It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by timidgal
reply to post by Tachalka
Again, my genuine thanks for the comments. It's nice to know others find this inconceivable.
Originally posted by Domo1
I was severely disabled for most of 2010 and earned absolutely no income. I collected approximately $35,000 through an employer-sponsored private disability plan, which was considered taxable income
Do you owe $35k or is the $35k taxable? I'm going to assume you mean the $35k was taxable, because if you owed that much for one year of income tax you are doing pretty well. I would consult a CPA, and not one that works for H&R Block.
Originally posted by SavedOne
Originally posted by timidgal
I collected approximately $35,000 through an employer-sponsored private disability plan, which was considered taxable income
Originally posted by timidgalA person who worked hard, earned a decent income and paid more than her fair share of taxes for more than 20 years, all the while never turning down a chance to help other people in need, finds herself in a situation where she owes Uncle Sam $36,000 because she was too sick to work
We can all agree that we're overtaxed, but I think in this case you've made a rather large mistake because it's literally impossible for you to owe 36,000.00 in taxes on a 35,000.00 declared income. The absolute worst case scenario is if you're single, that would place you in the 15% tax bracket which works out to 5250 in taxes. But it's likely that you won't owe anything close to that after your medical write-offs are incorporated. Don't try to figure this out yourself, go to a tax consultant. People make these sorts of mistakes all the time because they think their taxes are "easy" and they can do it themselves. There are no such things as "easy" tax returns, they don't exist.
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by timidgal
I don't know if anyone brought this yet or if it even applies to you ( I hope so)...
Disability income taxable?
Originally posted by timidgal
This is one of many perfect examples about what is wrong with the US tax system and how our social and fiscal systems do absolutely nothing to take care of those who support it.
I was severely disabled for most of 2010 and earned absolutely no income. I collected approximately $35,000 through an employer-sponsored private disability plan, which was considered taxable income because my employer, for whom I worked my a** off for many years, was too cheap to give their employees the opportunity to pay the relatively small group disability premiums themselves with post-tax dollars (they had the choice to either give their employees the tax break or pay the small premiums themselves, thereby taking a corporate tax deduction and making any employee disability benefits taxable to the sick employee). Since I had two kids in college, I had no choice but to take an early distribution on my 401(k) in order to pay two college tuitions for kids who will probably graduate to find no jobs available. The tuition is not something I am complaining about because I would do anything to give my kids the slimmest chance of success in the future, but the overall theme is just disgusting.
A person who worked hard, earned a decent income and paid more than her fair share of taxes for more than 20 years, all the while never turning down a chance to help other people in need, finds herself in a situation where she owes Uncle Sam $36,000 because she was too sick to work (and believe me, almost half of that disability money went toward paying COBRA insurance premiums and the remaining money went toward uncovered medical expenses) and had no choice but to take money from her retirement savings to pay her kids' tuition so they wouldn't be kicked out of school.
Don't get me wrong - I know there are plenty of people who, in my situation, wouldn't have had disability benefits or retirement savings to fall back on, but that is neither here nor there. I worked hard and paid dearly for those benefits (which in this case is an oxymoron). Had I not worked so hard all those years, the system would have had no choice but to take care of me through public entitlements and the such. My tax dollars went towards supporting many folks in that position when they couldn't help themselves - and I was more than happy to participate in a system that supposedly helped take care of their own - but how is it fair that the same is not extended to me in my time of need? With the inequities of the 1% and a system that is plainly not equitable "to all" in times of need, is it any wonder that we've seen a continuous deterioration of those folks formerly known as the middle class, the true backbone of our society?
Originally posted by pacifier2012
So you're saying you never bought enough disability insurance to cover this event?
and now it's someone elses fault?edit on 18-4-2012 by pacifier2012 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by timidgal
Originally posted by pacifier2012
So you're saying you never bought enough disability insurance to cover this event?
and now it's someone elses fault?edit on 18-4-2012 by pacifier2012 because: (no reason given)
It was not a private policy so I had no choice on the level of benefits and you're missing the point. This is not about the amount of benefits I received or whether I think they were enough but how if you're disabled, it doesn't seem fair that I should be taxed when I've paid taxes for 20+ years to help others who were not as fortunate as me (and we're talking in the hundreds of thousands of dollars over 20+ plus years.
Could I have found a way to play the system and receive certain entitlements? Probably yes but I never would have taken the money from people less fortunate than myself. All I'm saying is that when the time came that I needed help, there was none and that's not right.
Originally posted by timidgal
Originally posted by pacifier2012
So you're saying you never bought enough disability insurance to cover this event?
and now it's someone elses fault?edit on 18-4-2012 by pacifier2012 because: (no reason given)
It was not a private policy so I had no choice on the level of benefits and you're missing the point. This is not about the amount of benefits I received or whether I think they were enough but how if you're disabled, it doesn't seem fair that I should be taxed when I've paid taxes for 20+ years to help others who were not as fortunate as me (and we're talking in the hundreds of thousands of dollars over 20+ plus years.
Could I have found a way to play the system and receive certain entitlements? Probably yes but I never would have taken the money from people less fortunate than myself. All I'm saying is that when the time came that I needed help, there was none and that's not right.
So how much did you take from your 401k? Since you posted that you spent the whole $35,000 in disability on deductible medical expenses that would mean $35,000/ .075 = over $400,000. So obviously you did not spend it all on the expenses you cite. If you seriously want help you need to come clean. Regardless if you spent the disability on medical, that income alone should have resulted in taxable income of about $15,000 after the standard deduction and 3 personal exemptions. Tax on $15,000 is $1646 for a head of household.
Not sure where you live, buy let's say that state and local taxes are 10% or $3600. Even if for some reason you can't claim the exmption for the early withdrawal. That means another $3600 in IRS penalties. Leaves $28,800 in Federal Tax at a minimum. Under current tax rates this means you withdrew at least $135,000 from the 401k. Pretty expensive college isn't it?
Something tellls me you yanked your entire 401K when you became disabled. a big mistake. if you would have staggered it over a few years things would have worked out better.
Originally posted by timidgal
reply to post by Furbs
I would agree on the distribution although I feel that the hardship provisions should be revised. I knew about the penalty and the fact that I had no other resources from which to draw upon is unfortunate but you have to pay the price; however, I don't see how one could reason that a disability benefit qualifies as a capital gain.