It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So, the resurrection has been proven to be true?
Originally posted by manna2
It fails and all you have to do to disprove Christianity is disprove the resurrection.
You nor anyone else in 2000 years has been able to do that.
You see, He lives.
He conquered death.
He is alive and the first born of the resurrection.
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by apushforenlightment
Cool translation. However, how many people see it as thus? How many people truly practice it as thus? I just spoke to a Christian who said, "God will take care of it all. Don't worry."
My worry is this: maybe we'll destroy the earth before God decides to step in. What if we're all an experiment and he intends to let us blow up the planet, and then he'll start over again, using different parameters?
What if we're all an experiment and he intends to let us blow up the planet, and then he'll start over again, using different parameters?
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by apushforenlightment
Cool translation. However, how many people see it as thus? How many people truly practice it as thus? I just spoke to a Christian who said, "God will take care of it all. Don't worry."
My worry is this: maybe we'll destroy the earth before God decides to step in. What if we're all an experiment and he intends to let us blow up the planet, and then he'll start over again, using different parameters?
Originally posted by manna2
reply to post by Starchild23
ok, I will help you understand your fatal flaw that will never allow you closure on this.
You have pre-suppositions you refuse to address that force you to draw faulty conclusions using faulty logic.
I will do my best to keep it simple.
The law and prophecies precede both moses and Christ.
All cultures were taught and knew the law explaining cross-over in cultures as was prophecy concerning the annointed one.
It is said that the Mazzaroth is the first recorded prophecy for man, before wriring existed.
It is believed that Adam, Seth and Enoch devised Mazzaroth, of course inspired from Yah and what was taught to Adam after His fall.
It told of Yah's love for man and His plan for redemption through a God/man to come.
It's what the wise men from Persia understood as they read the stars and then set out on journy to see Him at the time of Messiah's birth.
All cultures knew of it.
It is why Nimrod claimed these prophecies of himself as he attempted to elevate himself to that of worship.
One of the first archetypes for a false messiah, or anti-christ.
There have been many in past and present that have sought this worship for themselves.
Now this is where you seem to hold dear to your pre-suppositions.
You want to believe the story begins in the center of the book, and not the beginning.
So you only seem to try and prove messiah or discount Him claiming He is a copy of the false messiah's before Him, which all pointed to prophecy as their evidence for their claim.
Yashayah is the fulfillment of all these prophecies where all the posers attempted to claim.
You are trying to prove the validity of a real 100 dollar bill by claiming the counterfeit bills came before as proof of it being fake because it was printed at a later date than what is on the counterfeit.
You seem to stop your search in the past at Nimrod and neglect the earlier prophecies that date back to Mazzaroth.
And no, it's not astrology.
Astrology is from the mystery schools that attempted to skew the truth for their own purpose to elevate their own god.
Start with Mazzaroth for the earliest claims.
It is why Nimrods bones were broken, to prove he was a poser for all to see.
Start at the beginning of the book to understand the ending instead of the dramatic middle where it looks muddled and obscure.
I am telling you the zeitgeist really messed up people from understanding this as it taught everyone how to start in the middle of the drama for proof of later posers as to misidentify the real story in play.
Originally posted by manna2
reply to post by autowrench
This statement of yours tells the whole story.
We do not worship a dead man.
You know this yourself to be true.
In fact I say this.
Without the resurrection christianity simply does not exist.
It fails and all you have to do to disprove Christianity is disprove the resurrection.
You nor anyone else in 2000 years has been able to do that.
You see, He lives.
He conquered death.
He is alive and the first born of the resurrection.
He isthe great I AM.
He is Yashayah, the I AM Salvation.
I have to address nothing more to discredit you as a charleton than state this fact. You know we do not worship a dead man. You may imply it for your own "blind faith" but not mine or others.
No Christian AT ALL places their faith in a dead man.
You simply lie to make your own point.
