It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by Stormdancer777
More paranoid delusions.
Originally posted by bknapple32
You do realize this was a hoax thread right???
Originally posted by Jameela
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by timetothink
Your proof?
James Buchanan and Chester Alan Arthur
You also ignore the fact that Obama lost his dual citizenship in 1983....
James Buchanan’s father came to America in the early 1780′s, becoming a ‘citizen of the United States at the Adoption of the Constitution’. James was born in the United States in 1791.
And Chester Allan Arthur had to hide his birthright, which has been proven (simply google it) in order to obtain presidency.
and I have acknowledged that Obama was 22 when he lost his dual citizenship, but natural born has to be at birth... hence the born part!
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
None of Obama's on line birth certificates are admissible in a court of law, or can be used by either side to prove or disprove his citizenship,
www.americanthinker.com...
Of course, the same question has dogged Barack Obama since before the 2008 election and continues to this day. While Obama claims to have been born in Hawaii, the birth document he released with great fanfare at the White House in April 2011 has been determined by multiple document experts as well as a six-month law enforcement investigation almost certainly to be a forgery.
Yet even if Obama could document a Hawaii birth, he still arguably would not qualify as a “natural born citizen” of the United States since he was not born of two U.S. citizen parents, Obama’s father having been a Kenyan national.
Compounding all the controversy over presidential eligibility is the fact that the Constitution does not define “natural born citizen,” requiring legal and historical research to determine precisely what the Founders meant.
Attorney Herb Titus, who has taught constitutional law for nearly 30 years and was the founding dean of the College of Law and Government at Regent University in Virginia Beach, Va., says the “natural born” language was used because the Founding Fathers wanted a leader without divided loyalties.
the trip by Lugar and Obama to Russia in 2005 was designed to promote the scandal-ridden “Cooperative Threat Reduction Program” (CTR), also known as the Nunn-Lugar program for its original Senate sponsors. Lugar and Obama co-sponsored a follow-up program.
And those schemes have included the betrayal both of the United States and her allies.
In 2009 Obama scrapped the long awaited missile defense system for Poland and the Czech Republic because Russia objected.
He has refused to keep secret the technical data on the U.S Standard Missile-3,as called for in the 2012 defense authorization bill.
Obama will not pledge to keep American missile technology from China,North Korea and Iran,as it would “…interfere with [his] constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs…”
Obama will provide Russia information on every Trident missile supplied to Great Britain as part of an arms control deal signed with Russian President Medvedev.
Leaked cables show that the US will now provide Russia with ALL serial numbers of Trident missiles transferred to Britain.
Obama proposes the United States CUT its nuclear arsenal by 80%,yet demands no reciprocity on the part of Russia or any of America’s enemies.
Joe Miller,2010 US Senate candidate from Alaska,reports that,under the guise of drawing a boundary,7 Alaska-area islands and oil rich sea beds containing perhaps billions of barrels were given to Russia in an unannounced,secret deal by Obama’s State Department.
Originally posted by bknapple32
Originally posted by sting130u
reply to post by Human_Alien
I find it funny how many of us are sitting on our thumbs wondering what we should do. Um, hello, there are millions of us. Maybe even hundreds of millions. I am still wondering why we have NOT walked to the White House, walked inside, and served him with his eviction notice (pink slip). No use impeaching him, he's not even president.
And stop calling him president as well, clearly he is not OUR (the people) president. Right now the President is us, the People.
Evict him and deport him, for treason he should be jailed. Evict him from the property for being an illegal imposter.
Or are we going to sit on our thumbs some more. Here's a story for you:
While waiting to pay for gas at a local store, customers observed a mother was stumbling into her vehicle. When she finally got in, she turned on the windshield wipers, instead of the car. She fidgeted around, and still was not going anywhere. She tried to wipers some more. That was not going to get her home.
Customers started talking, about how drunk this woman was (or maybe something medically wrong, it was day time). Someone mentioned a kid being in the car, and at least 14 customers and three employees saw the child. No one knows what to do. Clearly this child was in danger if he left with this woman....
One person, angry that hes sitting in the very back of the line, wondering whats taking so damn long, and running late for work, spoke up. He yelled over the whole crowd as eyes glared into him. He asked a simple question.
"How many of you all are going to feel bad tomorrow when you read in the paper that a mother killed her child in our town after leaving this store."
"What should we do? We can't stop her", Some chimed.
"Call the cops, and block her in and go ask her if she is ok, make conversation."
Cell phones came out, and a lady went out there to ask her if she was ok.
I could not believe how late I was to work over this.... Oh and that no one spoke up for the kid....
Time for sleep....
You do realize this thread is a proven hoax right???
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
GOP 'superstar' for VP faces eligibility questions
www.wnd.com...
Originally posted by sting130u
The thread might be, but the president is also a hoax.
And before you call me a birther, you do realize that makes you sound like those old time people who would call anyone a witch that disagreed with them or had other beliefs.
The evidence is all right there, the fact that there is controversy over this issue still to this day four years later it should be obvious that something isn't right.
Jay, who later became president of the Continental Congress and the first Supreme Court chief justice, wrote: “Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”
The definition of natural-born citizen approved by the first U.S. Congress can be seen in the Naturalization Act of 1790, which regarded it as a child born of two American parents. The law, specifying that a natural-born citizen need not be born on U.S. soil, stated: “The children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.”
It's still not the same though because....at least Rubios father is an American...we don't know what or maybe even who Obama's father is.
Originally posted by AuranVector
And it also amazes me that people forget the whole "Barry Soetoro" thing in Indonesia.
Obama lost his US citizenship at that point -- he became an Indonesian national.
both the 1940 Nationality Act and the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, which amended the 1940 Act, expressly provided that Obama could not lose his US citizenship by virtue of his mother's actions so long as he returned to the US and established residency before he was 23/25.
The point is: Obama has a murky past.
Originally posted by timetothink
The Naturalization Act of 1790 did indeed define the term Natural Born, the president must be from parents who were US Citizens and NO Supreme court ruling has ever changed the definition....