It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The relation between the firstborn and the blessing is threefold: 1) It is found in the plain text of Scripture, 2) the words are anagrams of each other, 3) the words are integrated with the Number 2 via the value of 222, which is the Number of the Son, the Second Person of the Godhead (cf. Psalm 2). All of this reiterates the fundamental teaching of Scripture that the firstborn is to receive the blessing and also integrates with the nature of the Godhead in the Second Person, the Firstborn over all creation through whom all the the nations of the earth are blessed.
Originally posted by Awen24
...weren't you claiming to be the Antichrist last week?
2nd line
Originally posted by NewerBeing
Life was found on Mars
Originally posted by Daemonicon
How would your biblical numbers address the following?
Denisova hominin
H. antecessor
H. cepranensis
H. erectus
H. ergaster
H. floresiensis
H. gautengensis
H. georgicus
H. habilis
H. heidelbergensis
H. neanderthalensis
H. rhodesiensis
H. rudolfensis
H. sapiens idaltu
H. sapiens sapiens (modern humans)
Those are all intermediates in the path of evolution for humans. How is the list above ignorance?
Edit to add:
Please, if you will, address how if you plot the DNA resemblances in a hierarchical pattern, it all falls nicely into a family tree. The Evolutionary tree of life.edit on 19-4-2012 by Daemonicon because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 1beerplease
reply to post by EnochWasRight
interesting. i am not into the bible so i cannot comment too much. but i no about numbers and such. i do believe there is more to the bible than what is said. it is a very intricate. confusing and different. i believe it is spoken all metaphorically, and without the correct knowledge (besides every bible being undoubtedly heavily edited) and interpreter our understanding will be wrong or close, maybe some of both.
you stated. quote from OP: In the Beginning (Time), God created the heavens (Space) and the earth (Matter). Let there be light (Energy).
my view- matter is light/energy.... let there be "light" could mean consciousness, be awake, alive,
*god* is merely a construct invented by the human mind to understand the universe for people who have had there imaginations and free will stripped from them.... oh and the lazy people too. hehe
Originally posted by Daemonicon
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Unfortunately, I do not have the time to watch this lecture now, but I will bookmark for future viewing.
I don't see how any of your reply addresses or refutes evolution. If mankind was created in God's image, and I would have to assume that these would be modern homo sapiens, it would negate the fact that we have evolved from earlier apes to simpler human to modern human. An admission of this kind would fly directly in the face of the overwhelming evidence.
Unless, of course, the bible is stating that Adam and Eve were earlier forms of 'man' and have since evolved into what we are now. Most depictions and stories I hear of Adam and Eve portray them as modern homo sapiens.
Perhaps I have missed your point, but I think my point was also missed.
Originally posted by Iason321
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Check out the post's ive made on this forum regarding theistic evolution and how to correctly interpret Genesis,
I think you'll be amazed, and now you can stop battling mainstream science and stop arguing that earth is not 4.54 billion years old and the universe is however old they say it is.....
Now you can go right along with them, AND Darwinian evolution, AND still hold the Bible is 100% true and Gods word!
God works in mysterious (and delightful) ways!
The Truth shall set you free!
Originally posted by iterationzero
reply to post by EnochWasRight
As I indicated in the last thread you posted this tripe in, 111 isn't hydrogen -- hydrogen, in its most abundant state, which is all you seem to care about based on your treatment of carbon earlier, has no neutrons. Its number would be 110.
L2Science.
Originally posted by Barcs
What does ANY of that have to do with evolution? You are doing the same nonsense as the last thread. You put evolution in the title only to mislead. What you have is numerical theory that has absolutely nothing to do with evolution. Stop with the deception already.
Evolution is a result and not a cause. To take away consciousness as preexisting matter, we blaspheme the Holy Spirit. Spirit is consciousness. The indeterminate wave of probability is collapsed by making a choice of positive and negative. Free will is collapsing wave function. The Wave is the second in the trinity. Son is Word. Word is information. Apart from information, no wave collapse can take place and entropy in information takes over, degrading the information over time. These two theories deny evolution as a cause and reduce it to a result. On this foundation, all of science lacks the proper implication from the data it observes because it leaves out information as evident in the origin of the cosmos.
If anyone needs a quote to disprove evolution as a cause, the paragraph above says it all.