It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WarJohn
Real Anarchy brings about real change.
Anarchy is a must in order to reach that great change.
Anarchy abandons the old order and over time sees to it that the old order is replaced with something new and better.
That's the purpose of anarchy. It's purpose is not to remain, but to replace something that wasn't good.
So, all in all, we need to bring anarchy in till we see the change we would like to see.
It's like keep bringing in anarchy till we get it right, I say.
Discuss!edit on 23-4-2012 by WarJohn because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ScottishBiker420
reply to post by WarJohn
Hell yes man, the only way we will get change is by violent demonstration...i am not advocating the use of violent demonstration but peaceful activism is failing,look at the media coverage the riots in london,yet OWS was relatively uncovered,some may say that is a stupid comparison but violence grabs headlines regardless of context.There needs to be something thats makes the governments fear us,rather than us fearing them and their police state.If everyone stood together it is possible!
Originally posted by artistpoet
Many people associate Anarchy with chaos.
Yet this is not what Anarchy is
Can you explain what you mean by Anarchy please
In the anarchist, Marxist and socialist sense, free association (also called free association of producers or, as Marx often called it, community of freely associated individuals) is a kind of relation between individuals where there is no state, social class or authority, in a society that has abolished the private property of means of production. Once private property is abolished, individuals are no longer deprived of access to means of production so they can freely associate themselves (without social constraint) to produce and reproduce their own conditions of existence and fulfill their needs and desires.
Originally posted by emberscott
Originally posted by artistpoet
Many people associate Anarchy with chaos.
Yet this is not what Anarchy is
Can you explain what you mean by Anarchy please
Chaos and anarchy are synonymous.
Originally posted by WarJohn
No one should be called an anarchist. They should be called a temporary anarchist.
Why?
Because anarchy is not meant to remain.
I am implying the chaos version of the versions there are.
And there are other versions that aren't chaos related.
Originally posted by artistpoet
Originally posted by emberscott
Originally posted by artistpoet
Many people associate Anarchy with chaos.
Yet this is not what Anarchy is
Can you explain what you mean by Anarchy please
Chaos and anarchy are synonymous.
In our modern times yes but todays so called Anarchism is a bastardization of it's original intent which is now lost
Originally posted by WarJohn
No one should be called an anarchist. They should be called a temporary anarchist.
Why?
Because anarchy is not meant to remain.
I am implying the chaos version of the versions there are.
And there are other versions that aren't chaos related.