It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
?
Originally posted by DaTroof
So now the CIA is trusted when it says something you folks like?
Gimme a break.
If the CIA (or anyone formerly affiliated) is touting a particular candidate, then there is a plan that utilizes him/her. Paul = safety? Pure insanity.
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
One of the many inconstancies of ATS, If I quote Michael Scheuer talking about what a ridiculous idea it is that Bin Laden was a CIA agent or debunking a 9/11 conspiracy myth everybody starts ranting about how “he would say that, cause he was in on it.”. Yet as soon as he says something you like such as “Obama=bad, Paul=good” you all lap up what he has to say and all of a sudden his political analysis is bullet proof because he is telling you what you want to hear. Its absolutely insane that this is massive inconsistency is tolerated and actively encouraged by so many on ATS.
Originally posted by randomname
.
if bill maher donated $1 million, you can imagine what wallstreets up too.
.
Originally posted by Jordan River
Ron paul is not going to win, he is done for, and if he did, he probably go senile
Originally posted by randomname
i think we'll see the best of obama in his second term. he's got nothing to lose, if he really meant he'll be a force for change.
unfortunately, people should pay attention to what he's saying. he never really specified if the change would benefit you.