get in return, and from whom, to drop the company's business?
Originally posted by beezzer
Truth!
Bank of American't, more like it!
Originally posted by yourmaker
thats a red flag for something going on behind the scenes, like a move to show alliegence with a specific entity.
obviously an influencing power enough to cause a bank to relinquish ties..
and if so, they might have shot themselves and everyone around them in the foot.
what is the move for? political reasons yes, to distance themselves from what?
and who benefits from the cutting of ties?
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by beezzer
Truth!
Bank of American't, more like it!
Like OldCorp said,its Financially irresponsible.....You KEEP good business partners,not let them go. Many Banks and Businesses,partner up. I am sure,some bank will step up. Last I heard,the gun business is doing extremely well in America.......edit on 28-4-2012 by sonnny1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beezzer
Exactly! Cut ties with a successful business. Lose money as part of it. This is the same bank that got (?) 45 billion last year from the government, the same government that'd like to see gun ownership gone!