posted on Sep, 27 2004 @ 09:32 AM
I agree with this article. If Howard Dean were the candidate
for the Dems, things would be different. No Kerry flip flops. No
Kerry Vietnam problems. No justified shouts of 'Kerry is a traitor'.
Issues would be discussed. It would be a very different election.
***********************************************
www.time.com...
Excerpt -
Time Magazine
October 4, 2004
By PETER BEINART
Political punditry is harder than it looks. That's what a lot of Democratic voters must be thinking right about now. Last winter Democratic-primary
voters played political consultant. They tried to step inside the minds of swing voters and figure out which Democratic presidential candidate could
beat George W. Bush. With an eye cast coldly on November, they rejected the man who had first won their hearts, Howard Dean, and flocked to the more
"electable" choice, John Kerry. Among New Hampshire voters who said beating Bush was their biggest concern, Kerry beat Dean by a whopping 52
points.
Democratic voters should stick to their day jobs. With just five weeks until Election Day, there's reason to believe they guessed wrong � that Dean
would be doing better against Bush than Kerry is. Yes, it's too late for Democrats to switch horses, but imagining how Dean might have done sheds
light on what's going on now. Here's the logic:
READ THE ARTICLE FOR THE LOGIC -
[edit on 9/27/2004 by FlyersFan]