Well, the bible says he was put in a tomb after he was crucified. According to the bible, his own disciples believed it was over also.
Originally posted by autowrench
OK, if Jesus lives and walks, what in hell does he need a bone box for then? Besides, the letter "J" did not exist until 500 years ago, and there are not one Vowel in the entire Hebrew language. Of course, if you can prove his existence, post his mailing address, as you seem to know where he lives at, and perhaps take a few photos of him? Then perhaps we will believe you. Until then, he is dead, dead, dead. As a doornail. No amount of wishing will make him alive, either.
Are you saying that the prophecies in the bible prove it? If so, do the prophecies in ancient Greek writings prove them to be true? Oh, and I am listening. Did the holy spirit tell you I wasn't?
Originally posted by manna2
"But know this first of all: in prophecy of scripture it is not a matter of one's own interpretation, for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but by men, moved by the Holy Spirit, spoke from God"
You start with humility and a meekness allowing Him to lead you.
His word is alive and the Holy Spirit confirms truth as truth.
We are all to find this experientally, using His Word as the foundation.
See it like this.
The Bible is the lesson manual, the Holy Spirit is the teacher.
It's a supernatural work that requires your own due diligence. If you go into it to disprove it, you will find what you want.
If you seek in it truth about Him, you are sure to find it with the help of the Holy Spirit.It can be done without scripture but not intended for us that way since there is a clear reason we have been given the blessing of a critical thinking mind.
Or we can watch the ten commandments on t.v. to reinforce what we feel we allready believed and then switch the channel for a few 90 second soundbites to tickle our ears.(sarcasm)
I KNOW this isn't the type of answer you want from me.
so what?
Your not listening anyway.
Originally posted by reficul
finally! some one gets it!!!
christianity is a false religion made up by romans and jewish kiss asses to control the masses.
i do believe jesus was real and his teaching was pure. the gnostics and the cathers and the templars knew the truth. thats why they were killed. look into mithras, he shares many similar traites as jesus. he was a roman god.
thanx for the post,simple but effective!
get ready for the christians.............. they're coming!
Originally posted by Lionhearte
Originally posted by reficul
finally! some one gets it!!!
christianity is a false religion made up by romans and jewish kiss asses to control the masses.
i do believe jesus was real and his teaching was pure. the gnostics and the cathers and the templars knew the truth. thats why they were killed. look into mithras, he shares many similar traites as jesus. he was a roman god.
thanx for the post,simple but effective!
get ready for the christians.............. they're coming!
LOL. Are you serious? You can't be.
Do you know ANYTHING about the Jewish and Roman authorities?
Wait, I don't even need to ask, because your statement proves you don't.
Look up a little historical evidence about how oppressive they were, and how physically IMPOSSIBLE it would have been for Christianity to have just sprung up out of nowhere; the only way it could have is if the accounts were true. Meaning Jesus was real. And was the Son of God.
Mithras is a false god created based off the accounts of the prophecies of the coming of Jesus. Remember, Jesus was prophesied since the very beginning, even through his genealogy.
Originally posted by swan001
reply to post by whyamIhere
I may sound stupid, here, but...
What's an OP?
So when you read that 1 day is like 1000 years to god, you think it is literal? You DON'T think the author was merely using that as an example that his god is timeless, and time means nothing to him? Couldn't the author have said, "One second is like 1000 days to god," and meant the same exact thing?
Originally posted by ntzeret
.. a day to God is like 1000 years.. well 2000 years from the incident at the well would be around the year 2027.. IMHO i think that is when he will return. and incidently that years is a jubilee year....
You mean to tell me that god created angels with reproductive organs? If so, can they mate with each other and produce offspring? If not, why did god create them with reproductive organs? And a better question is, why is their dna compatible with our dna so that an offspring can be born?
Originally posted by manna2
Amen and Amen!
I will add that Lucifer was most likely Cain's twin sister, offspring of Samael or satan.
But your post is spot on!